Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 33))

Abstract

The word ‘deontic’ is derived from the Greek word ‘δεóυτως’, which may be translated ‘as it should be’ or ‘duly’. Bentham uses ‘deontology’ for “the science of morality”, and Ernst Mally [30] was the first to use the term — in the form Deontik — to refer to logical study of the normative use of language. In accordance with Bolzano and Quine’s definition of logical truth, deontic logic can be defined as the study of those sentences in which only logical words and normative expressions occur essentially.1 Normative expressions include the words ‘obligation’, ‘duty’, ‘permission’, ‘right’, and related expressions. These expressions may be termed deontic words, and sentences involving them deontic sentences.2 A deontic sentence is a truth of deontic logic if it is true and remains true for all variations of its non-logical and non-deontic words (that is, expressions which are not logical or deontic words). Deontic logic is closely related to the logic of imperatives (or the logic of commands); in fact, many authors regard these fields as essentially the same.3 What is here called deontic logic has also been referred to as logic of obligation and logic of norms (or logic of normative systems).4

Section I-V of this paper are written by Risto Hilpinen on the basis of lecture-notes by Dagfinn Føllesdal; section VI-IX are written independently by Risto Hilpinen.

This work has been supported by grants from the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Suomen Kulttuurirahasto) and the Finnish National Research Council for Social Sciences (Valtion yhteiskuntatieteellinen toimikunta).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Alan Ross, The Formal Analysis of Normative Systems (Technical Report No. 2, Contract No. SAR/Nonr-609 (16), Office of Naval Research, Group Psychology Branch), New Haven 1956. Reprinted in The Logic of Decision and Action (ed. by N. Rescher), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1967, pp.147–213.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, Alan Ross, ‘A Reduction of Deontic Logic to Alethic Modal Logic’, Mind 67 (1958) 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, Alan Ross, ‘Some Nasty Problems in the Formal Logic of Ethics’, Nous 1 (1967) 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, Alan Ross, ‘Comments on von Wright’s “Logic and Ontology of Norms”’, in Philosophical Logic (ed. by J. W. Davis, D. J. Hockney, and W. K. Wilson), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, ‘Imperative Inference’, Analysis 26 (1966) 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Broad, C. D., ‘Imperatives, Categorical & Hypothetical’, The Philosopher 2 (1950) 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castañeda, Hector-Neri, ‘The Logic of Obligation’, Philosophical Studies 10 (1959) 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chisholm, Roderick M., ‘Contrary-to-duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic’, Analysis 24 (1963) 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawson, E. E., ‘A Model for Deontic Logic’, Analysis 19 (1959) 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feys, Robert, Modal Logics (ed. with some complements by J. Dopp), Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, Mark, ‘A Logical Theory of Commanding’, Logique et Analyse 4 (1961) 154–169.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gombay, André, ‘Imperative Inference and Disjunction’, Analysis 25 (1965) 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grelling, Kurt, ‘Zur Logik der Sollsätze’, Unity of Science Forum, January 1939, 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grice, H. P., ‘The Causal Theory of Perception’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol.35 (1961); reprinted in Perceiving, Sensing and Knowing (ed. by R. Swartz), Doubleday and Co., New York, 1965, pp. 438–472.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hanson, W. H., ‘Semantics for Deontic Logic’, Logique et Analyse 8 (1965) 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hansson, Bengt, ‘An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics’, Nous 4 (1970) 373–398. Reprinted in this volume, pp. 121-147.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hilpinen, Risto, Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic (Acta Philosophica Fennica 22), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hilpinen, Risto, ‘An Analysis of Relativised Modalities’, in Philosophical Logic (ed. by J. W. Davis, D. J. Hockney and W. K. Wilson), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hintikka, Jaakko, Quantifiers in Deontic Logic (Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Litter arum 23:4), Helsinki 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘Deontic Logic and Its Philosophical Morals’, in Models for Modalities. Selected Essays (by J. Hintikka), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1970, pp. 184–214.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hofstadter, Albert and McKinsey, J. C. C, ‘On the Logic of Imperatives’, Philosophy of Science 6 (1939) 446–457.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judical Reasoning (ed. by W. W. Cook), Yale University Press, New Haven, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M., An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuenand Co., London 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jørgensen, Jørgen, ‘Imperatives and Logic’, Erkenntnis 7 (1937-8) 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kanger, Stig, New Foundations for Ethical Theory, Stockholm 1957. Reprinted in this volume, pp. 36–58.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kanger, Stig and Kanger, Helle, ‘Rights and Parliamentarism’, Theoria 32 (1966) 85–115.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kripke, Saul Aaron, ‘Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I: Normal Modal Propositional Calculi’, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9 (1963) 67–96.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kripke, Saul Aaron, ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’, Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal and Many-Valued Logics (Acta Philosophica Fennica 16), Helsinki 1963, pp. 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Levi, Isaac, Gambling with Truth, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mally, Ernst, Grundgesetze des Sol lens. Elemente der Logik des Willens. Leuschner & Lubensky, Graz, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Menger, Karl, Moral, Wille und Weltgestaltung. Grundlegung der Logik der Sitten, Wien 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Menger, Karl, ‘A Logic of the Doubtful. On Optative and Imperative Logic’, Reports of a Mathematical Colloquium 2 (Notre Dame University, Indiana University Press), 1939, pp. 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Montague, Richard, ‘Logical Necessity, Physical Necessity, Ethics, and Quantifiers’, Inquiry 4 (1960) 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Montague, Richard, ‘Pragmatics’, in Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. 1: Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics (ed. by R. Klibansky), La Nuova Italia Editrice, Firenze, 1968, pp. 102–122.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Prior, A. N., ‘The Paradoxes of Derived Obligation’, Mind 63 (1954) 64–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Prior, A. N., ‘Escapism: The Logical Basis of Ethics’, in Essays in Moral Philosophy (ed. by A. I. Melden), University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1958, pp. 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Prior, A. N., Formal Logic (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Quine, W. V. O., ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’, in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (ed. by P. A. Schilpp), Open Court, La Salle, I11., 1963, pp. 385–106.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rand, Rose, ‘Logik der Forderungssäe’, Revue internationale de la théorie du droit 1 (1939) 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Reach, Karl, ‘Some Comments on Grelling’s Paper “Zur Logik der Sollsätze”’, Unity of Science Forum, April 1939, p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rescher, Nicholas, ‘An Axiom System for Deontic Logic’, Philosophical Studies 9 (1958) 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rescher, Nicholas, ‘Conditional Permission in Deontic Logic’, Philosophical Studies 13 (1962) 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rescher, Nicholas and Robinson, John, ‘Can One Infer Commands from Commands?’, Analysis 24 (1964) 176–179.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ross, Alf, ‘Imperatives and Logic’, Theoria 7 (1941) 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stenius, Erik, ‘Principles of a Logic of Normative Systems’, in Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal and Many-Valued Logics (Acta Philosophica Fenrdca 16), Helsinki 1963, pp. 247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  46. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘Deontic Logic’, Mind 60 (1951) 1–15. Reprinted in Logical Studies (by G. H. von Wright), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1957, pp. 58-74.

    Google Scholar 

  47. von Wright, Georg Henrik, An Essay in Modal Logic, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  48. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘A Note on Deontic Logic and Derived Obligation’, Mind 65 (1956) 507–509.

    Google Scholar 

  49. von Wright, Georg Henrik, Norm and Action, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  50. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘A New System of Deontic Logic’, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 1 (1964) 173–182. Reprinted in this volume, pp. 105-115.

    Google Scholar 

  51. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘A Correction to a New System of Deontic Logic’, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 2 (1965) 103–107. Reprinted (in part) in this volume, pp. 115-120.

    Google Scholar 

  52. von Wright, Georg Henrik, An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action (Acta Philosophica Fennica 21), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  53. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘The Logic of Practical Discourse’, in Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. 1: Logic and Foundations of Mathematics (ed. by R. Klibansky), La Nuova Italia Editrice, Firenze, 1968, pp. 141–167.

    Google Scholar 

  54. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘On the Logic and Ontology of Norms’, in Philosophical Logic (ed. by J. W. Davis, D. J. Hockney, and W. K. Wilson), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Åqvist, Lennart, ‘Interpretations of Deontic Logic’, Mind 73 (1964) 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Åqvist, Lennart, ‘On Dawson-models for Deontic Logic’, Logique et Analyse 7 (1964) 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Åqvist, Lennart, ‘Choice-Offering and Alternative-Presenting Disjunctive Commands’, Analysis 25 (1965) 182–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Føllesdal, D., Hilpinen, R. (1970). Deontic Logic: An Introduction. In: Hilpinen, R. (eds) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Synthese Library, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3146-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3146-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1302-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3146-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics