Skip to main content

Priority updating procedures in dynamic job shop simulation studies: the impact on measures of performance under different due date assignment rules

  • Chapter
Disaggregation
  • 192 Accesses

Abstract

In job shop simulation studies the effects of local priority dispatching rules have been studied extensively. Among these, due-date oriented priority rules (such as slack, slack/remaining operation, critical ratio) have been found to be effective and useful in practice. These priority dispatching rules are dynamic in nature, that is, the state of the priority entity changes continuously over time. Therefore, one should theoretically update the priorities of jobs waiting in a queue every time a machine at a work center becomes available. This is an extremely costly procedure even in experimental simulation studies.

Some researchers have tried a static version of these rules: the priority is calculated only when an operation arrives at a work center and joins the queue.

In this paper we study a slightly more dynamic version of this rule: in addition to calculating the priority when an operations arrives at a work center, update all job priorities at constant time intervals.

A comparative study between these two versions of handling a dynamic priority rule is presented utilizing three different due date assignment procedures used in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, N. and Surkis, J., ‘A Comparison of Capacity Planning Techniques in a Job Shop Control System’, Management Science, vol. 23, no. 5 (January 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, C. T. and Dzielinski, B. P., ‘Simulation of Simplified Job Shop’, Management Science, vol. 6, no. 3 (April 1960), pp. 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry, W. L. and Rao, V., ‘Critical Ratio Scheduling: An Experimental Analysis’, Management Science, vol. 22, no. 2 (October 1975), pp. 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bulkin, M. H., Colley, J. L., and Steinhoff, H. W., ‘Load Forecasting, Priority Sequencing, and Simulation in a Job-Shop Control System’, Management Science, vol. 13, no. 2 (October 1966), pp. 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll, D. C., ‘Heuristic Sequencing of Single and Multiple Component Jobs’, Ph.D. Dissertation Sloan School of Management, MIT (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conway, R. W., Johnson, B. M., and Maxwell, W. L., ‘An Experimental Investigation of Priority Dispatching’, Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. XI, no. 3 (May-June 1960 ), pp. 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conway, R. W., Maxwell, W. L., and Miller, L. W., Theory of Scheduling, Addison Wesley Publishing Co. (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eiion, S. and Hodgson, R. M., ‘Job Shop Scheduling with Due-Dates’, The International Journal of Production Research, vol. 6, no. 1 (1967), pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elvers, D. A., ‘A Simulation of Job Dispatching Rules Using Various Delivery Date Criteria’, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Sciences (1972), pp. 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gere, W. S., Jr., ‘Heuristics in Job Shop Scheduling’, Management Science, vol. 13, no. 3 (November 1966), pp. 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holstein, William K., ‘Production Planning and Control Integrated’, Harvard Business Review (May-June 1968), pp. 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LeGrande, Earl, ‘The Development of a Factory Simulation System Using Actual Operating Data’, Management Technology, vol. III, no. 1 (May 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nanot, Y. R. ‘An Experimental Investigation and Comparative Evaluation of Priority Disciplines in Job Shop Like Queueing Networks’, Ph.D. Dissertation UCLA (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reiter, S., ‘A System for Managing Job-Shop Production’, The Journal of Business of the University of Chicago, vol. XXXIX (July 1966), pp. 371–393.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rivera-Garza, M., ‘Labor and Machine Constrained Job Shops: A Simulation Investigation of Dispatching Rules’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rowe, A. J., ‘Application of Computer Simulation to Sequential Decision Rules in Production Scheduling’, Proceedings Eleventh Annual Industrial Engineering Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Los Angeles (February 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Surkis, J. and Adam, N., ‘Interaction of Priority Dispatching Rules and Due Date Assignment Procedures in Continuous Job Shops’, Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Decision Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weeks, J. K. and Fryer, J. S., ‘A Simulation Study of Operating Policies in a Hypothetical Dual-Constrained Job Shop’, Management Science, vol. 22, no. 12 (August 1976), pp. 1362–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Surkis, J., Adam, N.R. (1979). Priority updating procedures in dynamic job shop simulation studies: the impact on measures of performance under different due date assignment rules. In: Ritzman, L.P., Krajewski, L.J., Berry, W.L., Goodman, S.H., Hardy, S.T., Vitt, L.D. (eds) Disaggregation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7636-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7636-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-7638-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7636-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics