Skip to main content

Current State of Weed Management in Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automation: The Future of Weed Control in Cropping Systems

Abstract

Crop losses due to weeds result in reduced yields and quality and increases in harvest costs. Weed management often requires major resource inputs to produce a successful crop. Herbicides are central to the conventional approach to weed management, and they have allowed the grower to reduce management priority, time, effort, and cost of managing weeds. Their use has at times come at a price such as herbicide-resistant weeds, environmental damage, reduced water quality, and loss of genetic diversity. Although growers use a combination of management practices to control weeds, differences between those used in conventional agriculture compared to organic production systems often vary widely in their implementation and relative importance. Approaches to weed management within an organic system revolve around implementing a range of techniques, often consecutively over the course of the cropping rotation. For both organic and conventional growers, weed management remains a significant impediment to optimizing crop yield, improving crop quality, and reducing the costs of production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anon (2007) Experiences and outlook of Minnesota organic farmers. Minnesota Department of Agriculture. http://www.mda.state.mn.us/news/publications/food/organicgrowing/2007orgsurvresults.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2012

  • Anon (2010) Health and wellness trends report 2010. Natural Marketing Institute, Harleysville

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandeen et al (1979) Annual meeting of the Weed Science Society of America 1979 (Abstract), p 108

    Google Scholar 

  • Birzer T, Badgery W (2006) Organic wheat farming in Australia: issues farmers face. AFBM 3(2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman G (ed) (1997) Steel in the field; a farmer’s guide to weed management tools, Handbook series book 2. Sustainable Agriculture Network, National Agricultural Library, Beltsville

    Google Scholar 

  • Boydston RA, Mojtahedi H, Crosslin JM, Brown CR, Anderson T (2008) Effect of hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) presence on potato nematodes, diseases, and insect pests. Weed Sci 56:151–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bridges DC (1992) Crop losses due to weeds in the United States – 1992. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson RL (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerdeira AL, Duke SO (2006) The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: a review. J Environ Qual 35:1633–1658, Reviews and analyses

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conford P (2001) The origins of the organic movement. Floris Books, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts AS (1960) Weed control research: past, present and future. Weeds 8:535–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datamonitor (2011) Global: food, beverages and tobacco industry guide

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill GM, CaJacob CA, Padgette SR (2008) Glyphosate-resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations. Pest Manage Sci 64:326–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitri C, Oberholtzer L (2009) Marketing US organic foods: recent trends from farms to consumers, Economic information bulletin number 58. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Doohan D, Wilson R, Canales E, Parker J (2010) Investigating the human dimension of weed management: new tools of the trade. Weed Sci 58:503–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freed VH (1980) Weed science: the emergence of a vital technology. Weed Sci 28:621–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi LP, Reigner NP (2007) The value of herbicides in U.S. crop production. Weed Technol 21:559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green JM, Owen MDK (2011) Herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J Agric Food Chem 59:5819–5829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grube A, Donaldson D, Kiely T, Wu L (2011) Pesticide industry sales and usage: 2006 and 2007 market estimates. EPA’s Biological and Economic Analysis Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, U.S. EPA. http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/pestsales/07pestsales/market_estimates2007.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2011

  • GündoÄŸmus E (2006) Energy use on organic farming: a comparative analysis on organic versus conventional apricot production on small holdings in Turkey. Energy Conserv Manage 47:3351–3359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman (2007) The organic marketplace. The Hartman Group, Bellevue

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman Group (2010) Reimaging health and wellness: lifestyle and trends report 2010. The Hartman Group Inc. , Bellevue

    Google Scholar 

  • Heap I (2011) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed 14 July 2011

  • Huber B (2011) The world of organic agriculture: regulations and certification emerging trends 2011. Paper presented at BioFach Congress, Nürnberg, 16–19 February 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM (2005) International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements, Annual reports 2005–2006, Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM (2010) International federation of organic agricultural movements, annual report 2010, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen P, Merfield C (2006) Overview of organic agriculture. In: Kristiansen P, Taji A, Reganold J (eds) Organic agriculture, a global perspective. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen PE, Sindel BM, Jessop RS (2001) Weed control in organic horticultural cropping systems. In: Organic farming workshop, NSW Agriculture Centre for Organic Farming, Bathurst, 5–7 July 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurstjens DAG (2007) Precise tillage systems for enhanced non-chemical weed management. Soil Tillage Res 97:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanini WT (2010) Organic herbicides – do they work? Calif Weed Sci Soc J 6(1):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau DK, Bothwell SG (2008) Comparison of organic and conventional farms: challenging ecologists to make biodiversity functional. Front Ecol Environ 6:430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäder P, Fliebach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez SW (2007) The U.S. food marketing system: recent developments, 1997–2006, Report number 42. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann E, Sullivan S, Erickson D, De Young R (1997) Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: a comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environ Manage 21:747–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K, Campbell KG, Lyon S, Jones SS (2007) Evidence for varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crop Res 102:172–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy KM, Dawson JC, Jones SS (2008) Relationship among phenotypic growth traits, yield and weed suppression in spring wheat landraces and modern cultivars. Field Crops Res 105:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DL (1982) The abolition of El Cortito, the short handled hoe: a case study in social conflict and state policy in California agriculture. Soc Probl 30:26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen MDK, Zelaya IA (2005) Herbicide-resistant crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 61:301–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Hepperly P, Hanson J, Donds D, Seidel R (2005) Environmental, energetic and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55:573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard K, Halberg N, Kristensen ES (1998) Energy utilization in crop and diary production in organic and conventional livestock production systems. Agr Syst 57:599–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reganold JP, Glover JD, Andrew PK, Hinman HR (2001) Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 410:926–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadek NF, Oktarani YP (2009) Consumer knowledge and perception about organic food: a challenge for consumer education and the benefits of going organic. Asian J Food Agro-Ind, Special Issue S363–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil V (2001) Feeding the world: a challenge for the twenty first century. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolz H, Stolze M, Hamm U, Janssen M, Ruto E (2011) Consumer attitudes towards organic versus conventional food with specific quality attributes. Wagening J Life Sci 58:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanton CJ, Harker KN, Anderson RL (1993) Crop losses due to weeds in Canada. Weed Technol 7:537–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinton SM, Buhler DD, Forecella F, Gunsolus JL, King RP (1994) Estimation of crop yield loss due to interference by multiple weed species. Weed Sci 42:103–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson G (2000) International consumer demand for organic foods. HortTechnology 10:663–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons FL (1970) A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci 18:294–307

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA, ERS (2011) Economic Research Service. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-us/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption.aspx#.Ubi95ticGVI. Accessed 6 June 2013

  • van der Schans D, Bleeker P (eds) (2006) Practical weed control in arable farming and outdoor vegetable cultivation without chemicals, Publication number 352. Applied Plant Research, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchia AV, Gilliom RJ, Sullivan DJ, Lorenz DL, Martin JD (2009) Trends in concentrations and use of agricultural herbicides for Corn Belt Rivers, 1996–2006. Environ Sci Technol 43:9096–9102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walz E (1999) Final results of the third biennial national organic farmers’ survey. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer H, Kilcher L (eds) (2011) The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2012. FIBL-IFOAM report. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer H, Kilcher L (eds) (2012) The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2012. FIBL-IFOAM report. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams MM II, Boydston RA (2005) Alternative to hand-weeding volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) in carrot (Daucus carota). Weed Technol 19:1050–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams MM II, Ransom CV, Thompson WM (2007) Volunteer potato density influences critical time of weed removal in bulb onion. Weed Technol 21:136–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yim FS, Williams MM II, Pataky JK, Davis AS (2009) Principal canopy factors of sweet corn and relationships to competitive ability with wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Weed Sci 57:296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimdahl RL (2000) My view. Weed Sci 48:663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alec F. McErlich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McErlich, A.F., Boydston, R.A. (2014). Current State of Weed Management in Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems. In: Young, S., Pierce, F. (eds) Automation: The Future of Weed Control in Cropping Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7512-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics