Abstract
In the Italian legal system, two reconciliatory models have recently been introduced to the field of juvenile justice. These are based on diversion from trial and are “Discharge for petty offenses” and “Suspension of trial and probation.” In the latter, the judge may encourage reconciliation between the offender and the victim. This mediation is arranged by the judge, in collaboration with the social services, because prosecution is mandatory. The reform of juvenile justice in the context of the reform of the Italian code of criminal procedure has been inspired by three concepts: rehabilitation, victimology, and abolitionism. The results and efficacy of mediation must be carefully verified over the next years.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albrecht, H. I, & Schädler, W. (1986). Community service. Freiburg: Max-Plank-Institut-Verlag.
Anttila, J. (1982). Discussion on the “rehabilitation” model in Scandinavia. Revue internationale de droit pénale, 53, 819–820.
Anttila, J. (1983). Neue Tendenzen der Kriminalpolitik in Skandinavien. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 95, 739–748.
Baratta, A. (1985). Principi del diritto penale minimo. Dei delitti e delle pene, 3, 443–473.
Baurmann, M. (1987). Zweckrationalität und Strafrecht. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Bianchi, H. (1966). Ethik des Straf ens. Berlin-Neuwied: Luchterhand.
Christie, N. (1977). Conflict as property. British Journal of Criminology, 17, 1–15.
Christie, N. (1981). Limits to pain. Oxford: Robertson.
Christie, N. (1988). Überlegungen zum Konzept Verbrechen. Kriminologisches Journal, 20, 50–61.
Cloward, R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs, London: Routledge, Kegan-Paul.
Cordero, F. (1959). Il giudizio d’onore. Milano: Giuffré.
Dolcini, E. (1977). Lavoro libero e controllo sociale. Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 20, 479–541.
Dolcini, E., & Paliero, C. E. (1989). Il carcere ha alternative? Milano: Giuffré.
Eusebi, L. (1989). La pena “in crisi”. Brescia: Morcelliana.
Ferrajoli, L. (1990). Il diritto penale minimo. Dei delitti e delle pene, 8, 493–524.
Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.
Frehsee, D. (1988). Schadenswiedergutmachung als Instrument strafrechtlicher Sozialkontrolle. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
Gulotta, G., & Capurro, P. (1990). Come conciliare il reo con la vittima. In Cataldo L. Neoburger (Ed.), Nel segno del minore (139–148). Padova: Cedam.
Gulotta, G., & Santi, G. (1988). Dal conflitto al consenso. Milano: Giuffré.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Haffke, B. (1976). Tiefenpsychologie und Generalprävention. Eine strafrechtstheoretische Untersuchung. Frankfurt: Sauerländer.
Hassemer, W. (1974). Strafrechtsdogmatik und Kriminalpolitik. Hamburg: Rowolt.
Hassemer, W. (1983). Strafziele im sozialwissenschaftlich orientierten Strafrecht. In Fortschritte im Strafrecht durch die Sozialwissenschaften? (pp. 39–66). Heidelberg: Müller.
Hassemer, W. (1990). Kennzeichen und Krisen des modernen Strafrechts. Manuscript not submitted for publication.
Hirsch, A. von (1987). The sentencing commission and its guidelines. Northeastern University Press.
Hirsch, A. von (1976). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. New York: Hill and Wang.
Hulsman, L. (1975). Dèfense sociale nouvelle et critères de décriminalisation. Etudes Marc Ancel, 2, 190. Paris: Pedone.
Hulsman, L. (1982). Peines perdues. Paris: Le Centurion.
ISTAT (1988). Annuario delie Statistiche Givoliziorie. Roma: Poliogrefico.
Jakobs, G. (1976). Schuld und Prävention. Tübingen: Mohr.
Jakobs, G. (1983). Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Koch, H. (1988). Jenseits der Strafe. Tübingen: Mohr.
Kerner, H.-J. (1983). Diversion statt Strafe? Heidelberg: Kriminalistik Verlag.
Luhmann, N. (1972). Rechtssoziologie. Hamburg: Rowolt.
Mair, G. (1988). Probation day centres. London: Home Office.
Marconi, P. (1981). Decriminalizzazione e crisi dello Stato del benessere. La questione criminale, 7, 391–422.
Mathiesen, T. (1971). The politics of abolition. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Mathiesen, T. (1981). Law society and political action. New York: Academic Press.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Naegeli, E. (1969). Die Gesellschaft und die Kriminellen. In E. Bittner (Ed.), Verbrechen — Schuld oder Schicksal (pp. 40–72), Stuttgart: Klett.
Nelken, D. (1985). Community involvement in crime control. Current Legal Problems, 38, 239–267.
Nimmer, R. (1974). Diversion. Chicago: A.B.F.
Paliero, C. E. (1985). Minima non curat praetor. Padova: Cedam.
Paliero, C. E. (1986). Il lavoro libero nella prassi sanzionatoria italiana. Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 29, 88–117.
Paliero, C. E. (1989). Depenalizzazione. Digesto delle discipline penalistiche, 3, 425.
Paliero, C. E. (1990). Il principio di effettività del diritto penale. Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 33, 430–544.
Palomba, F. (1989). Il sistema del nuovo processo penale minorile. Milano: Giuffré.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.
Plack, A. (1974). Plädoyer für die Abschaffung des Strafrechts. München: List.
Radbruch, G. (1983). Rechtsphilosophie. Stuttgart: Köhler.
Roxin, K. (1979). Zur jüngsten Diskussion über Schuld, Prävention und Verantwortlichkeit im Strafrecht. In Festschrift Bockelmann (pp. 279-309), München: Beck.
Roxin, K. (1979). Risarcimento del danno e fini della pena. Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale, 22, 3–23.
Savona, U. (1980). Criminalità o devianza? Sociologia del diritto, 107.
Sessar, K. (1983). Schadenswiedergutmachung in einer künftigen Kriminalpolitik. Festschrift Leferenz (pp. 145–161). Heidelberg: Müller.
Schumann, K. (1989). Positive Generalprävention. Heidelberg: Müller.
Smaus, G. (1990). Modelli di società nel movimento abolizionista. Dei delitti e delle pene, 569-588.
Streng, F. (1980). Schuld, Vergeltung, Generalprävention. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 92, 637–681.
Sutherland, E. H. (1983). White collar crime: The uncut version. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.
Tomasic, R., & Feeley, M. (1982). Neighborhood justice. New York: Longman.
Walter, M. (1983). Wandlungen in der Reaktion auf Kriminalität. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 95, 32–65.
Weigend, T. (1989). Deliktsopfer und Strafverfahren. Berlin: Ducker und Humblot.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paliero, C.E., Mannozzi, G. (1992). Mediation and Reconciliation Models in Italian Legal Experience. In: Messmer, H., Otto, HU. (eds) Restorative Justice on Trial. Nato Science Series D: (closed), vol 64. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8064-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8064-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4128-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8064-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive