Abstract
The development of the Statement Reality Analysis (SRA) technique is described. The technique is employed to assess the credibility of witness evidence in criminal cases. An expert psychologist is appointed by the court in cases in which a child’s evidence is central in criminal proceedings. The expert interviews the child, other principals in the event, reviews the forensic evidence, attends the trial and then renders an opinion to the court of the credibility of the child’s evidence. Procedures like SRA are employed in both parts of Germany and in Sweden.
The chapter begins with a critical examination of eyewitness research and its limited value in real forensic contexts. The origins of SRA are then traced from a court decision in Germany in the 1950s to its full elaboration in the 1970s. The assumptions underlying the SRA procedure are detailed and the procedure outlined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a science of personality. New York: Commonwealth Fund.
Arntzen, F. (1970). Psychologie der Zeugenaussage. [Psychology of witness testimony]. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologic (2nd ed. 1983). München: Beck.
Arntzen, F. (1977). Aussagepsychologie. [Psychology of testimony]. In G. Eisen (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Rechtsmedizin (Vol. 3V Stuttgart: Enke.
Binet, A. (1900). La suggestibilité. Paris: Schleicher.
Braque, G. (1917). Pensées sur l’art.
Clifford, B. R., & Bull, R. (1978). The psychology of person identification. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
De Francis, V. (1971). Protecting the child victim of sex crimes committed by adults. Federal Probation, 35, 15–20.
Devlin, Lord Patrick (Chair). (1976). Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Office of the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Eckermann, J. P. (1836/1982). Gespräche mit Goethe. [Conversations with Goethe], ed. by R. Otto. (1982). Berlin: Aufbau. (Original work published 1836).
Felony Arrests: Their prosecution and disposition in New York City’s courts. (1977). New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
Gebhard, P. H., Gagnon, J. H., Pomeroy, W. B., & Christenson, C V. (1965). Sex offenders. New York: Harper & Row.
Hall, G. S. (1904). Adolescence (Vol. 1). New York: Appleton.
Herbold, H. (1977). The psychology of evidence. Polygraph, 6, 241–252.
Kantor, J. R. (1924, 1926). Principles of psychology (2 vols.). New York: A. Knopf.
Koffka, K. (1925). Psychologie. [Psychology]. In M. Dessoir (Ed.), Philosophie in Einzeldarstellungen. Berlin.
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lievens, S. (1974). De psychologie van het getuigenis als rechtspsychologische vraag sstelling. [The psychology of testimony as a problem of legal psychology]. Wetenschappelijke Tijdingen, 297-314.
Lipton, J. P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 62, 90–93.
Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Marshall, J., Marquis, K. H., & Oskamp, S. (1971). Effects of kind of question and atmosphere on accuracy and completeness of testimony. Harvard Law Review, 84, 1620–1643.
Michaelis-Arntzen, E. (1981). Die Vergewaltigung. [Forcible rape]. München: C.H. Beck.
Mohr, J. W. (1962). The pedophilias. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 7, 255–260.
Müller-Luckmann, E. (1967). Aussagepsychologie. [Psychology of testimony]. In A. Ponsold (Ed.), Lehrbuch der gerichtlichen Medizin (3rd ed.). Stuttgart: Thieme.
Murphy, G. (1947). Personality. New York: Harper.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peters, K. (1972). Fehlerquellen in Strafprozessen. [Sources of errors in criminal proceedings] (Vol. 2). Karlsruhe: C.F. Müller.
Philippides, T. G. (1979). Dikastike psychologia. [Forensic psychology]. Thessalonike: Ekdotikos oikos adelphon kyriakide. (2nd ed. 1986).
Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual exploitation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Shepherd, J., Ellis, H. D., & Davies, G. M. (1982). Identification evidence. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Stern, W. (1902). Zur Psychologie der Aussage. [To the psychology of testimony]. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 22.
Stern, W. (1904). Die Aussage als geistige Leistung und als Verhörsprodukt. [The testimony as intellectual achievement and product of interviewing]. Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage, 1, 269–415.
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of personality. New York: Norton.
Szewczyk, H. (1973). Kriterien der Beurteilung kindlicher Zeugenaussagen. [Criteria for validity assessment of children’s testimonial statements]. Probleme und Ergebnisse der Psychologie, 46, 46–66.
Tolman, E. C. (1951). A psychological model. In T. Parsons & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trankell, A. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm: Rotobeckmann (English translation of Vittnespsykologins arbetsmetoder. 1963. Stockholm: Bokförlaget Liber).
Tully, B. (1985). Special care questioning. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 9-15.
Uemura, H. (1962). Neuere Fortschritte in der Gerichtspsychologie: Die Aussagepsychologie von Prof. Udo Undeutsch. [Recent developments in Forensic Psychology: The statement validity assessment by Prof. Udo Undeutsch]. Acta Criminologiae et Médicinale Legalis Japonica, 135-140.
Undeutsch, U. (1954). Die Entwicklung der gerichtspsychologischen Gutachtertätigkeit. [The historical development of the use of expert psychological testimony]. In A. Wellek (Ed.), Bericht über den 19. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (pp. 132–154). Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie. (Enlarged version published simultaneously as book).
Undeutsch, U. (1957). Aussagepsychologie. [Psychology of testimony]. In A. Ponsold (Ed.), Lehrbuch der gerichtlichen Medizin (2nd ed.) (pp. 191–219). Stuttgart: Thieme.
Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Zeugenaussagen. [Assessing validity of testimonial statements]. In U. Undeutsch (Ed.), Handbuch der Psychologie. Vol. II: Forensische Psychologie (pp. 26–181). Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie. [Japanese translation by H. Uemura (1973), Shogen no shinri. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.]
Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement Reality Analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past (pp. 27–56). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.
Undeutsch, U. (1983). Vernehmung und non-verbale Information. [Assessing validity of testimonial statements by interviewing and polygraphic techniques]. In E. Kube, H. U. Störzer, & S. Brugger (Eds.), Wissenschaftliche Kriminalistik (Vol. 1, pp. 389–418). Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.
Undeutsch, U. (1984). Courtroom evaluation of eyewitness testimony. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 51–67.
Wigmore, J. H. (1970). Evidence (Vol. 7). (Revised by J. H. Chadbourn). Boston: Little, Brown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Undeutsch, U. (1989). The Development of Statement Reality Analysis. In: Yuille, J.C. (eds) Credibility Assessment. Nato Science, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7856-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7856-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4043-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-7856-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive