Skip to main content

Stationary and Nonstationary Learning Characteristics of the LMS Adaptive Filter

  • Conference paper
Aspects of Signal Processing

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series ((ASIC,volume 33-1))

Abstract

This paper describes the performance characteristics of the LMS adaptive filter, a digital filter composed of a tapped delay line and adjustable weights, whose impulse response is controlled by an adaptive algorithm. For stationary stochastic inputs, the mean-square error, the difference between the filter output and an externally supplied input called the “desired response,” is a quadratic function of the weights, a paraboloid with a single fixed minimum point that can be sought by gradient techniques. The gradient estimation process is shown to introduce noise into the weight vector that is proportional to the speed of adaptation and number of weights. The effect of this noise is expressed in terms of a dimensionless quantity “misadjustment” that is a measure of the deviation from optimal Wiener performance. Analysis of a simple nonstationary case, in which the minimum point of the error surface is moving according to an assumed first-order Markov process, shows that an additional contribution to misadjustment arises from “lag” of the adaptive process in tracking the moving minimum point. This contribution, which is additive, is proportional to the number of weights but inversely proportional to the speed of adaptation. The sum of the misadjustments can be minimized by choosing the speed of adaptation to make equal the two contributions. It is further show, in Appendix A, that for stationary inputs the LMS adaptive algorithm, based on the method of steepest descent, approaches the theoretical limit of efficiency in terms of misadjustment and speed of adaptation when the eigenvalues of the input correlation matrix are equal or close in value. When the eigenvalues are highly disparate (λmaxmin > 10), an algorithm similar to LMS but based on Newton’s method would approach this theoretical limit very closely.

Copyright 1976 by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.; reprinted with permission from Proceedings of the IEEE, August 1976. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant ENGR 74-21752.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Widrow and M. E. Hoff, “Adaptive switching circuits,” in 1960 WESCON Conv. Rec., pt. 4, pp. 96–140.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Nilsson, Learning Machines. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Koford and G. Groner, “The use of an adaptive threshold element to design a linear optimal pattern classifier,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-12, pp. 42–50, Jan. 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Widrow, P. Mantey, L. Griffiths, and B. Goode, “Adaptive antenna systems,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 55, pp. 2143–2159, Dec. 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Widrow, “Adaptive Filters,” in Aspects of Network and System Theory, R. Kalman and N. DeClaris, Eds. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1971, pp. 563–587.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. P. Applebaum, “Adaptive arrays,” Special Projects Lab., Syracuse Univ. Res. Corp., Rep. SPL 769.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. J. Griffiths, “A simple adaptive algorithm for real-time processing in antenna arrays,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 57, pp. 1696–1704, Oct. 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. O. L. Frost III, “An algorithm for linearly constrained adaptive array processing,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 60, pp. 926–935, Aug. 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. F. Gabriel, “Adaptive arrays-An introduction,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 64, pp. 239–272, Feb. 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. W. Smith, “Design of quasi-optimal minimum-time controllers,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-11, pp. 71–77, Jan. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Widrow, “Adaptive model control applied to real-time blood-pressure regulation,” in Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Proc. Japan-U.S. Seminar on the Learning Process in Control Systems, K. S. Fu, Ed. New York: Plenum Press, 1971, pp. 310–324.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Lucky, “Automatic equalization for digital communication,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 44, pp. 547–588, Apr. 1965.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. DiToro, “A new method of high-speed adaptive serial com-munication through any time-variable and dispersive trans-mission medium,” in Conf. Record, 1965 IEEE Annual Communi-cations Convention, pp. 763–767.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Lucky and H. Rudin, “An automatic equalizer for general- purpose communication channels,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 46, pp. 2179–2208, Nov. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Lucky et al., Principles of Data Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Gersho, “Adaptive equalization of highly dispersive channels for data transmission,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 48, pp. 55–70, Jan. 1969.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Soudhi, “An adaptive echo canceller,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 46, pp. 497–511, Mar. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Widrow et al., “Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 63, pp. 1692–1716, Dec. 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. E. Mantey, “Convergent automatic-synthesis procedures for sampled-data networks with feedback,” Stanford Electronics Laboratories, Stanford, CA, TR no. 7663 - 1, Oct. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. M. Lion, “Rapid identification of linear and nonlinear systems,” in Proc. 1966 JACC, Seattle, WA, pp. 605–615, Aug. 1966; also AIAA Journal, vol. 5, pp. 1835–1842, Oct. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. E. Ross and G. M. Lance, “An approximate steepest descent method for parameter identification,” in Proc. 1969 JACC, Boulder, CO, pp. 483–487, Aug. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Hastings-James and M. W. Sage, “Recursive generalized- least-squares procedure for online identification of process parameters,” Proc. IEE, vol. 116, pp. 2057–2062, Dec. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. C. Soudack, K. L. Suryanarayanan, and S. G. Rao, “A uni¬fied approach to discrete-time systems identification,” Int. J. Control, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1009–1029, Dec. 1971.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Schaufelberger, “Der Entwurf adaptiver Systeme nach der direckten Methode von Ljapunov,” Nachrichtentechnik, Nr. 5, pp. 151–157, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. M. Mendel, Discrete Techniques of Parameter Estimation: The Equation Error Formulation. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. J. Merhav and E. Gabay, “Convergence properties in linear parameter tracking systems,” Identification and System Parameter Estimation-Part 2, Proc. 3rd IFAC Symp., P. Eyk- hoff, Ed. New York: American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., 1973, pp. 745–750.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. V. Southwell, Relaxation Methods in Engineering Science. New York: Oxford, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. J. Wilde, Optimum Seeking Methods. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Widrow, “Adaptive sampled-data systems,” in Proc. First Intern. Cong. Intern. Federation of Automatic Control, Moscow, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. Robbins, and S. Monro, “A stochastic approximation method,” Ann. Math. Statist., vol. 22, pp. 400–407, 1951.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Dvoretzky, “On stochastic approximation,” in Proc. Third Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist, and Probability, J. Neyman, Ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1956, pp. 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Makhoul, “Linear prediction: A tutorial review,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 63, pp. 561–580, Apr. 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. L. J. Griffiths, “Rapid measurement of digital instantaneous frequency,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-23, pp. 207–222, Apr. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Y. T. Chien, K. S. Fu, “Learning in non-stationary environment using dynamic stochastic approximation,” in Proc. 5th Allerton Conf. Circuit and Systems Theory, pp. 337–345, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  35. T. P. Daniell and J. E. Brown III, “Adaptation in nonstation¬ary applications,” in Proc. 1970 IEEE Symp. Adaptive Processes (9th), Austin, TX, paper no. XXIV-4, Dec. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. D. Davisson, “Steady-state error in adaptive mean-square minimization,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-16, pp. 382–385, July 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  37. T. J. Schonfeld and M. Schwartz, “A rapidly converging first- order training algorithm for an adaptive equalizer,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. IT-17, pp. 431–439, July 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  38. K. H. Mueller, “A new, fast-converging mean-square algorithm for adaptive equalizers with partial-response signaling,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 54, pp. 143–153, Jan. 1975.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. L. J. Griffiths and P. E. Mantey, “Iterative least-squares algorithm for signal extraction,” in Proc. Second Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, Western Periodicals Co., pp. 767–770, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Widrow, B., McCool, J., Larimore, M.G., Johnson, C.R. (1977). Stationary and Nonstationary Learning Characteristics of the LMS Adaptive Filter. In: Tacconi, G. (eds) Aspects of Signal Processing. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 33-1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1223-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1223-2_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-1225-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-1223-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics