Skip to main content

Natural Disturbances and Early Successional Habitats

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustaining Young Forest Communities

Part of the book series: Managing Forest Ecosystems ((MAFE,volume 21))

Abstract

Largely a legacy of stand-replacing human disturbances, today’s central hardwood forests exhibit a narrower range of stand ages and structures than those in the presettlement landscape. Although natural disturbance types and frequencies vary within the region, large stand-replacing natural disturbances have always been infrequent; typical return intervals in excess of 100 years are longer than current forests have existed. Many present-day stands are dominated by early to mid-successional species in the overstory and late successional species in the understory; natural disturbances often serve to increase dominance of the understory late successional species, unless they are severe enough to disturb the canopy, forest floor, and soil. In any case, only the most severe natural disturbances or combinations of disturbances (including human disturbance) initiate large patches of early successional vegetation. Will the amount and spatial arrangement of early successional habitats created by natural disturbances be sufficient to meet management goals? We do not have the information to answer this question at present; the answer is further complicated by the potential effects of climate change on the rates and intensities of natural disturbances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Aikens ML, Ellum D, McKenna JJ, Kelty MJ, Ashton MS (2007) The effects of disturbance intensity on temporal and spatial patterns of herb colonization in a southern New England mixed-oak forest. For Ecol Manage 252:144–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RC, Fralish JS, Baskin JM (eds) (1999) Savannas, barrens, and rock outcrop plant communities of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Busing RT (2005) Tree mortality, canopy turnover, and woody detritus in old cove forests of the Southern Appalachians. Ecology 86:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busing RT, White RD, Harmon ME, White PS (2009) Hurricane disturbance in a temperate deciduous forest: patch dynamics, tree mortality, and coarse woody detritus. Plant Ecol 201(1):351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Changnon D, Bigley R (2005) Fluctuations in US freezing rain days. Clim Change 69:229–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton BD, Baker CR (2000) Catastrophic windthrow in the southern Appalachians: characteristics of pits and mounds and initial vegetation responses. For Ecol Manage 126:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins B, Battaglia LL (2002) Microenvironmental heterogeneity and Quercus michauxii regeneration in experimental gaps. For Ecol Manage 155:279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell CM, Hoalst-Pullen N, Jackson MT (2010) The limited role of canopy gaps in the successional dynamics of a mature mixed Quercus forest remnant. J Veg Sci 21:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Chantal M, Leinonen K, Kuuluvainen T, Cescatti A (2003) Early response of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings to an experimental canopy gap in a boreal spruce forest. For Ecol Manage 176:321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott KJ, Hitchcock SL, Krueger L (2002) Vegetation response to large scale disturbance in a southern Appalachian forest: hurricane opal and salvage logging. J Torrey Bot Soc 129:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn KM, Marks PL (2007) Agricultural legacies in forest environments: tree communities, soil properties, and light availability. Ecol Appl 17:452–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Fralish JS, McArdle TG (2009) Forest dynamics across three century-length disturbance regimes in the Illinois Ozark Hills. Am Midl Nat 162:418–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Francescato V, Scotton M, Zarin DJ, Innes JC, Bryant DM (2001) Fifty years of natural revegetation on a landslide in Franconia Notch, New Hampshire, USA. Can J Bot 79:1477–1485

    Google Scholar 

  • Frelich LE, Reich PB (1999) Neighborhood effects, disturbance severity, and community stability in forests. Ecosystems 2:151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi KJK, Herms DA (2010) Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol Invasions 12:389–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godt JW (1997) Digital representation of landslide overview map of the conterminous United States: US geological survey open-file report 97-289, scale 1:4,000,000. Available online at http://landslides.usgs.gov/html_files/landslides/nationalmap/national.html

  • Harrington TB, Bluhm AA (2001) Tree regeneration responses to microsite characteristics following a severe tornado in the Georgia Piedmont, USA. For Ecol Manage 140:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart JL, Grissino-Mayer HD (2008) Vegetation patterns and dendroecology of a mixed hardwood forest on the Cumberland Plateau: implications for stand development. For Ecol Manage 255:1960–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holladay C-A, Collins B, Kwit C (2006) Woody regeneration in and around aging southern bottomland hardwood forest gaps: effects of herbivory and gap size. For Ecol Manage 223:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnay O, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2002) Permeability of ancient forest edges for weedy plant species invasion. For Ecol Manage 161:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaus NA, Buehler DA, Saxton AM (2005) Forest management alternatives and songbird breeding habitat on the Cherokee National Forest, Tennessee. J Wildl Manage 69:222–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer JA, Runkle JR (1996) Early gap successional pathways in a Fagus-Acer forest preserve: pattern and determinants. J Veg Sci 7:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer CG (2001) Historical and ecological roles of disturbance in eastern North American forests: 9,000 years of change. Wildl Soc Bull 29:425–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlack GR (1994) Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge – trends in space and successional time. J Ecol 82:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward AA, Kraft CE (2004) Physical influences of landscape on a large-extent ecological disturbance: the northeastern North American ice storm of 1998. Landsc Ecol 19:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mou P, Warrillow MP (2000) Ice storm damage to a mixed hardwood forest and its impacts on forest regeneration in the ridge and valley region of southwestern Virginia. J Torrey Bot Soc 127:66–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myster RW, Fernandez DS (1995) Spatial gradients and patch structure on two Puerto Rican landslides. Biotropica 27:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Hurricane Center (2009) Historical North Atlantic tropical cyclone tracks, 1851–2008. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Services Center. Online_Linkage: http://maps.csc.noaa.gov/hurricanes/index.jsp

  • National Weather Service, Storm Prediction Center (2005) United States tornado touchdown points 1950–2004. National Atlas of the United States. Online_Linkage: http://nationalatlas.gov/atlasftp.html

  • Nowacki GJ, Abrams MD (1997) Radial-growth averaging criteria for reconstructing disturbance histories from presettlement-origin oaks. Ecol Monogr 67:225–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen W (2002) The history of native plant communities in the south. In: Wear D, Greis J (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. Gen Tech Rep SRS-53, USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Asheville

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson CJ, Leach AD (2008) Limited salvage logging effects on forest regeneration after moderate-severity windthrow. Ecol Appl 18:407–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MR (2004) Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Can J Bot 82:1273–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MR (2007) A conceptual model to characterize disturbance severity in forest harvests. For Ecol Manage 242:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme WH, Everham EH, Frelich LE, Moritz MA, Sparks RE (1998) Are large, infrequent disturbances qualitatively different from small, frequent disturbances? Ecosystems 1:524–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runkle JR (1982) Patterns of disturbance in some old-growth mesic forests in eastern North America. Ecology 63:1533–1546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ (2005) Severe wind and fire regimes in northern forests: historical variability at the regional scale. Ecology 86:431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trani MK, Brooks RT, Schmidt TL, Victor RA, Gabbard CM (2001) Patterns and trends of early successional forest in the eastern United States. Wild Soc Bull 29:413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Baker WL, Peterson CJ, Peet RK (1998) Factors influencing succession: lessons from large, infrequent natural disturbances. Ecosystems 1:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Level III and IV ecoregions of the coterminous United States. Western Ecology Division, US EPA, Corvallis. http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions.htm

  • US Forest Service (2006) LANDFIRE. Mean fire return interval. USDA Forest Service, Missoula. http://landfire.cr.usgs.gov

  • Walker LR, Velazquez E, Shiels AB (2009) Applying lessons from ecological succession to the restoration of landslides. Plant Soil 324:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White PS, Harrod J, Romme W, Betancourt J (1999) The role of disturbance and temporal dynamics. Chapter 2. In: Szaro RC, Johnson NC, Sexton WT, Malk AJ (eds) Ecological stewardship. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp 281–312

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter S. White .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix I: Base Maps of Natural Disturbances Within the Central Hardwood Region

Appendix I: Base Maps of Natural Disturbances Within the Central Hardwood Region

The map of Hurricane Density within the Central Hardwood Region was derived from line coverage of historical North Atlantic tropical cyclone tracks, 1851–2000 (NOAA 2009). The Landslide map was based on a spatial index of landslide susceptibility and occurrence (Godt 1997). Raster digital data for Mean Fire Return Interval were obtained from LANDFIRE (US Forest Service 2006). Tornado density was calculated in ArcGIS using United States tornado touchdown points 1950–2004 (NWS 2005). The map of ice storm potential (Freezing Rain) was derived by geo-referencing Fig. 3.1 (a map of the annual number of days with freezing rain as defined by 988 weather stations from 1948 to 2000) from Changnon and Bigley (2005)

figure a

.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, P.S., Collins, B., Wein, G.R. (2011). Natural Disturbances and Early Successional Habitats. In: Greenberg, C., Collins, B., Thompson III, F. (eds) Sustaining Young Forest Communities. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1620-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics