Skip to main content

An Exposition and Development of Kanger’s Early Semantics for Modal Logic

  • Chapter
The New Theory of Reference

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 270))

Abstract

Stig Kanger — born of Swedish parents in China in 1924 — was professor of Theoretical Philosophy at Uppsala University from 1968 until his death in 1988. He received his Ph.D. from Stockholm University in 1957 under the supervision of Anders Wedberg. Kanger’s dissertation, Provability in Logic, was remarkably short, only 47 pages, but also very rich in new ideas and results. By combining Gentzen-style techniques with a model theory à la Tarski, Kanger obtained new and simplified proofs of central metalogical results of classical predicate logic: Gödel’s completeness theorem, Löwenheim-Skolem’s theorem and Gentzen’s Hauptsatz. The part that had the greatest impact, however, was the 15 pages devoted to modal logic. There Kanger developed a new semantic interpretation for quantified modal logic which had a close family resemblance to semantic theories that were developed around the same time by Jaakko Hintikka, Richard Montague and Saul Kripke (independently of each other and independently of Kanger).

*

Earlier versions ofthis paper have been presented at the UgLLI-workshop on Philosophical Logic at Uppsala University, March 18, 1995, at the Swedish national conference in philosophy, “Filosofidagarna”, Umeä, June 7-9, 1995, and discussed with friends and colleagues. A shorter version was also published as Lindström (1996). I am especially indebted to Joseph Almog, Lennart Aqvist, Thorild Dahlquist, Bengt Hansson, Risto Hilpinen, Jaakko Hintikka, Paul Needham, Peter Pagin, Wlodek Rabinowicz, Krister Segerberg and Rysiek Sliwinski for their very helpful comments and advice. A fellowship at the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Studies in the Social Seiences (SCASSS) du ring the Autumn of 1996 provided an excellent research environment for finishing the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barcan, (Marcus), R.: 1946a, ‘A Functional Calculus of First Order Based on Strict Implication’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcan, (Marcus), R.: 1946b, ‘The Deduction Theorem in a Functional Calculus of First Order Based on Strict Implication’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11, 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcan, (Marcus), R.: 1947, ‘The Identity of Individuals in a Strict Functional Calculus of Second Order’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12, 12–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1985, ‘Nominalist Platonism’, The Philosophical Review, XCIV(3), 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1946, ‘Modalities and Quantification’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11, 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1947, Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Second edition with supplements, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N.: 1975, ‘On the Primary and Secondary Semantics of Logical Necessity’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etchemendy, J.: 1990, The Concept of Logical Consequence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fϕllesdal, D.: 1994, ‘Stig Kanger in Memoriam’, in D. Prawitz and Westerståhl, D. (eds), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, IX, 885–888. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, J.W.: 1984, ‘Quantification in Modal Logic’, in D. Gabbay and Guenthener, F. (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, II, 249–307. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1957a, ‘Quantifiers in Deontic Logic’, Societas Scientiarum Fennica, Commentationes humanarium litterarum, 23(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1957b, ‘Modality as Referential Multiplicity’, Ajatus, 20, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1961, ‘Modality and Quantification’, Theoria, 27, 110–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1969,’ semantics for Propositional Attitudes’, in J.W. Davies et al. (eds), Philosophical Logic, 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Reidel, Dordrecht. Reprinted in J. Hintikka, Models for Modalities.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969; and in L. Linsky (ed), Reference and Modality. Oxford University Press, London, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1980, ‘Standard vs. Nonstandard Logic: Higher-Order, Modal, and First-Order Logics’, in E. Agazzi (ed), Modern Logic-A Survey. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1989, ‘Is Alethic Modal Logic Possible?’, in J. Hintikka and M.B. Hintikka (eds), The Logic of Epistemology and the Epistemology of Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G.E. and M.J. Cresswell.: 1996, A New Introduction to Modal Logic. Routledge, London and New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, B. and A. Tarski.: 1951, ‘Boolean Algebras with Operators’, American Journal of Mathematics, 73, 891–939; 74, 127-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S.: 1957a, Provability in Logic, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, Stockholm Studies in Philosophy 1, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S.: 1957b, ‘The Morning Star Paradox’, Theoria, 23, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S.: 1957c, ‘A Note on Quantification and Modalities’, Theoria, 23, 133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S.: 1957d, ‘On the Characterization of Modalities’, Theoria, 23, 152–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S.: 1970, New Foundations for Ethical Theory, in Hilpinen (ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, Reidel, 36–58. Earlier mimeographed version: New Foundations for Ethical Theory, Part 1, Stockholm, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanger, S.: 1972, ‘Law and Logic’, Theoria, 38, 105–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1986, ‘Opacity’, in Hahn and Schilpp (eds), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine, The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. XVIII, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S.C.: 1967, Mathematical Logic, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisel, G.: 1969, ‘Informal Rigour and Completeness Proofs’, in I. Lakatos (ed), Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1959, ‘A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1963a, ‘Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’, Acta Philosophica Fennica, fasc. 16, Helsinki, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1963b, ‘Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I, Normal Propositional Calculi’, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logic und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 9, 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1965, ‘Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic II, Non-Normal Propositional Calculi’, in I.W. Addison, L. Henkin and A. Tarski (eds), The Theory of Models. North Holland, Amsterdam, 206–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1985, On the Plurality of Worlds. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, S.: 1996, ‘Modality Without Worlds: Kanger’s Early Semantics for Modal Logic’, in Odds and Ends, Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz on the Occasion of His Fiftieth Birthday, Uppsala Philosophical Studies, 45, Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, V.: 1992, ‘Two Problems with Tarski’s Theory of Consequence’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, new series, 92, 273–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1960, ‘Logical Necessity, Physical Necessity, Ethics and Quantifiers’, Inquiry, 4, 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.: 1947, ‘The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12, 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1936, ‘Über den Begriff der logischen Folgerung’, Actes du Congres International de Philosophie Scientifique, 7, 1–11. (English translation: ‘On the Concept of Logical Consequence’, 409-420 in Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, second edition, Hackett Indianapolis, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindström, S. (1998). An Exposition and Development of Kanger’s Early Semantics for Modal Logic. In: Humphreys, P.W., Fetzer, J.H. (eds) The New Theory of Reference. Synthese Library, vol 270. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5250-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5250-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5578-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5250-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics