Skip to main content
  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

Temple’s interpretation of history begins with an examination of the historical process itself, of the task which confronts the historian in his attempt to understand this process, and of the human forces which operate within history. The historical order, however, can only be understood in terms of its relation to the eternal order; hence, the meaning of eternity and the mutual effect of eternity and time on each other must be explored. A final question is posed and a tentative answer suggested regarding the possibility of individual personality surviving both death and the end of history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Temple, Nature, Man and God, p. 205. The influence of Josiah Royce is evident here; cf. The World and the Individual, II, 145: “In our own experience of a time-span of consciousness we have the analogy of eternal consciousness when expanded indefinitely.”

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Chapter 11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Temple, Nature, Man and God, p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See ibid., p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See ibid., pp. 428–429.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 428.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid. For a similar interpretation on this point see W. H. Walsh, An Introduction to Philosophy of History (London: Hutchinson’s University Library, 1951), pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Temple, Christus Veritas, p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See ibid., pp. 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See ibid., pp. 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Temple, Personal Religion..., p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Temple, Christus Veritas, p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid. Toynbee seems to agree at this point; cf. Arnold J. Toynbee, Civilization on Trial (New York: Oxford University Press, 1948), pp. 260–263.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Also a similar view is presented by John Baillie, The Belief in Progress (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1951), pp. 211–220, 227–235. However, both Toynbee and Baillie conceive of history as revealing a greater unfolding of grace, at least in the sense of general influence and wider opportunity.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Christus Veritas, pp. 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Padgett, J.F. (1974). The Historical Process. In: The Christian Philosophy of William Temple. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2042-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2042-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1610-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2042-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics