Abstract
A spherical harmonic expansion of tectonic plate motions on the Earth requires both poloidal and toroidal harmonics. Each spectrum decays fairly uniformly as ℓ-2 (ℓ is the spherical harmonic degree), and the toroidal-poloidal ratio of the degree power is between 0.5 and 1.0 for all degrees up to 128. Convection in a laterally homogeneous medium will excite only poloidal motions; hence the question of why the toroidal component of plate motion is so large. Numerical models of 3-D convection with surface plates show that the rheological heterogeneity represented by plate boundaries can account for the excitation of toroidal surface motions from an underlying poloidal convective flow. Plates also account for the ℓ-2 decay of the spectra, which is a simple geometric consequence of the plate-like velocity field. Lateral viscosity variations can also account for the net rotation of the lithosphere in the hot spot reference frame; this requires order of magnitude lateral viscosity variations. The spectra of plate motions depends on the geometries of the plates as well as their relative motions. A Monte Carlo simulation of plate motions shows that the observed toroidal-poloidal ratio for all degrees is less than would be expected for most plate motions, given the existing geometry. Relatively simple numerical models of 3-D convection with surface plates evolve to a final steady state (when it exists) that minimizes the toroidal-poloidal ratio of plate motion. This suggests that the much more complex system of plates on the Earth may be similarly governed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chappie, W. M., and T. E. Tullis, Evaluation of the forces that drive the plates, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 1967–1984, 1977.
Davies, G. F., Mantle convection under simulated plates: effects of heating modes and ridge and trench migration, and implications for the core-mantle boundary, bathymetry, the geoid and Benioff zones, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 84, 153–183, 1986.
DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus and S. Stein, Current plate motions, Geophys. J. Int., 101, 425–478, 1990.
Forsyth, D. and S. Uyeda, On the relative importance of the driving forces of plate motion, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 43, 163–200, 1975.
Forte, A. M., and W. R. Peltier, Plate tectonics and aspherical earth structure: the importance of poloidal-toroidal coupling, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 3645–3679, 1987.
Forte, A. M., and W. R. Peltier, Gross Earth data and mantle convection: New inferences of mantle viscosity, in Glacial Isostasy, Sea Level and Mantle Rheology, ed by R. Sabadini and K. Lambeck (this volume), 1990.
Gable, C. W., Numerical models of plate tectonics and mantle convection in three dimensions, PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge MA, 1989.
Gable, C. W., R. J. O’Connell and B. J. Travis, Convection in three dimensions with surface plates: Generation of toroidal flow, J. Geophys. Res., in press, 1990.
Hager, B. H. and R. J. O’Connell, Subduction zone dip angles and flow driven by plate motion, Tectonophysics, 50, 111–133, 1978.
Hager, B. H., and R. J. O’Connell, Kinematic models of large-scale flow in the Earth’s mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 1031–1048, 1979.
Hager, B. H., and R. J. O’Connell, A simple global model of plate dynamics and mantle convection, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 4843–4867, 1981.
Hager, B. H. and R. W. Clayton, Constraints on the structure of mantle convection using seismic observations, flow models and the geoid, in Mantle Convection, Plate Tectonics and Global Dynamics, ed. by W.R. Peltier, Gordon and Breach, New York, 657–763, 1989.
Kaula, W. M. and D. R. Williams, Transformations of velocity fields on a spherical surface, in Geodesy in Transition, ed. by K. P. Schwarz and G. Lachapelle, University of Calgary, Alberta, 177–183, 1983.
Minster, J. B., and T. H. Jordan, Present-day plate motions, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 5331–5354, 1978.
Minster, J. B., and T. H. Jordan, Present-day plate motions: A summary, in Source Mechanism and Earthquake Prediction, ed. by C. J. Allégre, Editions CNRS, Paris, 109–124, 1980.
Morgan, W. J., Plate motions and deep mantle convection, Geol. Soc. Amer. Memoir 132, 7–21, 1972.
Morse, P. M. and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953.
Olson, P., and G. M. Coreos, A boundary layer model for mantle convection with surface plates, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 62, 195–219, 1980.
Press, W. H., B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1986.
Ricard, Y., and C. Vigny, Mantle dynamics with induced plate tectonics, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 17543–17560, 1989.
Richter, F. M., Dynamical models of sea floor spreading, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 11, 223–287, 1973.
Richter, F. M., and D. P. McKenzie, Simple plate models of mantle convection, J. Geophys., 44, 441–471, 1978.
Turcotte, D. L. and E. R. Oxburgh, Mantle convection and the new global tectonics, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 4, 33–68, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Connell, R.J., Gable, C.W., Hager, B.H. (1991). Toroidal-Poloidal Partitioning of Lithospheric Plate Motions. In: Sabadini, R., Lambeck, K., Boschi, E. (eds) Glacial Isostasy, Sea-Level and Mantle Rheology. NATO ASI Series, vol 334. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3374-6_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3374-6_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5492-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3374-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive