Abstract
Frequently environmental pollution results from different hazardous substances released in the environment, meaning that contaminated sites may have many different chemical sources and transport pathways. Problems concerning environmental pollution affect mainly physical, chemical and biological properties of air, water and soil. The relationships between the sources, exposure and effects of contaminants to human and ecological receptors are complex and many times are specific to a particular site, to certain environmental conditions and to a particular receptor. Often the methodology for exposure and risk assessment to environmental pollution is translated into sets of assessment questions. These questions are used to meet the needs of assessment, particular important in focusing the assessment during the problem formulation. Risk assessments vary widely in scope and application. Some look at single risks in a range of exposure scenarios, others are site-specific and look at the range of risks posed by a facility. In general, risk assessments are carried out to examine the effects of an agent on humans (Health Risk Assessment) and ecosystems (Ecological Risk Assessment). Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) is the examination of risks resulting from technology that threaten ecosystems, animals and people. It includes human health risk assessments, ecological risk assessments and specific industrial applications of risk assessment that analyze identified end-points in people, biota or ecosystems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ATSDR. (2008), Public Health Assessment, Monticello Mill Tailings (DOE) and Monticello Radioactively Contaminated Properties (aka Monticello Vicinity Properties). Online: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/PHA/monticel/mon_p2b.html.
Bettencourt A.O., Teixeira M.M., Elias M.D., Madruga M.J. (1990), Environmental monitoring in uranium areas. In: Environmental Behaviour of Radium, Vol. 2. Technical Reports Series N.° 310, pp. 281–294, IAEA, Vienna.
Calewaert J.B. (2006), Environmental Risk Assessment for Pollution of Marine Activities. Adapted from Le Roy D., Volckaert A., Vermoote S., Wachter B., Maes F., Coene J. and Calewaert J.B., Risk Analysis of Marine Activities in the Belgian Part of the North Sea (RAMA). Research in the framework of the BELSPO Global Change, Ecosystems and Biodiversity, SPSDII, 107 pp. Online: http://www.encora.eu/coastalwiki/Main_Page.
Dinis M.L. and FiÚza A. (2005), Simulation of liberation and transport of radium from uranium tailings, in: Uranium in the Environment – Mining Impact and Consequences, pp. 609–618. Broder J. Merkel; Andrea Hasche-Berger (Eds), 897 pp., Proceedings of the Congress: Uranium Mining and Hydrogeology IV, Freiberg, Germany, 11–16 September 2005, Springer publishers-ISBN 10 3-540-28363-3; ISBN 13 978-3-540-28368-8.
Dinis M.L. and Fiúza A. (2006), Modeling the transport and fate of pollutants in the environment: soil, water and air, in Chemicals as an Intentional and Accidental Global Environmental Threats, pp. 469–476. Simeonov, Lubomir and Chirila, Elisabeta (Eds), Springer, XX, 514 pp., ISBN-10: 1-4020-5096-8; ISBN-13: 978-1-4020-5096-1.
Dinis M.L. and FiÚza A. (2007), Exposure assessment to radionuclides transfer in food chain, in: Multiple Stressors: A Challenge for the Future, pp. 309–323. Series: NATO Science for Peace and Security, Environmental Security. Mothersill, Carmel; Mosse, Irma; Seymour, Colin (Eds), Springer, 375 pp., ISBN: 978-1-4020-6334-3.
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1995), Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST), Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Radionuclide Carcinogenicity Slope Factors: HEAST. Online: http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/heast/.
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1997), Exposure Factors Handbook, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/P-95/002. Online: http://www.epa.gov/ncea/pdfs/efh/.
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1998), Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities. Office of Solid Waste, EPA530-D-98-001A. Online: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/combust/risk.htm.
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1999), Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides, Federal Guidance Report No. 13, EPA 402-R-99-001, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air. Online: http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/federal/ 402-r-99-001.pdf.
EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2007), Framework for Metals Risk Assessment, EPA 1205/R-07/001. Office of Science Advisor, Risk Assessment Forum. Online: http://www.epa.gov/osa/metalsframework/.
EXMIN. (2003), Estudo Director de Áreas de Minérios Radioactivos – 2.a fase. Companhia de Indústria e Serviços Mineirose Ambientais, SA.
Fairman R., Mead C.D., Williams W.P. (1998), Environmental Risk Assessment – Approaches, Experiences and Information Sources. Published by European Environment Agency – EEA. Online: http://reports.eea.europa.eu/GH-07-97-595-EN-C2/en/riskindex.html.
Falcão J.M., Carvalho F.P., Leite M.R.M, Alarcão M., Cordeiro E., Ribeiro J. (2005), MinUrar, Minas de Urânio e seus Resíduos: Efeitos na Saúde da População, Relatório científico I, Publ. INSA, INETI, ITN.
IRIS. (2008), Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/ index.cfm.
Khan A.J. (2000), A study of indoor radon levels in Indian dwellings, influencing factors and lung cancer risks. Radiation Measurements 32(2000) 87–92.
Nero J.M.G., Dias J.M.M., Pereira A.J.S.C., Neves L.J.P.F., Torrinha J. (2005), Environmental Evaluation and Remediation Methodologies of Radioactive Abandoned Mines in Portugal. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Environmental Contamination from Uranium Production Facilities and their Remediation, Lisbon, IAEA, pp. 145–158.
Pereira A.J.S.C., Neves L.J.P.F., Dias J.M.M, Campos A.B.A., Barbosa S.V.T. (2004), Evaluation of the Radiological Hazards from Uranium Mining and Milling Wastes (Urgeiriça – Central Portugal), XI International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association.
Rood A.S. (2003), Risk Analysis, Communication, Evaluation, and Reduction at LANL, Contemporary Risk Assessment Methodology, 9-RACER LANL-2003-DRAFT.
Wilcox R.L.T., Burrows M.C.D.R., Ghosh S., Ayyub B.M. (2000), Risk-Based Technology for the Safety Assessment of Marine Compressed Natural Gas Fuel Systems. International Cooperation on Marine Engineering Systems/The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. Paper presented at the 8th ICMES/SNAME, New York Metropolitan Section Symposium in New York, May 22–23, 2000.
WISE, World Information Service on Energy. (2004), Uranium Radiation Properties. Online: http://www.wise-uranium.org/ruxfr.html.
Yu C., Zielen A.J., Cheng J.-J., LePoire D.J., Gnanapragasam E., Kamboj S., Arnis J., Wallo III A., Williams W.A., Peterson H. (2001), User's manual for RESRAD, version 6, ANL/EAD-4. Environmental Assessment Division, Argonne National Laboratory, IL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dinis, M.D.L., Fiúza, A. (2009). Methodology for Exposure and Risk Assessment in Complex Environmental Pollution Situations. In: Simeonov, L.I., Hassanien, M.A. (eds) Exposure and Risk Assessment of Chemical Pollution — Contemporary Methodology. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2335-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2335-3_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2334-6
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2335-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)