Skip to main content

Digital Methods for Change Detection in Medical Images

  • Chapter
Information Processing in Medical Imaging

Abstract

The detection and visualisation of the changes between two images is the basis or the goal of several imaging techniques. Thus, digitized subtraction angiography consists in visualizing the differences between two images obtained without and with iodine contrast, intravenously injected. In Nuclear Medicine, the comparison of two scintigraphic images of the same organ explored under varying conditions (images acquired at different times, with different tracers, after various physiological or pharmacological interventions) is a routine problem. The visual comparison of the images is often a difficult task for the following reasons: The differences can be too low to be visually identified. In certain types of images, there are normal statistical fluctuations which can mask or simulate a difference. The gray level intensities can be different in the images which must be first normalized. Therefore, it seems reasonable to use the capacities of a computer and the knowledge about the count fluctuations to perform an automated comparison of the images. Better performances than those given by the visual inspection can be expected from such a procedure. To form this comparison, it is necessary to first register the images (alignment, normalization, magnification,…) (1,2,3,4,5) and second detect the changes by analyzing the images point by point (6,7).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnea DI, Silverman HF. 1972. A class of algorithms for fast digital image Registration. IEEE C21, 353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pratt WK. 1974. Correlation techniques of image registration. IEEE AES10, 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Svedlow M, Mc Gillem CD, Anuta PE. 1978. Image registration: similarity measure and preprocessing method comparisons. IEEE AES14, 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lillestrand RL. 1972. Techniques for change detection. IEEE C21, 654–659.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Appledorn CR, Oppenheim BE, Wellman HN. 1980. An automated method for the alignment of image pairs. J. Nucl. Med., 21, 165–167.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eghbali H. 1979. K-S test for detecting changes from Landsat imagery data. IEEE SMC9, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barnard ST, Thompson WB. 1980. Disparity analysis of images. IEEE PAMI2, 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Venot A, Lebruchec JF, Golmard JL, Roucayrol JC. 1983. An automated method for the normalization of scintigraphic images. J. Nucl. Med., 24, 529–531.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Venot A, Lebruchec JF, Golmard JL, Roucayrol JC. 1983. Digital methods for change detection in scintigraphic images. J. Nucl. Med., 24, p67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Venot A, Lebruchec JF, Roucayrol JC. 1983. A new class of similarity measures for robust image registration. Submitted to Computer vision, graphics and image processing.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Draper NB, Smith H. 1966. Applied regression analysis. John Wiley and sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibbons JD. 1971. Non parametric statistical inference. Mc Graw Hill. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen G, Wagner LK, Rauschkolb EN. 1982. Evaluation of a digital subtraction angiography unit. Radiology, 144, 613–617.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pavlidis T. 1982. Algorithms for graphics and image processing. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Himmelblau DM. 1972. Applied non linear programming. Mc Graw Hill. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richalet J, Rault A, Pouliquen R. 1971. Identification des processus par la methode du modèle. Gordon and Breach. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Towards global optimization 1 and 2. 1978. Dixon LCW, Szegö GP Eds. North Holland. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maszi SF, Bekey GA, Safford FB. 1976. An adaptative random search method for identification of large scale non linear systems. 4th IFAC Symposium on identification and system parameter estimation. Tbilisi.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bekey GA, Ung MT. 1974. A comparative evaluation of two global search algorithms. IEEE SMC4, 112–116.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lehmann EL. 1959. Testing statistical hypothesis. John Wiley and sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kendall M, Stuart A. 1979. The advanced theory of statistics 2. Griffin. London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Venot, A. et al. (1984). Digital Methods for Change Detection in Medical Images. In: Deconinck, F. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6045-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6045-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6047-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6045-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics