Skip to main content

Democratic Instructional Leadership in Australia, Denmark, and the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
US and Cross-National Policies, Practices, and Preparation

Part of the book series: Studies in Educational Leadership ((SIEL,volume 12))

Abstract

In this chapter, US, Danish, and Australian cases studies are used to illustrate how a focus on democratic instructional leadership as key to the success of school principals in the midst of accountability and neoliberal pressures. Drawing on extant literature on instructional in the United States, Denmark , and Australia as well as a model of leadership derived from the ISSPP case studies, principals are shown to have a significant, albeit primarily indirect, impact on teaching and learning. Specifically, successful instructional leaders influence the quality of instruction, curriculum design, assessment and student learning and enhance personal, professional, organizational, and community capacity. In all of the Australian and the US cases, broad outcomes are also evident, including student academic and non-academic achievement, as well as community social capital outcomes. Some of the cases, however, demonstrated a narrowing of the curriculum as a result of current accountability pressures to improve student achievement on state tests. The chapter concludes with an examination of the tension, dilemmas, and opportunities for “successful” instructional leadership in a global accountability environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Airey, J., Drewett Gray, J., & Flecknoe, M. (2004) Pupil agency in directing learning: A crossover trial. Paper presented at the 7th International BELMAS/SCRELM Research Conference, St. Catherine’s College, Oxford, 8–10 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R. (2002). Big brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum, 25th Anniversary (3rd edn.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. S. (2001). Teacher leader. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 443–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A., & Apple, M. W. (1999). The case for democratic schools. In M. W. Apple & J. A. Beane (Eds.), Democratic schools, lessons from chalk face. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasé, J., Blase, J., Anderson, G. L., & Dungan, S. (1995). Democratic principals in action. Eight pioneers. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. J., Gurr, D., Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1997). The schools of the future program in Victoria, Australia: The principal perspective. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy in education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flecknoe, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Densmore, K. (2003). Democratic educational leadership in contemporary times. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(2), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, C., Johnson, L., Brooks, S., & Jacobson, S. (2005). Building bridges, building community: Transformational leadership in a challenging urban context. Journal of School Leadership, 15(5), 519–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, C., Gordon, S., & Ross-Gordon, J. (2009). SuperVision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (8th edn.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Mulford, B. (2005). Models of successful principal leadership. School Leadership and Management, 26(4), 371–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, S., Johnson, L., Ylimaki, R., & Giles, C. (2005). Successful school leadership in changing times: Cross national findings in the third year of an international research project. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, S., Brooks, S., Giles, C., Johnson, L., & Ylimaki, R. (2007). Successful leadership in three high poverty urban elementary schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(4), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausen, K. K. (2001). Skulle det være noget særligt? [Is this supposed to be special?]. København: Børsen Offentlig ledelse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L. (1998). Building leadership capacity in schools. Alexandria: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2003). Pædagogisk ledelse—om ledelsesopgaven og relationerne i uddannelsesinstitutioner [Educational leadership—on the leadership task and relations in educational institutions]. Copenhagen: Børsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L. (2008). School leadership for ‘democratic building’: Fundamentalist beliefs or critical reflection? School Leadership and Management, 28(3), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, L., Krejsler, J., & Kofod, K. K. (2007). Meninger i ledelse—succesfuld skoleledelse mellem visioner og selvledelse [Senses in leadership—successful school leadership between visions and selfleadership]. Frederikshavn: Dafolo.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind Act. (2002). Stronger accountability for stronger results. www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml. Accessed 28 Sep 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, B. (2009). Victoria’s school reform agenda, Melbourne Graduate School of Education 2009 Dean’s lecture, June 3, 2009. www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/news/lectures/2009series.html. Accessed 14 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, P. (2001). Becoming political, too. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, P. A. (2005). Democratic leadership in education. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylimaki, R. M. (2007). Instructional leadership in challenging US schools. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylimaki, R., & McClain, L. (2009). Wisdom centered educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose M. Ylimaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ylimaki, R.M., Gurr, D., Moos, L., Kofod, K., Drysdale, L. (2011). Democratic Instructional Leadership in Australia, Denmark, and the United States. In: Ylimaki, R., Jacobson, S. (eds) US and Cross-National Policies, Practices, and Preparation. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 12. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0542-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics