Skip to main content

Ordination as a Tool for Analyzing Complex Data Sets

  • Chapter
Classification and Ordination

Part of the book series: Advances in vegetation science ((AIVS,volume 2))

Abstract

Ordination, or indirect gradient analysis, has been widely used in plant ecology as a tool for examining relationships between environment and vegetation. Since the classic work of Bray & Curtis (1957) which popularized such applications, the mathematical models underlying ordination methodology have become increasingly sophisticated. Principal Components Analysis provided increased conceptual rigor and objectivity. The realization that the assumptions of linearity implicit in PCA were not consistent with representation of nonlinear species responses along environmental gradients (Beals 1973, Jeglum, Wehrhahn & Swan 1971, Whittaker & Gauch 1973) led to introduction of a series of nonlinear methods including Reciprocal Averaging, RA, (Hill 1973, 1974), Gaussian Ordination, GO, (Gauch, Chase & Whittaker 1974, Ihm & Groenewoud 1975) and Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling, NMDS, (Fasham 1977, Prentice 1977). Subsequent comparative studies (e. g., Fasham 1977, Gauch, Whittaker & Singer 1980) have suggested these nonlinear methods to consistently and accurately recover the structure of simulated data.

The author gratefully acknowledges the continuing collaboration of Dr. Norman L. Christensen of Duke University. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants DEB-7708743 and DEB-7804043 to R.K.P. and DEB-7707532 and DEB-7804041 to N.L.C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beals, E.W. 1973. Ordination: Mathematical elegance and ecological naivete. J. Ecol. 61: 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J.R. & J.T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M.B. 1980. Syntactic basis for classification. In: E. van der Maarel (ed.), Advances in vegetation science: Classification and Ordination. Vegetatio 42: 111–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasham, M.J.R. 1977. A comparison of nonmetric multidimensional scaling, principal components and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines, and coenoplanes. Ecology 58: 551–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G., G.B. Chase & R.H. Whittaker. 1974. Ordination of vegetation samples by Gaussian species distributions. Ecology 55: 1382–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G., R.H. Whittaker & S.B. Singer. 1980. A comparative study of nonmetric ordinations. J. Ecol. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: An eigenvector method of ordination. J. Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. C. 23: 340–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O., R.G.H. Bunce & M.W. Shaw. 1975. Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland. J. Ecol. 63: 597–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihm, P. & H. van Groenewoud. 1975. A multivariate ordering of vegetation data based on Gaussian-type gradient response curves. J. Ecol. 63: 767–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeglum, J.K., C.F. Wehrhahn & J.M.A. Swan. 1971. Comparisons of environmental ordinations with principal component ordinations for sets of data having different degrees of complexity. Can. J. For. Res. 1: 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosting, H.J. 1942. An ecological analysis of the plant communities of piedmont, North Carolina. Amer. Midi. Nat. 28: 1–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R.K. & N.L. Christensen. 1979. Hardwood forest vegetation of the North Carolina piedmont. Veroff. Geobot. Inst. ETH, Stiftung Rübel, 1979 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R.K. & N.L. Christensen. 1980. Succession: a population process. In E. van der Maarel (ed.), Advances in vegetation science: Succession. Vegetatio 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, I.C. 1977. Non-metric ordination methods in ecology. J. Ecol. 65: 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. & H.G. Gauch. 1973. Evaluation of ordination techniques. In: R.H. Whittaker (ed.), Ordination and classification of plant communities, p. 287–321. Junk, The Hague.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Eddy van der Maarel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Dr. W. Junk bv Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peet, R.K. (1980). Ordination as a Tool for Analyzing Complex Data Sets. In: van der Maarel, E. (eds) Classification and Ordination. Advances in vegetation science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9197-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9197-2_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9199-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9197-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics