Abstract
The title of my paper indicates that I plan to write about foundations for analysis and about proof theory; however, I do not intend to write about the foundations for analysis and thus not about analysis viewed from the vantage point of any “school” in the philosophy of mathematics. Rather, I shall report on some mathematical and proof-theoretic investigations which provide material for (philosophical) reflection. These investigations concern the informal mathematical theory of the continuum, on the one hand, and formal systems in which parts of the informal theory can be developed, on the other. The proof-theoretic results of greatest interest for my purposes are of the following form:
for each F in a class of sentences, F is provable in T if and only if F is provable in T*
where T is a classical set-theoretic system for analysis and T* a constructive theory. In that case, T is called REDUCIBLE TO T*, as the principles of T* are more elementary and more restricted.
Douter de tout ou tout croire, ce sont deux solutions également commodes qui l’une et l’autre nous dispensent de réfléchir.
H. Poincaré
This paper was completed in June 1981; some minor changes were made in August 1982.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bernays, P.: 1922A, `Ober Hilberts Gedanken zur Grundlegung der Arithmetik’, Jahresbericht DMV 31 10–19.
Bernays, P.: 1922B, `Die Bedeutung Hilberts für die Philosophie der Mathematik’, Die Naturwissenschaften, Heft 4, 93–99.
Bernays, P.: 1930, `Die Philosophie der Mathematik und die Hilbertsche Beweistheorie’, in Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik; see Bernays, 1976, pp. 17–61.
Bernays, P.: 1935, `Hilberts Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Arithmetik’, in Gesammelte Abhandlungen; see Hilbert, 1935, pp. 196–216.
Bernays, P.: 1950, `Mathematische Existenz und Widerspruchsfreiheit’, in Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik; See Bernays, 1976, pp. 92–106.
Bernays, P.: 1967, `David Hilbert’, in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy III, New York, pp. 496–504.
Bernays, P.: 1976, Abhandlungen zur Philosophie der Mathematik,Darmstadt.
Bernays, P.: 1978, `Bemerkungen zu Lorenzens Stellungnahme in der Philosophie der Mathematik’, in K. Lorenz (ed.), Konstruktionen versus Positionen, Berlin, pp. 3–16.
Borel, E.: 1914, Lecons sur la théorie des fonctions, Deuxième édition, Paris.
Brouwer, L. E. J.: 1927, `über Definitionsbereiche von Funktionen’, in J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 446–463.
Buchholz, W., S. Feferman, W. Pohlers, W. Sieg: 1981, `Iterated Inductive Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis: Recent Proof-Theoretical Studies’, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 897, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Dedekind, R.: 1932, Gesammelte Mathematische Werke (Bd. III), Braunschweig. Feferman, S.: 1964, `Systems of Predicative Analysis’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 1–30. Reprinted in J. Hintikka (ed.): 1969, The Philosophy of Mathematics,Oxford, pp. 95–127.
Feferman, S.: 1970, `Formal Theories for Transfinite Iterations of Generalized Inductive Definitions and Some Subsystems of Analysis’, in Kino, Myhill, and Vesley (eds.), Intuitionism and Proof Theory, Amsterdam, London, pp. 303–325.
Feferman, S.: 1977, `Theories of Finite Type Related to Mathematical Practice’, in J. Barwise (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Amsterdam, pp. 913–971.
Feferman, S: 1978, `A More Perspicuous Formal System for Predicativity’, in K. Lorenz (ed.), Konstruktionen Versus Positionen, Berlin, pp. 68–93.
Feferman, S. and W. Sieg: 1981, `Iterated Inductive Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis’, in W. Buchholz, S. Feferman, W. Pohlers, and W. Sieg, `Iterated Inductive
Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis: Recent Proof-Theoretical Studies’, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 897 Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 16–77.
Friedman, H.: 1970, `Iterated Inductive Definitions and a-AC’, Kino, Myhill, and Vesley (eds.), Intuitionism and Proof Theory, Amsterdam, London, pp. 435–442.
Friedman, H.: 1976, `The Arithmetic Theory of Sets and Functions I’, (mimeographed).
Gandy, R. O.: 1973, `Bertrand Russell, as Mathematician’, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 5 pp. 342–348.
Gauss, K. F. and F. W. Bessel: 1880, Briefwechsel,Leipzig.
Gentzen, G.: 1934/5, ‘Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen I, II’, Math. Zeitschrift 39176–210, 405–431.
Gödel, K.: 1931, `über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und Verwandter Systeme I’, in M. David (ed.), The Undecidable, Hewlett, New York, pp. 5–38.
Gödel, K.: 1944, `Russell’s Mathematical Logic’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, Evanston, pp. 125–153.
Hilbert, D.: 1900, `Über den Zahlbegriff’, Jahresbericht DMV 8 pp. 180–194.
Hilbert, D.: 1902, `Sur les problèmes futurs des mathématiques’, in Compte Rendu du Deuxième Congrès International des Mathématiciens, Paris, pp. 58–114.
Hilbert, D.: 1904, `über die Grundlagen der Logik und Arithmetik’, in Grundlagen der Geometrie, 5. Auflage, Leipzig and Berlin, pp. 243–258.
Hilbert, D.: 1922, Grundlagen der Geometrie, 5. Auflage, Leipzig and Berlin.
Hilbert, D.: 1928, ‘Probleme der Grundlegung der Mathematik’, in K. Reidemeister (ed), Hilbert, Berlin, pp. 9–19.
Hilbert, D.: 1931, `Die Grundlegung der Elementaren Zahlenlehre’, Math. Annalen 104, 485–494.
Hilbert, D.: 1935, Gesammelte Abhandlungen, 3. Band, Berlin.
Hilbert, D. and P. Bernays: 1934 (1968): Grundlagen der Mathematik 1, Zweite Auflage, Berlin.
Kreisel, G.: 1968, `Survey of Proof Theory’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 33, 321–388. Kronecker, L.: 1887, `über den Zahlbegriff’, in Werke III, pp. 251–274.
Kronecker, L.: 1901, Vorlesungen zur Zahlentheorie, (K. Hensel, editor ), Leipzig.
Moore, G. H.: 1980, `Beyond First-Order Logic: The Historical Interplay Between Mathematical Logic and Axiomatic Set Theory’, History and Philosophy of Logic 1, 95–137.
Poincaré, H.: 1902, `Du rôle de l’Intuition et de la Logique en Mathématiques’ in Compte Rendu du Deuxième Congrès International des Mathématiciens, Paris, 115–130.
Reid, C.: 1970, Hilbert,Berlin.
Russell, B.: 1908, `Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types’, in J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 18791931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 150–182.
Sieg, W.: 1977, Trees in Metamathematics (Theories of Inductive Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis), Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford.
Tait, W. W.: 1965, `Functionals Defined by Transfinite Recursion’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 30, 155–174.
Takeuti, G.: 1978, Two Applications of Logic to Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
van Heijenoort, J.: 1967, From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic 1879–1931, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Weber, H.: 1893, `Leopold Kronecker’, Jahresbericht DMV2, 5–31.
Weyl, H.: 1918, Das Kontinuum,Leipzig.
Whitehead, A. N. and B. Russell: 1910, Principia Mathematica I,Cambridge.
Zermelo, E.: 1908, ‘Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre I’, Math. Ann. 65, 261–281.
Zermelo, E.: 1931, `Über Stufen der Quantifikation und die Logik des Unendlichen’, Jahresbericht DMV 31, 85–88.
Zermelo, E.: 1935, `Grundlagen einer Allgemeinen Theorie der Mathematischen Satzsysteme’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 25, 136–146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sieg, W. (1984). Foundations for Analysis and Proof Theory. In: Leblanc, H., Mendelson, E., Orenstein, A. (eds) Foundations: Logic, Language, and Mathematics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1592-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1592-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8406-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1592-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive