Abstract
The word ‘deontic’ is derived from the Greek word ‘δεóυτως’, which may be translated ‘as it should be’ or ‘duly’. Bentham uses ‘deontology’ for “the science of morality”, and Ernst Mally [30] was the first to use the term — in the form Deontik — to refer to logical study of the normative use of language. In accordance with Bolzano and Quine’s definition of logical truth, deontic logic can be defined as the study of those sentences in which only logical words and normative expressions occur essentially.1 Normative expressions include the words ‘obligation’, ‘duty’, ‘permission’, ‘right’, and related expressions. These expressions may be termed deontic words, and sentences involving them deontic sentences.2 A deontic sentence is a truth of deontic logic if it is true and remains true for all variations of its non-logical and non-deontic words (that is, expressions which are not logical or deontic words). Deontic logic is closely related to the logic of imperatives (or the logic of commands); in fact, many authors regard these fields as essentially the same.3 What is here called deontic logic has also been referred to as logic of obligation and logic of norms (or logic of normative systems).4
Section I-V of this paper are written by Risto Hilpinen on the basis of lecture-notes by Dagfinn Føllesdal; section VI-IX are written independently by Risto Hilpinen.
This work has been supported by grants from the Finnish Cultural Foundation (Suomen Kulttuurirahasto) and the Finnish National Research Council for Social Sciences (Valtion yhteiskuntatieteellinen toimikunta).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Anderson, Alan Ross, The Formal Analysis of Normative Systems (Technical Report No. 2, Contract No. SAR/Nonr-609 (16), Office of Naval Research, Group Psychology Branch), New Haven 1956. Reprinted in The Logic of Decision and Action (ed. by N. Rescher), University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1967, pp.147–213.
Anderson, Alan Ross, ‘A Reduction of Deontic Logic to Alethic Modal Logic’, Mind 67 (1958) 100–103.
Anderson, Alan Ross, ‘Some Nasty Problems in the Formal Logic of Ethics’, Nous 1 (1967) 345–360.
Anderson, Alan Ross, ‘Comments on von Wright’s “Logic and Ontology of Norms”’, in Philosophical Logic (ed. by J. W. Davis, D. J. Hockney, and W. K. Wilson), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 108–113.
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, ‘Imperative Inference’, Analysis 26 (1966) 79–82.
Broad, C. D., ‘Imperatives, Categorical & Hypothetical’, The Philosopher 2 (1950) 62–75.
Castañeda, Hector-Neri, ‘The Logic of Obligation’, Philosophical Studies 10 (1959) 17–23.
Chisholm, Roderick M., ‘Contrary-to-duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic’, Analysis 24 (1963) 33–36.
Dawson, E. E., ‘A Model for Deontic Logic’, Analysis 19 (1959) 73–78.
Feys, Robert, Modal Logics (ed. with some complements by J. Dopp), Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1965.
Fisher, Mark, ‘A Logical Theory of Commanding’, Logique et Analyse 4 (1961) 154–169.
Gombay, André, ‘Imperative Inference and Disjunction’, Analysis 25 (1965) 58–62.
Grelling, Kurt, ‘Zur Logik der Sollsätze’, Unity of Science Forum, January 1939, 44–47.
Grice, H. P., ‘The Causal Theory of Perception’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol.35 (1961); reprinted in Perceiving, Sensing and Knowing (ed. by R. Swartz), Doubleday and Co., New York, 1965, pp. 438–472.
Hanson, W. H., ‘Semantics for Deontic Logic’, Logique et Analyse 8 (1965) 177–190.
Hansson, Bengt, ‘An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics’, Nous 4 (1970) 373–398. Reprinted in this volume, pp. 121-147.
Hilpinen, Risto, Rules of Acceptance and Inductive Logic (Acta Philosophica Fennica 22), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1968.
Hilpinen, Risto, ‘An Analysis of Relativised Modalities’, in Philosophical Logic (ed. by J. W. Davis, D. J. Hockney and W. K. Wilson), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 181–193.
Hintikka, Jaakko, Quantifiers in Deontic Logic (Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes Humanarum Litter arum 23:4), Helsinki 1957.
Hintikka, Jaakko, ‘Deontic Logic and Its Philosophical Morals’, in Models for Modalities. Selected Essays (by J. Hintikka), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1970, pp. 184–214.
Hofstadter, Albert and McKinsey, J. C. C, ‘On the Logic of Imperatives’, Philosophy of Science 6 (1939) 446–457.
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judical Reasoning (ed. by W. W. Cook), Yale University Press, New Haven, 1919.
Hughes, G. E. and Cresswell, M., An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuenand Co., London 1968.
Jørgensen, Jørgen, ‘Imperatives and Logic’, Erkenntnis 7 (1937-8) 288–296.
Kanger, Stig, New Foundations for Ethical Theory, Stockholm 1957. Reprinted in this volume, pp. 36–58.
Kanger, Stig and Kanger, Helle, ‘Rights and Parliamentarism’, Theoria 32 (1966) 85–115.
Kripke, Saul Aaron, ‘Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I: Normal Modal Propositional Calculi’, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9 (1963) 67–96.
Kripke, Saul Aaron, ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’, Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal and Many-Valued Logics (Acta Philosophica Fennica 16), Helsinki 1963, pp. 83–94.
Levi, Isaac, Gambling with Truth, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1967.
Mally, Ernst, Grundgesetze des Sol lens. Elemente der Logik des Willens. Leuschner & Lubensky, Graz, 1926.
Menger, Karl, Moral, Wille und Weltgestaltung. Grundlegung der Logik der Sitten, Wien 1934.
Menger, Karl, ‘A Logic of the Doubtful. On Optative and Imperative Logic’, Reports of a Mathematical Colloquium 2 (Notre Dame University, Indiana University Press), 1939, pp. 53–64.
Montague, Richard, ‘Logical Necessity, Physical Necessity, Ethics, and Quantifiers’, Inquiry 4 (1960) 259–269.
Montague, Richard, ‘Pragmatics’, in Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. 1: Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics (ed. by R. Klibansky), La Nuova Italia Editrice, Firenze, 1968, pp. 102–122.
Prior, A. N., ‘The Paradoxes of Derived Obligation’, Mind 63 (1954) 64–65.
Prior, A. N., ‘Escapism: The Logical Basis of Ethics’, in Essays in Moral Philosophy (ed. by A. I. Melden), University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1958, pp. 135–146.
Prior, A. N., Formal Logic (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1962.
Quine, W. V. O., ‘Carnap and Logical Truth’, in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (ed. by P. A. Schilpp), Open Court, La Salle, I11., 1963, pp. 385–106.
Rand, Rose, ‘Logik der Forderungssäe’, Revue internationale de la théorie du droit 1 (1939) 308–322.
Reach, Karl, ‘Some Comments on Grelling’s Paper “Zur Logik der Sollsätze”’, Unity of Science Forum, April 1939, p. 72.
Rescher, Nicholas, ‘An Axiom System for Deontic Logic’, Philosophical Studies 9 (1958) 24–30.
Rescher, Nicholas, ‘Conditional Permission in Deontic Logic’, Philosophical Studies 13 (1962) 1–6.
Rescher, Nicholas and Robinson, John, ‘Can One Infer Commands from Commands?’, Analysis 24 (1964) 176–179.
Ross, Alf, ‘Imperatives and Logic’, Theoria 7 (1941) 53–71.
Stenius, Erik, ‘Principles of a Logic of Normative Systems’, in Proceedings of a Colloquium on Modal and Many-Valued Logics (Acta Philosophica Fenrdca 16), Helsinki 1963, pp. 247–260.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘Deontic Logic’, Mind 60 (1951) 1–15. Reprinted in Logical Studies (by G. H. von Wright), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1957, pp. 58-74.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, An Essay in Modal Logic, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1951.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘A Note on Deontic Logic and Derived Obligation’, Mind 65 (1956) 507–509.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, Norm and Action, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1963.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘A New System of Deontic Logic’, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 1 (1964) 173–182. Reprinted in this volume, pp. 105-115.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘A Correction to a New System of Deontic Logic’, Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 2 (1965) 103–107. Reprinted (in part) in this volume, pp. 115-120.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, An Essay in Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action (Acta Philosophica Fennica 21), North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1968.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘The Logic of Practical Discourse’, in Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. 1: Logic and Foundations of Mathematics (ed. by R. Klibansky), La Nuova Italia Editrice, Firenze, 1968, pp. 141–167.
von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘On the Logic and Ontology of Norms’, in Philosophical Logic (ed. by J. W. Davis, D. J. Hockney, and W. K. Wilson), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, 1969, pp. 89–107.
Åqvist, Lennart, ‘Interpretations of Deontic Logic’, Mind 73 (1964) 246–253.
Åqvist, Lennart, ‘On Dawson-models for Deontic Logic’, Logique et Analyse 7 (1964) 14–21.
Åqvist, Lennart, ‘Choice-Offering and Alternative-Presenting Disjunctive Commands’, Analysis 25 (1965) 182–184.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1970 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Føllesdal, D., Hilpinen, R. (1970). Deontic Logic: An Introduction. In: Hilpinen, R. (eds) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Synthese Library, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3146-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3146-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1302-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3146-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive