Skip to main content

Community Indicators in Action: Using Indicators as a Tool for Planning and Evaluating the Health and Wellbeing of a Community

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases V

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life Indicators ((CQLI,volume 3))

Abstract

Community indicators are summarized or aggregated statistics that include broad measures aimed at measuring the progress of a community but community indicator projects are often criticized for a lack of direct policy and planning actions. This chapter introduces Community Indicators Victoria, a community indicators project located within a southern state of Australia, and describes a successful collaboration with a local government authority in the development of a 4-year Municipal Public Health and Wellbeing Plan. The chapter describes a practical case study example of how community indicators can be used to develop informed, engaged and integrated community planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.communityindicators.net.au

  2. 2.

    CIV indicators included by the City of Ballarat are denoted in Appendices 1–5.

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). National Regional Profile, Ballarat (C) 2002–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Measures of Australia’s Progress: Summary Indicators 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, P., Lin, V., Sainsbury, P., Wise, M., Keating, T., & Roger, K. (2007). In what ways does the mandatory nature of Victoria’s municipal public health planning framework impact on the planning process and outcomes? Australia and New Zealand Health Policy, 4(4), doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-1184-1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D. (1998). State of environment reporting. In B. Nath, L. Hens, P. Compton, & N. Frumkin (Eds.), Environmental management in practice (Vol. 1, pp. 90–107). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugmann, J. (1997). Is there a method in our measurement? The use of indicators in local sustainable development planning. Local Environment, 2(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, L. (2009). Deliberative public participation and hexachlorobenzene stockpiles. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1636–1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • City of Ballarat. (2009). Our Health and Wellbeing Plan 2009–2013: Volume 1-The Plan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dluhy, M., & Swartz, N. (2006). Connecting knowledge and policy: The promise of community indicators in the United States. Social Indicators Research, 79, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giridharadas, A. (2009, November 20). Are metrics blinding our perception? New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferris, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., & Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hezri, A. A., & Dovers, S. R. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hezri, A. A., & Dovers, S. R. (2009). Australia’s indicator-based sustainability assessments and public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(3), 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, M. (2006). Revisiting the local impact of community indicators projects: Sustainable Seattle as prophet in its own land. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 253–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, M. (2009). Community interests and indicator system success. Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 429–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laverack, G. (2008). Empowerment and health promotion programming. Gesundheitswesen, 70(12), 736–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet, 365, 1099–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pencheon, D. (2008). The good indicators guide: Understanding how to use and choose indicators. UK: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. -P. (2009). Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress: Issues Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, D. (2001). Linking civic engagement and community improvement: A practitioner perspective on the communities movement. National Civic Review, 90(4), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Government Department of Human Services. (2007). Victorian Population Health Survey 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Marmot, M. (2003). Social determinants of health: The solid facts (2nd ed). Denmark: World Health Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J., Heine, W., Langworthy, A., McLean, N., Pyke, J., & Raysmith, H., et al. (2006). Developing a Community Indicators Framework for Victoria: The final report of the Victorian Community Indicators Project (VCIP). Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1946). Constitution of the World Health Organization. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie T. Davern .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Community Indicators Victoria Indicators included in the Domain of Healthy, Safe and Inclusive Communities

Policy area

Indicators

Measures

Personal health and wellbeing

Self-reported healtha,b

People self-reporting health as excellent or very good: expressed as a percentage of adult population

 

Subjective Wellbeinga

Personal Wellbeing Index: Australian Unity Wellbeing Index

 

Life expectancyb

Life expectancy at birth

 

Adequate physical exerciseb

People engaged in adequate physical activity: Time and sessions (regional)

 

Fruit Consumptionb

People meeting recommended intake levels (regional)

 

Vegetable Consumptionb

Consumption of recommended intake of fruit (regional)

 

Obesityb

Overweight or obese people according to Body Mass Index (self-assessed weight and height) (regional)

 

Smoking statusb

People who are current smokers (regional)

 

Risky Alcohol Consumptionb

People drinking at levels for long-term risk of harm (regional)

 

Illicit Drug Use

Percentage of population that use illicit drugs (regional)

 

Psychological Distress

People at risk of psychological distress according to Kessler 10 (regional)

Community connectedness

Feeling part of communitya,b

Satisfaction with feeling part of the community: Australian Unity Wellbeing Index

 

Social supportb

People who can get help from friends, family or neighbours when needed

 

Volunteeringb

People who help out as volunteers

 

Parental participation in schoolsb

Parents involved in activities at their children’s school

Early childhood

Early Childhood Development

Children who reach Australian Early Development Index targets

 

Child Health Assessmentsb

Key ages and stages Maternal and Child Health Visits at Age 3.5 Years

 

Immunizationb

Percentage of children fully immunized at age 12–15 months

 

Breastfeedingb

Children fully breastfed at 6 months of age

Personal and community safety

Perceptions of safetya,b

People who feel safe or very safe when at home alone during the day

  

People who feel safe or very safe when at home alone after dark

  

People who feel safe or very safe when walking alone in their local area during the day

  

People who feel safe or very safe when walking alone in their local area after dark

 

Crimeb

Recorded offences for crimes against the person

  

Recorded offences for crimes against property

 

Family violenceb

Recorded incidences of family violence

 

Road safetyb

Road traffic fatalities

  

Road traffic major injuries

 

Workplace safety

Measure under development

Lifelong learning

Home Internet Accessa,b

People with Internet access at home

  

People with broadband Internet access at home

 

Library usage

People with a library membership

 

Apprenticeships and vocational training enrolmentsb

People aged 25–64 years enrolled in vocational education and training

 

Destinations of school leaversb

People fully engaged in work or study

  

People not engaged at all in work or study

  

People employed full time

  

People studying full-time at a non-school institution

  

People not attending school and studying full time aged 15–19 years

 

School retention ratesb

People aged 17 years still attending secondary school

  

People aged 17 years not attending any educational institution

Service availability

Access to services

Measure under development

  1. aIndicator derived from the CIV Survey.
  2. bIndicators included by the City of Ballarat in their Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plan.

Appendix 2: Community Indicators Victoria Indicators included in the Domain of Dynamic, Resilient Local Economies

Policy Area

Indicators

Measures

Economic activity

Retained retail spending

Measure under development

 

Highly skilled workforceb

People employed in high skilled occupations (ANZSCO levels 1–3)

 

Business growth

Measure under development

Employment

Employment rateb

People who are employed and aged 15 years and over

 

Unemployment rateb

People who are unemployed

 

Local employmentb

People living and working in the same Local Government Area

Income and wealth

Incomeb

Median Equivalised Gross Weekly Household Income

 

Distribution of income

Ratio of 80th percentile to 20th percentile gross weekly household income

 

Per capita wealth

Measure under development

 

Financial stressb

People who could raise 2,000 dollars in 2 days in an emergency

 

Distribution of wealth

Measure under development

 

Food securitya, b

People who ran out of food in the last 12 months and could not afford to buy more

Skills

Educational qualificationsb

People aged 25 years and over who have a non-school qualification

  

People aged 25 years and over who have a bachelor degree or higher qualification

  

People aged 25 years and over with highest qualification level between certificate III and diploma

Work-life balance

Adequate work-life balancea, b

Employed people who disagree that their work and family life often interfere with each other

  1. aIndicator derived from the CIV Survey.
  2. bIndicators included by the City of Ballarat in their Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plan.

Appendix 3: Community Indicators Victoria Indicators Included in the Domain of Sustainable Built and Natural Environments

Policy Area

Indicators

Measures

Open Space

Access to areas of open space

Measure under development

 

Appearance of public spaceb

Measure under development

Housing affordability

Housing affordabilityb

Houses with housing costs 30% or more of gross income

  

Median house price

  

Median unit/flat/apartment price

  

Occupied private dwellings that are government-owned rental dwellings

Transport accessibility

Transport limitationsa, b

People who experienced transport limitations in the last 12 months

 

Public transport patronage

Measure under development

 

Dedicated walking and cycling trails

Measure under development

 

Practical non-car opportunities

Measure under development

 

Roads and footpaths

Satisfaction with local roads and footpaths

Sustainable energy use

Greenhouse gas emissions

Measure under development

 

Household energy use

Measure under development

 

Renewable energy use

Measure under development

Air quality

Air quality

Days exceeding NEPM guideline

Water

Condition of natural streams and waterways

Index of stream condition

 

Water consumption

Measure under development

 

Waste water recyclinga, b

Percentage of households who collect waste water

Biodiversity

Native vegetation cover

Measure under development

 

Carbon sequestration

Measure under development

 

Weeds and pests

Measure under development

Waste management

Household waste generationb

Non-recyclable garbage generated by households

 

Household waste recyclingb

Recyclables and green organics recycled households

  

Non-organic recyclable waste generated by households

  1. aIndicator derived from the CIV Survey
  2. bIndicators included by the City of Ballarat in their Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plan.

Appendix 4: Community Indicators Victoria Indicators Included in the Domain of Culturally Rich and Vibrant Communities

Policy Area

Indicators

Measures

Arts and cultural activities

Opportunities to participate in arts and cultural activitiesa, b

Opportunities to participate in arts and cultural activities

 

Participation in arts and cultural activitiesa, b

People who participated in arts and related activities in the last month

Sporting and recreational activities

Opportunities to participate in local sporting and recreational activities

Measure under development

 

Participation in sporting and recreational activities

Measure under development

Cultural diversity

Community is an accepting place for people from diverse cultures and backgroundsa, b

Percentage of people who agree that it is a good thing for a society to be made up of people from different cultures

  1. aIndicator derived from the CIV Survey.
  2. bIndicators included by the City of Ballarat in their Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plan.

Appendix 5: Community Indicators Victoria Indicators Included in the Domain of Democratic and Engaged Communities

Policy Area

Indicators

Measures

Citizen engagement

Opportunity to have a say on important issuesa, b

People who feel they have a say on important issues

 

Participation in citizen engagementa, b

People who participated in citizen engagement activities in the last 12 months

 

Women local councillorsb

Percentage of female local councillors

 

Opportunity to vote for a trustworthy political candidatea

People who agree that they are able to vote for a trustworthy political candidate

 

Membership of local community organizations and decision-making bodiesb

People who are members of a decision-making board or committee

  1. aIndicator derived from the CIV Survey.
  2. bIndicators included by the City of Ballarat in their Municipal Health and Wellbeing Plan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davern, M.T., West, S., Bodenham, S., Wiseman, J. (2011). Community Indicators in Action: Using Indicators as a Tool for Planning and Evaluating the Health and Wellbeing of a Community. In: Sirgy, M., Phillips, R., Rahtz, D. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases V. Community Quality-of-Life Indicators, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0535-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics