Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Language Library ((SLAP,volume 15))

Abstract

My concern in this paper is the syntax and semantics of purpose-clauses in English. The relation of this problem to the question of the nature of syntactic representation is that the topics I will discuss raise interesting questions about what one might not want to include as explicit parts of either a syntactic or a semantic representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aune, Bruce (1977) Reason and Action, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon (1979) ‘Control in Montague Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 10, 515–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon (1980) ‘Tenses and Aspects as Functions on Verb-Phrases’, in C. Rohrer, ed., Time, Tense, and Quantifiers, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 19–37.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon (1981) ‘Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics,’ in P. Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon and Barbara H. Partee (1980) ‘Anaphora and Semantic Structure’, Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brame, Michael (1978) Base-generated Syntax, Noit Amrofer Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnan, Joan (1978) ‘A Realistic Transformational Grammar’, in Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan, and George A. Miller, eds., Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1975) Reflections on Language, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, Max J. (1978) ‘Prepositions and Points of View’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David R. (1972) Studies in the Logic of Verb Aspect and Time Reference in English, unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David R. (1979) Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David R. (this volume) ‘Grammatical relations and Montague grammar.’

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraci, Robert A. (1974) Aspects of the Grammar of Infinitives and FOR-phrases, unpublished doctoral dissertation, M. I. T.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D., J. A. Fodor, and M. Garrett (1975) ‘The Psychological Unreality of Semantic Representations’, Linguistic Inquiry 6, 515–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. and J. D. Fodor (1980) ‘Functional Structure, Quantifiers, and Meaning Postulates’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 759–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, Gerald (this volume) ‘Phrase structure grammar.’

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray S. (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward L. and Leonard M. Faltz (1978) ‘Logical Types for Natural Language,’ U. C. L. A. Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, Robert B. (1960) The Grammar of English Nominalizations, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard (1974) Formal Philosophy, ed. by Richmond Thomason, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H. (1979) ‘Montague Grammar, Mental Representations, and Reality’, in P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein, eds., Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis) pp. 195–208. (Reprinted in Philosophy and Grammar, S. Öhman and S. Kanger, eds., D. Reidel, Dordrecht.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H. and Emmon Bach (1980) ‘Quantification, Pronouns, and VP Anaphora’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof, eds., Formal Methods in the Study of Language: Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Kenneth (1980) Parsing English Phrase Structure, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solan, Lawrence (1978) ‘On the Interpretation of Missing Complement NP’s’, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, George (1963) Norm and Action, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin (1980) ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bach, E. (1982). Purpose Clauses and Control. In: Jacobson, P., Pullum, G.K. (eds) The Nature of Syntactic Representation. Synthese Language Library, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7707-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7707-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1290-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7707-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics