Abstract
To Boole and his mid-nineteenth century contemporaries, the title of this article would have been very puzzling. For Boole’s first work in logic, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic, appeared in 1847 and, although the beginnings of modern abstract algebra can be traced back to the early part of the nineteenth century, the subject had not fully emerged until towards the end of the century. Only then could one clearly distinguish and compare algebras. (We use the term algebra here as standing for a formal system, not a structure which realizes, or is a model for, it—for instance, the algebra of integral domains as codified by a set of axioms versus a particular structure, e.g., the integers, which satisfies these axioms.) Granted, however, that this later full degree of understanding has been attained, and that one can conceptually distinguish algebras, is it not true that Boole’s “algebra of logic” is Boolean algebra?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Readings
C. Boole. An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, on which are founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities, Walton and Maberley, 1854. Reprinted by Open Court Publ. Co.. 1916.1940, and by Dover, New York. 1951.
T. Hailperin, Boole’s Logic and Probability, North-Holland, New York, 1976.
P.L. Hammer (Ivanescu) and S. Rudeanu, Boolean Methods in Operations Research and Related Areas. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1968.
W.S. Jevons, Pure Logic and Other Minor Works. Macmillan, New York. 1890.
M Kline. Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modem Times, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1972. Chapter 32.
W. Kneale and M. Kneale, The Development of Logic, Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1962.
E. Koppelman, The calculus of operations and the rise of abstract algebra. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci., 8 (1971) 155–242.
N.H. McCoy, Rings and Ideals, Cams Mathematical Monograph No. 18. The Mathematical Association of America, Washington. D.C., 1948.
G. Peacock, A treatise on algebra, 1842; reprinted. Scripta Math., Yeshiva College, 1940.
R. Sikorski, Boolean Algebras, 3rd ed., Springer, New York, 1969.
N.L Styazhkin, History of Mathematical Logic from Leibniz to Peano. The M.I.T. Press, 1969 (Originally published as Stanovleniye idey malhematischeskoy logiki, Nauka, 1964).
A.I. Uzkov, On rings of quotients of commutative rings (Russian). Malhemalicheskit sbornik (N.S.), 22(64) (1948) 439–441. (Translated as American Mathematical Society Transl, no. 3, 1–5, American Mathematical Society, 1949.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hailperin, T. (2000). Boole’s Algebra Isn’t Boolean Algebra. In: Gasser, J. (eds) A Boole Anthology. Synthese Library, vol 291. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9385-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9385-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5491-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9385-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive