Skip to main content
  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

Before the presentation of Temple’s suggested synthesis to the epistemological problem, it may be well to review briefly the problem as he has developed it. Descartes’ emphasis on the self isolated from everything else and, thus, necessarily dependent on its own ideas for knowledge of the world has been shown to be fallacious. But it is not desirable nor possible to return to the naïve realism prevalent in the medieval period which claimed that the mind is directly aware of real objects in experience and gains direct knowledge of the world. The latter represents the thesis in the triadic attempt to solve the problems of epistemology revealed in the history of thought, of which Descartes’ proposal is the antithesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Temple, Nature, Man and God, p. 107. The position developed by Temple in the Gifford Lectures (see Lectures V, VI, VIII) would seem to represent a further explication of the views on knowledge expressed in Mens Creatrix, pp. 27–90, 153–161. On some issues the latter source is the more complete one.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mens Creatrix, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Temple, Nature, Man and God, p. 126. See also ibid., pp. 151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nature, Man and God, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., ρ. 126. The problem of the unity and identity of the self is raised explicitly, and Temple’s solution proposed, in Chap. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nature, Man and God, p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See ibid., p. 128. See also Mens Creatrix, pp. 51, 74, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nature, Man and God, p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Temple, Mens Creatrix, p. 274.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., pp. 147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Nature, Man and God, p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Temple, Nature, Man and God, p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Temple, Mens Creatrix, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Temple, Nature, Man and God, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mens Creatrix, p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Truth is conceived as scientific truth here; see ibid., p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See ibid., p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Plato and Christianity, pp. 71–72; also see ibid., pp. 38–39, and Nature, Man and God, p. 250.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Padgett, J.F. (1974). The Understanding of Reality. In: The Christian Philosophy of William Temple. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2042-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2042-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-247-1610-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2042-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics