Skip to main content

Predictive Validity

  • Reference work entry

Definition

Predictive validity is one approach of criterion validity that predicts individual performance on some measure scores administered at a later date.

Description

Predictive validity and concurrent validity are two approaches of criterion validity. Criterion validity describes how a test effectively estimates an examinee’s performance on some outcome measure(s). The outcome measure, called a criterion, is the main variable of interest in the analysis. The test scores are truly useful if they can provide a basis for precise prediction of some criteria. Predictive validity is similar to concurrent validity, as both of them are commonly interpreted as correlations between a test and the relevant criteria (McIntire and Miller 2005). Concurrent validity and predictive validity are only different in the time that the two tests are measured.

In predictive validity, the scores on a scale applied earlier are meant to predict scores on some later measure (Cronbach and Meehl 1955). For...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity for psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. S., Berthelot, J. M., Feeny, D., McFarland, B. H., Khan, S., & Orpana, H. (2007). The predictive validity of health-related quality of life measures: Mortality in a longitudinal population-based study. Quality of Life Research, 16(9), 1539–1546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. J., Singhapakdi, A., & Sirgy, M. J. (2007). Further validation of a need-based quality-of-work-life (QWL) measure: Evidence from marketing practitioners. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2(4), 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntire, S. A., & Miller, L. A. (2005). Foundations of psychological testing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, S. F., Rodrigue, J. R., Greene, A. F., & Mills, R. M. (1995). Predicting quality of life with a pretransplantation assessment battery: A prospective study of cardiac recipients. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2(4), 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Ling Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lin, WL., Yao, G. (2014). Predictive Validity. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2241

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2241

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics