Skip to main content

Representing Writing: External Representations and the Writing Process

  • Chapter
Computers and Writing

Abstract

The aim of this paper is, first, to provide a synthesis and critique of contemporary explanations of writing as a cognitive process and, second, to extend these explanations by examining the means by which a writer creates a text through interaction with external resources and media, such as books, notes, pencil and paper, and the ways in which the representational properties of these resources affect the process of idea generation and written composition. We suggest that observed writing strategies can be described as a sequence of transitions between different representational spaces and that the choice of writing medium constrains the process of writing and influences the construction of these representations. We conclude by mentioning the implications of this analysis for the teaching of writing and the design of computer-based writing support tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983) The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1987) The Psychology of Written Composition.. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridwell-Bowles, L., Johnson, P. Brehe, S. (1987) Composing and computers: case studies of experienced writers. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed) Writing in Real Time: Modelling Production Processes. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, J. N. (1970) Language and Learning. Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. and Gentner, D. (1980) A framework for a cognitive theory of writing. In L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Ed) Cognitive Processes in Writing: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. R. and Greenbaum, S. (1986) Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches. Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. R. and Matsuhashi, A. (1983) A theory of the writing process. In M. MartIew (Ed) The Psychology of Written Language. John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. S. and Hayes, J. R. (1980) The dynamics of composing: making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg (Ed) Cognitive Processes in Writing: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, C. H. and Dominic, J. F. (1981) Writing: The Nature, Development and Teaching of Written Communication.. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, L. W. and Steinberg, E. R. (Eds) (1980) Cognitive Processes in Writing: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. and Branthwaite, A. (1989) The psychologist as wordsmith: a questionnaire study of the writing strategies of productive British psychologists.. Higher Education, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R. and Flower, L. S., (1980) Writing as problem solving. Visible Language, XIV (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuhashi, A. (Ed) (1987) Writing in Real Time: Modelling Production Processes. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. (Ed) (1982) What Writers Know. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, L. and Sharples, M. (1988) Textual structures in a Writer’s Assistant. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Technology and Education, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (1985) Cognition, Computers and Creative Writing. Ellis Horwood, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. and O’Malley, C. (1987) A framework for the design of a Writer’s Assistant. In J. Self (Ed) Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning: Intelligent Computer-Aided Instruction. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Goodlet, J. and Pemberton, L. (1989) Developing a Writer’s Assistant. In N. Williams and P. Holt (Eds) Computers and Writing: Models and Tools. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, N. (1980) Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers, College Composition and Communication, 31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Intelect Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharples, M., Pemberton, L. (1992). Representing Writing: External Representations and the Writing Process. In: Holt, P.O., William, N. (eds) Computers and Writing. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2854-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2854-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-1858-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2854-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics