Skip to main content

School Leadership, Evidence-Based Decision Making, and Large-Scale Student Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leading Student Assessment

Part of the book series: Studies in Educational Leadership ((SIEL,volume 15))

Abstract

This chapter argues that evidence about student performance is clearly essential for school leaders to successfully carry out their school improvement task. But such information provided by large-scale assessment is often fraught with limitations and is always woefully insufficient. Actually improving student performance also requires information of a very different order and the absence of this information in most schools greatly diminishes school leaders’ chances of success. Several types and sources of such evidence are proposed and illustrated in the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alig-Mielcarek, J. M. (2003). A model of school success: Instructional leadership, academic press, and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association. (2000). Position statement of the American Educational Research Association concerning high-stakes testing in preK-12 education. Educational Researcher, 29(8), 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (103rd yearbook of the national society for the study of education) (pp. 20–50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. (2007). Educational effectiveness and improvement: The development of the field in mainland Europe. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 223–241). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M., & Reetzig, G. J. (1996). School level conditions affecting the effectiveness of instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(3), 197–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L. M. (2001). Data, data everywhere (and we don’t know what to do): Using data for wise decisions in schools. In P. de Broucker & A. Sweetman (Eds.), Towards evidence-based policy for Canadian education (pp. 39–51). Kingston, ON: John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy, Queen’s University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredericksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 363–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The dynamics of taking charge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GagnĂ©, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D. (2003). Relational networks, social trust, and norms: A social capital perspective on students’ chance of academic success. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D., & Goddard, Y. L. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 807–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multi-level analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heubert, J., & Hauser, R. (Eds.). (1999). High stake tests: Testing for tracking, promotion and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The Globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, J. A. (2004). A study of school climate and enabling bureaucracy in select New York City public elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurewicz, M. M. (2004). Organizational citizenship behaviors of middle school teachers: A study of their relationship to school climate and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E., & Croninger, R. G. (1994). The relative importance of home and school in the development of literacy skills for middle-grade students. American Journal of Education, 102(3), 286–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. London, UK: DfES. Available at http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR800.pdf.

  • Leithwood, K., & Levin, B. (2005). Assessing school leader and leadership programme effects on pupil learning (RR662). Department for Education and Skills (DfES).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership (pp. 22–47). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership Project. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (1995). Expert problem solving processes: Evidence from principals and superintendents. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. (2003). Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher, 32(7), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. W., Hart, D., & Davie, L. E. (2001). Public attitudes towards education in Ontario 2000: The 13th OISE/UT Survey. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D. W., Hart, D., & Davie, L. E. (2003). Public attitudes towards education in Ontario 2002: The 14th OISE/UT Survey. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, R. (2000). Leadership succession, cultures of teaching and educational change. In N. Bascia & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change: Teaching, leading and the realities of reform (pp. 52–71). London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, L. M. (2005). Assessment and accountability from the policy maker’s perspective. In J. Herman & E. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement (104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 35–54). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, B., Kendall, D., Edmunds, B., Kendall, L., Ewington, J., & Silins, H. (2007). Successful school leadership: What is it and who decides? Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 228–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitner, N. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 99–122). New York, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackney, L. (2007). History of the school effectiveness and improvement movement in Canada over the past 25 years. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 167–182). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2007). Leadership and school effectiveness and improvement. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 635–658). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stager, M., & Leithwood, K. (1989). Cognitive flexibility in principals’ problem solving. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 35(3), 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2007). A history of school effectiveness and improvement research in the USA focusing on the past quarter century. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 131–166). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. S. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(6), 395–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student achievement: The relationship between collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. (2004). Assessment, accountability and the classroom: A community of judgment. In D. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (103rd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 1–19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R., Childs, R., & Elgie, S. (2004). Final report of the external evaluation of the EQAO’s assessment process. Toronto, ON: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Leithwood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leithwood, K. (2011). School Leadership, Evidence-Based Decision Making, and Large-Scale Student Assessment. In: Webber, C., Lupart, J. (eds) Leading Student Assessment. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1727-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics