Skip to main content

The Course Experience Questionnaire, Graduate Destination Survey, and Learning and Teaching Performance Fund in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Policy for Academic Quality

Part of the book series: Higher Education Dynamics ((HEDY,volume 30))

Abstract

The Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) and Graduate Destinations Survey (GDS) are instruments jointly administered as part of an annual national population survey of the graduates of all Australian universities. The survey instruments are designed to measure and quantify some of the important outcomes of Australian higher education, such as graduate satisfaction with courses, employment rates and commencing salaries. The data are analysed by an independent agency and reported by institution and by field of study. The survey's findings, in particular the comparative potential across institutions, are of interest to government policy-makers, institutional management and prospective students and are used for, among other things, quality assurance, information for prospective students and, most recently, performance-based incentive funding. During 2005, data from the CEQ and GDS were used for the first time as performance indicators for a strategic national Learning and Teaching Performance Fund (LTPF) administered by the federal Department of Education, Science and Training. This paper examines the background to the implementation of the CEQ and GDS, the goals, the uses for the data, including the LTPF and some of the criticism of this development, and the apparent influence on policy and practice within a higher education system that has developed a stronger market orientation and increasingly sought quantitative performance indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Australian government department concerned with higher education publishes these statistics annually. An archive of reports, commencing 1992, is available at http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/highered/statistics/characteristics/contents.htm/

    contents.htm while more recent reports (from 2001) are available at http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/statistics/publications_higher_education_statistics_collections.htm. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  2. 2.

    In 2005 there were 43 participating higher education institutions, including several private providers such as Bond University.

  3. 3.

    Based on DEST statistics for 2004.

  4. 4.

    Six criteria were specified, including ‘Evidence that the statistical year was atypical’, and ‘Evidence that a high result against one indicator directly contributed to a lower result against another indicator’ (DEST 2005).

References

  • Access Economics Pty Ltd. (2005). Review of higher education outcome performance indicators. Report prepared for DEST. June 2005. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/profiles/review_highered_outcome_perf_indicators.htm. Acccessed 15 January 2009.

  • Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). (nd). Graduate skills assessment – GSA. http://www.acer.edu.au/gsa-uni/. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Australian Research Council (ARC) (2008). ERA indicator principles. Canberra: ARC. http://www.arc. gov.au/pdf/ERA_Indicator_Principles.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2009.

  • Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee (AVCC) (2004). Assessing learning and teaching: The AVCC proposal for the learning and teaching performance fund. AVCC. August 2004. http://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/documents/publications/policy/statements/AVCC-response_ALTPF.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee and Graduate Careers Council of Australia (AVCC-GCCA). (2001). Code of Practice for the public disclosure of data from the Graduate Careers Council of Australia’s Graduate Destination Survey, Course Experience Questionnaire and Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire. January 2001. Canberra. http://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/documents/policies_programs/graduates/2003/COP_2001.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee and Graduate Careers Council of Australia (AVCC-GCCA). (2005). Standard recommended methodology for the Graduate Destination Survey, Course Experience Questionnaire and Postgraduate Research Experience Questionnaire. May 2005. http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/content/download/2611/10493/file/ Std_ Recommended_Methodology_May_2005.doc. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.deewr.gov.au/he_review_finalreport. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M., Kogan, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement (3rd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuenin, S. (1988). Performance indicators in higher education: A study of their development and use in 15 OECD countries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (nd). Student outcome indicators for the Learning and Teaching Performance Fund. Technical Note No. 2. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/policy_issues_reviews/key_issues/assuring_; quality _in_higher_education/technical_note_2.htm. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2000). Characteristics and performance indicators of Australian Higher Education Institutions, 2000. Occasional Paper Series. December 2001. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/ statistics/publications_higher_education_statistics_collections.htm#studpubs. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2002). Higher education at the crossroads: An overview paper. DEST. April 2002. http://www.backingaustraliasfuture.gov.au/ publications/crossroads/default.htm. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (nd). Our universities: Backing Australia’s future. http://www.backingaustraliasfuture.gov.au/Default.htm. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2004). Learning and Teaching Performance Fund: Issues paper. April 2004. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/policy_issues_reviews/key_issues/learning_teaching/ltpf/data_and_ref_links.htm. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST) (2005). Learning and Teaching Performance Fund 2006: Administrative information for providers. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/policy_issues_reviews/key_issues/learning_teaching/ltpf/2006ltpf.htm. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA) (1998). The characteristics and performance indicators of Australian institutions. Occasional Paper Series 98-A. December 1998. Canberra: Higher Education Division, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers (nd). GradStats & GradFiles. http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/content/view/full/24. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Griffin, P., Coates, H., McInnis, C., James, R. (2003). The development of an extended course experience questionnaire. Quality in Higher Education, 9(3), 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, R., Baldwin, G., McInnis. C. (1999). Which university? The factors influencing the choices of prospective undergraduates. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R. (2000). Quality assurance and the growing puzzle of managing organisational knowledge in universities. Higher Education Management, 12(3), 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke, R. (1991). Performance indicators in higher education. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C., Griffin, P., James, R., Coates, H. (2001). Development of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (nd). OECD feasibility study for the International Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO). http://www.oecd.org/edu/ahelo. Accessed 15 January 2009.

  • Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., Lizzio, A., Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, KL., James, R. (2010). The Course Experience Questionnaire, Graduate Destination Survey, and Learning and Teaching Performance Fund in Australia. In: Dill, D., Beerkens, M. (eds) Public Policy for Academic Quality. Higher Education Dynamics, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3754-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics