Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Science Teachers’ Knowledge About Learning and Teaching Models and Modeling in Public Understanding of Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Models and Modeling

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 6))

Abstract

Models play a central role in science education. Traditionally, the focus is on the content of the models being taught and learned, and little explicit attention is devoted to the nature and characteristics of scientific models. The introduction of public understanding of science in the Dutch education system aimed a shift from the transmission of existing knowledge to the understanding of the development and the role of models in science. In this study, we explored the developing knowledge about learning and teaching models and modeling of nine science teachers in the first year of teaching this syllabus. In addition, we examined their developing pedagogical content knowledge of a specific topic in the syllabus, namely, Models of the Solar System and the Universe. For this purpose, we applied the rep grid method and a semi-structured interview, in three subsequent years. In contrast to previous research on science teachers’ knowledge about the use of models and modeling in learning science, it was found that modeling as a learning activity for students and activities with regard to reflection on the nature of models were not unusual in the teaching practice of the participants in our study. The development of the teachers’ knowledge, over the years, can be characterized by either an expansion or an endorsement of initial ideas and perceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abd-El Khalik, F., & Boujade, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezzi, A. (1996). Use of repertory grids in facilitating knowledge construction and reconstruction in geology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 179–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Calderhead, & P. Gates (Eds.). (1993). Conceptualising reflection on teacher development. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clermont, C. P., Borko, H., & Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Comparative study of the pedagogical content knowledge of experienced and novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporaal, A. H. (1991). Repertory grid research into cognitions of prospective primary school teachers. Teacher and Teacher Education, 7, 315–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2002). Engaging prospective science teachers in building, testing, and teaching about models. Paper presented at the Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A., & Cullin, M. J. (2003). Dynamic assessments of prospective teachers’ knowledge of models and modeling. Paper presented at the Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, Noordwijk, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, O., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, W., & Reiding, J. (1999). Public understanding of science as a separate subject in secondary schools in The Netherlands. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 711–719. Teachers’ personal knowledge about teaching models and modeling 1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher development and educational change. London: Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (2004). Rep I: Manual for research version 1.00. Cobble Hill, BC: Centre for Person-Computer Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. (1991). Understanding scientific reasoning (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt Rinehart & Winston .

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G. (2001). Models and PCK: Their relevance for practicing and preservice teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2007). Science teachers’ knowledge about teaching models and modeling in the context of a new syllabus on public understanding of science. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henze, I., van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2008). Development of experienced science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of models of the solar system and universe. International Journal of Research in Science Education, 30(10), 1321–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubermann, M. (1993). The model of an independent artisan in teachers’ professional relations. In J. Little, & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1273–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: W.W. Norton and Co. Inc. (Republished 1999. London: Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, C., Beijaard, D., & Kelchtermans, G. (1999). Perspectieven op de professinele identiteit van leraren [Perspectives on teachers’ professional identity]. Pedagogisch Tijdschrift, 24, 375–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of science: An empirical study of teachers’ views. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (1999). Exploring language teachers’ practical knowledge about teaching reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaz, M. (2009). Progressive transition in chemistry teachers’ understanding of nature of science based on historical controversies. Science & Education, 18, 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1993). Your nature of science profile: An activity for science teachers. School Science Review, 75, 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, M., & Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and science of constructivist research in teacher thinking. Teacher and Teacher Education, 9, 529–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. J. Biddle, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223–1296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Fransico: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1992). The fifth discipline. The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. L. G. (1980). On becoming a personal scientist: Interactive computer elicitation of personal models of the world. London: Academic .

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • SLO. (1996). Voorlichtingsbrochure havo/vwo Algemene Natuurwetenschappen [Information brochure on public understanding of science]. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge about models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1141–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/vealmak.html (ERIC document ED 443719.)

  • Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001). Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (2003). Learning about teacher learning: Reflections of a science educator. In: J. Wallace, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning (pp. 1–16). London : Routledge Falmer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (1992). Science teaching and teachers’ knowledge. Prospects for reform of elementary classrooms. Science Education, 76, 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigators. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituut Leraar en School (ILS)-Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Ineke Henze

  2. ICLON-Leiden University Graduate School of Teaching, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Jan H. van Driel

Authors
  1. Ineke Henze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan H. van Driel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ineke Henze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bahrain Teachers College, Manama, Bahrain

    Myint Swe Khine

  2. Bahrain Teachers College, Manama, Bahrain

    Issa M. Saleh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henze, I., van Driel, J.H. (2011). Science Teachers’ Knowledge About Learning and Teaching Models and Modeling in Public Understanding of Science. In: Khine, M., Saleh, I. (eds) Models and Modeling. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation