Abstract
This chapter argues that evidence about student performance is clearly essential for school leaders to successfully carry out their school improvement task. But such information provided by large-scale assessment is often fraught with limitations and is always woefully insufficient. Actually improving student performance also requires information of a very different order and the absence of this information in most schools greatly diminishes school leaders’ chances of success. Several types and sources of such evidence are proposed and illustrated in the chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alig-Mielcarek, J. M. (2003). A model of school success: Instructional leadership, academic press, and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
American Educational Research Association. (2000). Position statement of the American Educational Research Association concerning high-stakes testing in preK-12 education. Educational Researcher, 29(8), 24–25.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (103rd yearbook of the national society for the study of education) (pp. 20–50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40–44.
Creemers, B. (2007). Educational effectiveness and improvement: The development of the field in mainland Europe. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 223–241). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Creemers, B. P. M., & Reetzig, G. J. (1996). School level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(3), 197–228.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.
Earl, L. M. (2001). Data, data everywhere (and we don’t know what to do): Using data for wise decisions in schools. In P. de Broucker & A. Sweetman (Eds.), Towards evidence-based policy for Canadian education (pp. 39–51). Kingston, ON: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy, Queen’s University.
Fredericksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 363–407.
Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The dynamics of taking charge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Gagné, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
Goddard, R. D. (2003). Relational networks, social trust, and norms: A social capital perspective on students’ chance of academic success. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 59–74.
Goddard, R. D., & Goddard, Y. L. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 807–818.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507.
Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multi-level analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683–702.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.
Heubert, J., & Hauser, R. (Eds.). (1999). High stake tests: Testing for tracking, promotion and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The Globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jacob, J. A. (2004). A study of school climate and enabling bureaucracy in select New York City public elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Jurewicz, M. M. (2004). Organizational citizenship behaviors of middle school teachers: A study of their relationship to school climate and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, V. E., & Croninger, R. G. (1994). The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students. American Journal of Education, 102(3), 286–329.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. London, UK: DfES. Available at http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR800.pdf.
Leithwood, K., & Levin, B. (2005). Assessing school leader and leadership programme effects on pupil learning (RR662). Department for Education and Skills (DfES).
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership (pp. 22–47). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership Project. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (1995). Expert problem solving processes: Evidence from principals and superintendents. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Linn, R. (2003). Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 3–13.
Livingstone, D. W., Hart, D., & Davie, L. E. (2001). Public attitudes towards education in Ontario 2000: The 13th OISE/UT Survey. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
Livingstone, D. W., Hart, D., & Davie, L. E. (2003). Public attitudes towards education in Ontario 2002: The 14th OISE/UT Survey. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
Macmillan, R. (2000). Leadership succession, cultures of teaching and educational change. In N. Bascia & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change: Teaching, leading and the realities of reform (pp. 52–71). London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.
McDonnell, L. M. (2005). Assessment and accountability from the policy maker’s perspective. In J. Herman & E. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement (104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 35–54). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Mulford, B., Kendall, D., Edmunds, B., Kendall, L., Ewington, J., & Silins, H. (2007). Successful school leadership: What is it and who decides? Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 228–246.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Pitner, N. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 99–122). New York, NY: Longman.
Sackney, L. (2007). History of the school effectiveness and improvement movement in Canada over the past 25 years. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 167–182). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2007). Leadership and school effectiveness and improvement. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 635–658). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Stager, M., & Leithwood, K. (1989). Cognitive flexibility in principals’ problem solving. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 35(3), 217–236.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2007). A history of school effectiveness and improvement research in the USA focusing on the past quarter century. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 131–166). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(6), 395–420.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student achievement: The relationship between collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 189–209.
Walberg, H. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19–27.
Wilson, D. (2004). Assessment, accountability and the classroom: A community of judgment. In D. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 1–19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Wolfe, R., Childs, R., & Elgie, S. (2004). Final report of the external evaluation of the EQAO’s assessment process. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leithwood, K. (2011). School Leadership, Evidence-Based Decision Making, and Large-Scale Student Assessment. In: Webber, C., Lupart, J. (eds) Leading Student Assessment. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1727-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1727-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1726-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1727-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)