Skip to main content

Ontological Categories in GOL

  • Chapter
Process Theories

Abstract

General Ontological Language (GOL) is a formal framework for representing and building ontologies. The purpose of GOL is to provide a system of top-level ontologies which can be used as a basis for building domain-specific ontologies. The present paper gives an overview about the basic categories of the GOL-ontology. GOL is part of the work of the research group Ontologies in Medicine (Onto-Med) at the University of Leipzig which is based on collaborative work of the Institute of Medical Informatics(IMISE) and the Institute for Computer Science (IfI). It represents work in progress toward a proposal for an integrated family of top-level ontologies and will be applied to several fields of medicine, in particular to the field of Clinical Trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle: 1984. The Complete Works, translated and edited by J. Barnes, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. and P. J. Hayes: 1989, ‘Moments and Points in an Interval-Based Temporal Logic’, Computational Intelligence 5, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Bradford Books, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, G., F. Clerin-Debart and P. Enjalbert: 2000. ‘A Qualitative Model for Time Granularity’, Computational Intelligence, pp. 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgo, S., N. Guarino and C. Masolo: 1996. ‘A Pointless Theory of Space Based On Strong Connection and Congruence’, in Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR96), Boston, MA. pp. 220–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G., J. Rumbauch and I. Jacobson: 1999. The Unified Modeling Language. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, F.: 1976. Philosophische Untersuchungen zu Raum, Zeit und Kontinuum. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag. English translation as Philosophical Investigations on Space, Time and Continuum. London: Croom Helm, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R. M.: 1983. ‘Boundaries as Dependent Particulars’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 20, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, W., H. Heller and H. Herre: 2001a. ‘Contributions for the Ontological Foundation of Knowledge Modelling’, Report Nr. 02. Institut für Informatik, Universität Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, W., H. Heller, H. Herre and B. Smith: 2001b. ‘GOL: A General Ontological Language’, Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Collected Papers from the Second International Conference. New York, pp.34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, W., H. Heller and H. Herre: 2002a. ‘GOL: A Framework for Building and Representing Ontologies’, in B. Heller, H. Herre and B. Smith (eds.), Ontological Spring (A Reader in Formal and Applied Ontology), IFOMIS Reports 1 Leipzig, pp. 182–203, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, W., B. Heller and H. Herre: 2003b. GOL-Manual (Version 1.0α) OntoMed-Report-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdös, P. and R. Rado: 1964. ‘A Partition Calculus in Set Theory’, Bull. Amer. Math. Society 15, 495–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesereth, M. R. and R. E. Fikes: 1992. Knowledge Interchange Format, Version 3.0, Reference Manual, Logic Group Report Logic-92-1, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. R.: 1995. ‘Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing’, International Journal of Human and Computer Studies 43, 907–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N.: 1998. ‘Formal Ontology and Information Systems’, In N. Guarino (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proc. of FOIS’ 98, Trento, Italy, Amsterdam, IOS-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N.: 1998. ’some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources’, First Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, N. and C. Welty: 2002. ‘Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean’, Communications of the ACM 45(2), 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guizzardi, G., H. Herre and G. Wagner: 2002a. ‘On the General Ontological Foundation of Conceptual Modelling’, in S. Spaccapeitra et al. (eds.), 2002. Conceptual Modelling, ER,Tampere, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Conceptual Modelling, vol. 2503, LNCS, 65–78. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guizzardi, G., H. Herre and G. Wagner: 2002b. ‘Towards Ontological Foundations for UML Conceptual Models’, in Meersmann et al. (eds.), International Conference ODBASE Irvine, California. LNCS vol. 2519, 1100–1117, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, B. and H. Herre: 2003a. ‘Formal Ontology and Principles of GOL’, OntoMed-Report-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, B., H. Herre and M. Löffler: 2003b. ‘Research Projects of Onto-Med’, OntoMed-Report-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, B., H. Herre and M. Löffler: 2003c. ‘Formal Specifications in GOL-A Case Study in the Field of Clinical Trials’, OntoMed-Report-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, B., K. Kühn and K. Lippoldt: 2003d. ‘OntoBuilder’, OntoMed-Report-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inwagen, P. V.: 2000. ‘Temporal Parts and Identity Across Time’, The Monist 89, 437–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, I.: 1989. Ontological Investigations. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K.: 1983. Collected Papers. Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musen, M.: 1992. ‘Dimensions of Knowledge Sharing and Reuse’, in Computer and Biomedical Research, vol. 25, pp. 435–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Podevin, R.: 2000. ‘Continuants and Continuity’, The Monist 83, 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel, S. and P. Norvig: 1995. Artificial Intelligence. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, J.: 1997. ‘Existence in Time: From Substance to Process’, in J. Faye et. al. (eds.), Perspectives in Time, pp. 143–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, J.: 2001. Formal Process Ontology. Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Collected Papers from the Second International Conference. New York, pp. 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, J.: 2003. ‘Process and Particulars’, in M. Weber (ed.), Process Metaphysics, Philosophia Verlag, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sider, T.: 2001. Four-Dimensionalism. An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.: 1994. ‘Particulars in Particular Clothing: Three Trope Theories of Substance’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LIV(3), 553–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.: 1998. ‘Farewell to Substance: A differentiated leave-taking’, Ratio (new series), pp. 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.: 2000. ‘How to Exist Without Temporal Parts’, Monist, pp. 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. and A. Varzi: 2000. ‘Bona Fide and Fiat Boundaries’, Philosophy and Phe-nomenological Research 60, 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. K.: 2000. Knowledge Representation. Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varzi, A. C.: 1996. ‘Parts, Wholes, and Part-Whole Relations: The Prospects of Mereoto-pology’, Data and Knowledge Engineering 20, 259–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varzi, A. C.: 1997. ‘Boundaries, Continuity, and Contact’, Nous 31, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welty, A. C. and D. A. Ferucci: 1999. ‘Instances and Classes in Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence’, Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heller, B., Herre, H. (2003). Ontological Categories in GOL. In: Seibt, J. (eds) Process Theories. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1044-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1044-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1751-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1044-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics