Abstract
The aim of this essay is to show the relationship between Merleau-Ponty and Lacan. Our concern is to examine how the relationship changed from Merleau-Ponty’s early thought to his later philosophy. In addition to this, in order to explore the complicated relations, we must take into consideration that Freud’s theory and Heidegger’s thought were combined in the later philosophy of Merleau-Ponty. It is true that their influence on Merleau-Ponty has been considered separately by many scholars, but as it is for Merleau-Ponty Freudian thought had to be interpreted ontologically and so Merleau-Ponty’s ontological psychoanalysis was created. Our second aim is to then compare Lacan’s ideas and Merleau-Ponty’s ontological psychoanalysis. In relation to this comparison, the issue of negativity will be taken up, because in negativity both thinkers came close to agreeing, even though with respect to the same we can find a marked difference between the two.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “L’Enfant vu par l’adulte,” Merleau-Ponty à la Sorbonne: Résumé de cours 1949–1952 (Grenoble: Éditions Cynara, 1988 ), p. 108.
Ibid., p. 113.
David Michael Levin, “Vision of Narcissism: Intersubjectivity and the Reversals of Reflection,” in Merleau-Ponty Vivant, ed. M. C. Dillon ( Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991 ), p. 62.
Jacques Lacan, “Merleau-Ponty in Memoriam,” in Merleau-Ponty and Psychology, ed. Keith Hoeller (New Jersey: Humanities Press, 1993 ), p. 78.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
James M. Edie, Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy of Language: Structuralism and Dialectics (Washington, D.C.: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America, 1987), p. 18. Though Edie thinks that there is not much clear thought in The Visible and the Invisible, I do not regard it as contradictory or “a footnote” to his second period.
James Schmidt, Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Between Phenomenology and Structuralism ( Boston: Boston University; Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1985 ), p. 108.
Ferdinand de Saussure, Cours de linguistique générale, published by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye with the collaboration of Albert Riedlinger (Lausanne and Paris: Payot, 1916 ), pp. 31–32.
Michael Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension ( Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith, 1966 ), p. 34.
Lacan, “Merleau-Ponty in Memoriam,” op. cit.,p. 78.
Marc Richir, “Un tout nouveau rapport à la psychanalyse,” Les Cahiers de Philosophie 7 (1989), p. 165.
M. C. Dillon, Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology ( Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1988 ), p. 194.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 196.
Jacques Taminiaux, Le Regard et l’excédent, Phaenomenologica 75 ( The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1977 ), p. 108.
Dillon, Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology, op. cit., p. 206.
M. C. Dillon, “The Unconscious: Language and World,” in Merleau-Ponty in Contemporary Perspectives, Phaenomenologica 129, ed. Patrick Burke and Jan Van Der Veken (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993 ), p. 80.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis: Preface to Hesnard’s L’Oeuvre de Freud,” in Merleau-Ponty and Psychology, ed. Keith Holler ( Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1993 ), p. 68.
Ibid., p. 71.
Renaud Barbaras De l’être du phénomène: Sur l’ontologie de Merleau-Ponty (Grenoble: Editions Jérôme Millon, 1991), p. 315.
David Michael Levin, “Vision of Narcissism,” op. cit.,p. 68.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “Themes from the Lectures at the Collège de France 1952–1960,” in In Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. John O’Neill (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970 ), p. 159.
Martin Heidegger, Nietzsche, zweiter Band (Pfullingen: Neske, 1961 ), pp. 358–359.
Sigmund Freud, “The Unconscious,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV ( London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis, 1957 ), p. 201.
J. Laplanche and J.-B. Pontalis, The Language of Psycho-analysis, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith (London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis, 1973 ), pp. 62–65.
Merleau-Ponty, “Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis,” op. cit.,p. 67.
Ibid.,p. 71.
Sigmund Freud, “The Outline of Psycho-analysis,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXIII ( London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis, 1957 ), pp. 148–151.
Laplanche and Pontalis, Language, op. cit.,p. 292.
Merleau-Ponty, “Phenomenology and Psychoanalysis,” op. cit.,p. 69.
Ibid., p. 68.
Freud, “Outline,” op. cit.,p. 69.
Groupe de Recherches sur la philosophie et le language, Merleau-Ponty: La philosophie et son langage, Recherche sur la philosophie et le langage 15 (Grenoble: Université Pierre Mendes, 1993 ), p. 17.
Lacan, “Memoriam,” op. cit.,p. 79.
Jacques Lacan, Écrits: A Selection, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: W.W. Norton and Company; London: Tavistock, 1977 ), p. 150.
Bice Benvenuto and Roger Kennedy, The Works of Jacques Lacan ( New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1986 ), p. 129.
Lacan, Écrits, op. cit.,p. 199.
Ibid., p. 217.
Ibid., p. 287.
Ibid., p. 288.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, La Nature: Notes: Cours du Collège de France,compiled and annotated by Dominique Séglard (Paris: Édition de Seuil, 1995), p. 290.
Benvenuto and Kennedy, Works, p. 110.
Ibid., p. 114.
Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-analysis, ed. Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. Alan Sherdidan ( New York, London: W. W. Norton and Company, 1978 ), p. 81.
Ibid., pp. 81–82.
Ibid., p. 90.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, “The Child’s Relations with Others,” trans. William Cobb, in The Primacy of Perception, ed. James M. Edie ( Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964 ), pp. 125–141.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Musubu, O. (1998). Psychoanalysis and Ontology: Lacan, Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty. In: Tymieniecka, AT., Matsuba, S. (eds) Immersing in the Concrete. Analecta Husserliana, vol 58. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1830-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1830-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5035-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1830-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive