Skip to main content

Causality and Agency in the Philosophy of Thomas Reid

  • Chapter
The Philosophy of Thomas Reid

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 42))

Abstract

I shall be concerned here with two doctrines which are essential to Reid’s account of agency and of causation. The first, expounded at some length in AP I, v, is that, so far as we can tell, only beings with will and understanding can exercise active power. The second, avowed at many points in Reid’s writings, is that there must be an efficient cause for everything that comes into existence. Since Reid believes that only a being that exercises active power can truly be called a cause, these doctrines taken together have far reaching consequences in metaphysics, in the philosophy of science and in the philosophy of religion, as well as in the theory of action. They imply that material things cannot be genuinely active and thus cannot be regarded as causes in the truest sense of the word. Conversely only spiritual beings can be efficient causes and everything which happens must result ultimately from the agency of God, of man or of some other such being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Madden (1982, pp. 313–341).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yolton (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. AP I, v (Works pp. 522–3); cf. Locke (1975, pp. 233–6).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corr (Works pp. 56–60).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Corr (Works pp. 66, 67 & 83–84).

    Google Scholar 

  6. IP VI, vi (Works pp. 455–7); AP I, ii (Works p. 516); I, vi (Works p. 521); I, v (Works p. 524); IV, ii (Works p. 603); IV, iii (Works p. 608); Corr (Works pp. 75, 82 & 84).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corr (Works p. 75). Cf., e.g., Corr (Works pp. 82, 84); AP I, v (Works p. 524); IV, ii (Works p. 603).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke (1738, II, p. 524).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke (1738, II, pp. 551–2).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke (1738, II, p. 552).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stalley, R.F. (1989). Causality and Agency in the Philosophy of Thomas Reid. In: Dalgarno, M., Matthews, E. (eds) The Philosophy of Thomas Reid. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2338-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2338-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7552-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2338-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics