Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics: A review

  • Chapter
New Vistas in Agroforestry

Part of the book series: Advances in Agroforestry ((ADAG,volume 1))

Abstract

The period since the early 1990s has witnessed an explosion of research on the adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics. Much of this work was motivated by a perceived gap between advances in agroforestry science and the success of agroforestry-based development programs and projects. Achieving the full promise of agroforestry requires a fundamental understanding of how and why farmers make long-term land-use decisions and applying this knowledge to the design, development, and ‘marketing’ of agroforestry innovations. This paper reviews the theoretical and empirical literature that has developed during the past decade analyzing agroforestry adoption from a variety of perspectives and identifies needed future research. Much progress has been made, especially in using binary choice regression models to assess influences of farm and household characteristics on adoption and in developing ex-ante participatory, on-farm research methods for analyzing the potential adoptability of agroforestry innovations. Additional research-needs that have been identified include developing a better understanding of the role of risk and uncertainty, insights into how and why farmers adapt and modify adopted systems, factors influencing the intensity of adoption, village-level and spatial analyses of adoption, the impacts of disease such as AIDS and malaria on adoption, and the temporal path of adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abadi Ghadim A.K. and Pannell D.J. 1999. A conceptual frame-work of adoption of an agricultural innovation. Agr Econ 21: 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abadi Ghadim A.K. and Pannell D.J. 2003. Risk attitudes and risk perceptions of crop producers in Western Australia. pp. 114– 133. In: Babcock B.A., Fraser R.W. and Lekakis J.N. (eds) Risk Management and the Environment: Agriculture in Perspective. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adesina A.A. and Chianu J. 2002. Determinants of farmers’ ad-option and adaptation of alley farming technology in Nigeria. Agroforest Syst 55: 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adesina A.A., Mbila D., Nkamleu G.B. and Endamana D. 2000. Econometric analysis of the determinants of adoption of alley farming by farmers in the forest zone of southwest Cameroon. Agric Ecosyst Environ 80: 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavalapati J., Luckert M. and Gill D. 1995. Adoption of agro-forestry practices: a case study from Andhra Pradesh, India. Agroforest Syst 32: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen J. 1990. ‘Homestead tree planting in two rural Swazi com-munities.’ Agroforest Syst 11: 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amacher G.S., Ersado L., Hyde W.F. and Haynes A. Tree plant-ing in Tigray, Ethiopia: the importance of disease and water microdams. Agroforest Syst (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amacher G., Hyde W. and Rafiq M. 1993. Local adoption of new forestry technologies: an example from Pakistan’s NW Frontier Province. World Dev 21: 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J.E.M. and Dewees P.A. 1995. Tree Management in Farmer Strategies: Responses to Agricultural Intensification. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 292 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York. 124 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K.J. 1969. Classification notes on the production and trans-mission of technological knowledge. Am Econ Rev 59: 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K.J. and Fisher A.C. 1974. Environmental preservation, uncertainty and irreversibility. Q J Econ 88: 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayuk E. 1997. Adoption of agroforestry technology: the case of live hedges in the Central Plateau of Burkina Faso. Agr Syst 54: 189– 206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister M.E. and Nair P.K.R. 2003. Agroforestry adoption in Haiti: the importance of household and farm characteristics. Agroforest Syst 57: 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett C.B., Place F., Aboudk A. and Brown D.R. 2002. The challenge of stimulating adoption of improved natural resource management practices in African agriculture. pp. 1–22. In: Bar-rett C.B., Place F. and Aboud A. (eds) Natural Resources Man-agement in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Besley T. 1995. Property rights and investment incentives: theory and evidence from Ghana. J Polit Econ 103: 902–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigman D. 1996. Safety-first criteria and their measures of risk. Am J Agr Econ 78: 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger H. and Ruttan V. 1978. Induced innovation: technology, institutions, and development. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 423 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boahene K., Snijders T.A.B. and Folmer H. 1999. An integrated so-cioeconomic analysis of innovation adoption: the case of hybrid cocoa in Ghana. J Policy Model 21: 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boserup E. 1965. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth. Aldine: Chicago. 124 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckles D. and B. Triomphe. 1999. Adoption of mucuna in the farming systems of northern Hounduras. Agroforest Syst 47: 67–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D. and Collinson M.P. 1980. Planning technologies appro-priate to farmers. CIMMYT, Mexico. 71 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caveness, F.A. and Kurtz W.B. 1993. Agroforestry adoption and risk perception by farmers in Senegal. Agroforest Syst 21: 11– 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caviglia J. and Kahn J. (2001). Diffusion of sustainable agriculture in the Brazilian tropical rain forest: a discrete choice analysis. Econ Dev Cult Change 49: 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay D., Reardon T. and Kangasniemi J. 1998. Sustainable intens-ification in the highland tropics: Rwandan farmers’ investments in land conservation and soil fertility. Econ Dev Cult Change 46: 351–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R., Pacey A. and Thrupp L.A. 1989. Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. Intermediate Technology Publications, London. 218 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Current D., Lutz E. and Scherr S. 1995. Costs, benefits and farmer adoption of agroforestry. Chapter 1. pp. 1–27. In: Current D., Lutz E. and Scherr S. (eds) Costs, Benefits and Farmer Adop-tion of Agroforestry: Project Experience in Central America and the Caribbean. World Bank Environment Paper Number 14. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daru R.D. and Tips W.E.J. 1985. Farmers participation and socio-economic effects of a watershed management programme in Central Java (Solo river basin, Wiroko watershed). Agroforest Syst 3: 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doss C.R. and Morris M.L. 2001. How does gender affect the ad-option of agricultural innovations? The case of improved maize technology in Ghana. Agr Econ 25: 27–39. 327

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans P.T. 1988. Designing agroforestry innovations to increase their adoptability: a case study from Paraguay. J Rural Stud 4: 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder G., Just R.E. and Zilberman D. 1985. Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A survey. Econ Dev Cult Change 33: 255–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder G. and Umali D.L. 1993. The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review. Technol Forecast Soc 43: 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster A.D. and Rosenzweig M.R. 1995. Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. J Politi Econ 103: 1176–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S. 1999. Socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption potential of improved tree fallows in Africa. Agroforest Syst 47: 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S. and Scherr S.J. 2002. Introduction. p. 1–11. In: Franzel S. and Scherr S.J. (eds) Trees on the Farm: Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agroforestry Practices in Africa. CABI, Wallingford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S., Scherr S.J., Coe R, Cooper P.J.M. and Place F. 2002. Methods for assessing agroforestry adoption potential. pp. 37– 64. In: Franzel S. and Scherr S.J. (eds) Trees on the Farm: Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agrforestry Practices in Africa. CABI, Wallingford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Foster A.D. and Rosenzweig M.R. 1995. Learning by doing and learning from others: human capital and technical change in agriculture. J Politi Econ 103: 1176–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaka S. 1989. The need to build upon farmer practice and knowledge: reminders from selected upland conservation projects and policies. Agroforest Syst 9: 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin C.H. 1976. A view of the Plan Puebla: an application of hierarchical decision models. Am J Agr Econ 58: 881–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin C.H., Peterson J.S. and Mwale A.C. 2002a. The quality of science in participatory research: a case study from Eastern Zambia. World Dev 30: 523–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin C.H., Peterson J.S., Phiri D. and Uttaro R. 2002b. Agroforestry adoption decisions, structural adjustment and gender in Africa. pp. 115–128. In: Barrett C.B., Place F. and Aboud A. (eds) Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning A., Mahapatra A. and Mitchell C.P. 2001. Modes of communication and effectiveness of agroforestry extension in Eastern India. Hum Ecol 29: 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy R.A. 1992. Determinants of smallholder commercial tree cultivation. World Dev 20: 713–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A.C. 1993. Agricultural innovation in three areas of Kenya: Neo-Boserupian theories and regional characterization. Econ Geogr 69: 44–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene W.H. 1997. Econometric Analysis: Third Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 1075 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z. 1957. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25: 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks J.R. 1932. The Theory of Wages. Macmillan, London. 247 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries S.A. 1993. The intensification of traditional agricul-ture among Yucatec Mayan farmers: facing up the dilemma of livelihood sustainability. Human Ecol 21: 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde W.F. and Amacher G.S. 2000. Economics of Forestry and Rural Development: An empirical introduction from Asia. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 287 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde W.F., Kohlin G. and Amacher G.S. 2000. Social Forestry Reconsidered. pp. 243–287. In: Hyde W.F. and Amacher G.S. Economics of Forestry and Rural Development: An empirical introduction from Asia. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just R.E. and Zilberman D. 1983. Stochastic structure, farm size, and technology adoption in developing agriculture. Oxford Econ Pap 35: 307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjanson P., Okike I., Tarawali S.A., Kruska R., Manyong V.M. and Singh B.B. 2002. Evaluating adoption of new crop-livestocksoil-management technologies using georeferenced village-level data: the case of cowpea in the dry savannahs of West Africa. pp. 169–180. In: Barrett C.B., Place F. and Aboud A. (eds) Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lapar M.L. and Pandey S. 1999. Adoption of soil conservation: the case of the Philippines uplands. Agr Econ 21: 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra M., Pannell D.J. and Ghadim A.A. 2003. The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve? Agr Syst 75: 215–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer E., Haggar J., Snook A and Sosa M. Agroforestry adoption in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Campeche, Mexico. J Crop Production (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer D.E. and Miller R.P. 1998. Socioeconomic research in agroforestry: progress, prospects, priorities. Agroforest Syst 38: 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer D.E. and Pattanayak S. 2003. Agroforestry adoption by small holders. pp. 283–300. In: Sills E. and Abt K. (eds) Forests in a Market Economy. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair P.K.R. 1996. Agroforestry directions and trends. pp. 74–95. In: McDonald P. and Lassoie J. (eds) The Literature of Forestry and Agroforestry. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris P.E. and Kramer R.A. 1990. The elicitation of subjective probabilities with applications in agricultural economics. Rev Market Agri Econ 58: 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka K., Suyanto S., Sonobe T. and Tomich T. 2001. Evolution of land tenure institutions and development of agroforestry: evidence from customary land areas of Sumatra. Agr Econ 25: 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owubah C.E., Le Master D.C., Bowker J.M. and Lee J.G. 2001. Forest tenure systems and sustainable forest management: the case of Ghana. Forest Ecol Manag 149: 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel S.H., Pinckney T.C. and Jaeger W.K. 1995. Smallholder wood production and population pressure in East Africa: evidence of an environmental Kuznets curve? Land Econ 71: 500–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak S. and Mercer D.E. 1998. Valuing soil conservation benefits of agroforestry: contour hedgerows in the Eastern Visayas, Philippines. Agr Econ 18: 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak S., Mercer D.E., Sills E. and Yang J. 2003. Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies. Agroforest Syst 57: 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell D.J. 2003. Uncertainty and adoption of sustainable farming systems. pp. 67–81. In: Babcock B.A., Fraser R.W. and Lekakis J.N. (eds) Risk Management and the Environment: Agriculture in Perspective. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perz S.G. 2003. Social determinants and land use correlates of agricultural technology adoption in a forest frontier: a case study in the Brazilian Amazon. Human Ecol 31: 133–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pingali P., Bigot Y. and Binswanger H.P. 1987. Agricultural mechanization and the evolution of farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 216 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Place F., Franzel S., DeWolf J., Rommelse R., Kweisga F., Niang A. and Jama B. 2002. Agroforestry for soil-fertility replenishment: evidence on adoption processes in Kenya and Zambia. pp. 155– 168. In: Barrett C.B., Place F. and Aboud A. (eds) Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq M., Amacher G.S. and Hyde W.F. 2000. Innovation and ad-option in Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province. pp. 87–100. In: Hyde W.F. and Amacher G.S. (eds) Economics of Forestry and Rural Development: An Empirical Introduction from Asia. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raintree J.B. 1983. Strategies for enhancing the adoptability of agroforestry innovations. Agroforest Syst 1: 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raintree J.B. and Warner K. 1986. Agroforestry pathways for the intensification of shifting cultivation. Agroforest Syst 4: 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajasekharan P. and Veeraputhran S. 2002. Adoption of intercrop-ping in rubber smallholdings in Kerala, India: a tobit analysis. Agroforest Syst 56: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E.M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd Edition. The Free Press, New York. 367 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E.M. and Shoemaker F.F. 1971. Communication of Innov-ations: A Cross Cultural Approach. The Free Press, New York. 476 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg N. 1976. On technological expectations. Econ J 86: 523– 535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan V.W. and Hayami Y. 1984. Induced innovation model of agricultural development. pp. 59–74. In: Clark C.K. and Staatz J.M. (eds) Agricultural Development in the Third World. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan V.W. 1996. What happened to technology adoption–diffusion research? Sociologia Ruralis 36: 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sain G. and Barreto H. 1996. The adoption of soil conservation tech-nology in El Salvador: linking productivity and conservation. J Soil Water Conserv 51: 1495–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salam M.A., Noguchi T. and Koike M. 2000. Understanding why farmers plant trees in the homestead agroforestry in Bangladesh. Agroforest Syst 50: 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez P.A. 1995. Science in agroforestry. Agroforest Syst 30: 5– 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar J. 1998. Technological diffusion: alternative theories and historical evidence. J Econ Surv 12: 131–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr S.J. 1991a. On-farm research: the challenges of agroforestry. Agroforest Syst 15: 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherr S.J. 1991b. Methods for Participatory On-Farm Agroforestry Research: Summary Proceedings of an International Workshop. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry ( ICRAF ), Nairobi. 72 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr S.J. 1992. Not out of the woods yet: challenges for econom-

    Google Scholar 

  • ics research on agroforestry. Am J Agr Econ 74: 802–808. Scherr S.J. 1995. Economic factors in farmer adoption: patterns

    Google Scholar 

  • observed in Western Kenya. World Dev 23: 787–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr S.J. 2000. A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food Policy 25: 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shively G. 1997. Consumption risk, farm characteristics, and soil conservation adoption among low-income farmers in the Philip-pines. Agr Econ 17: 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shively G. 1999a. Risks and returns from soil conservation: evid-ence from low-income farms in the Philippines. Agr Econ 21: 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shively G. 1999b. Prices and tree planting on hillside farms in Palawan. World Dev 27: 937–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shively G. 2001. Poverty, consumption risk, and soil conservation. J Dev Econ 65: 267–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons C.S., Walker R.T. and Wood C.H. 2002. Tree planting by small producers in the tropics: a comparative study of Brazil and Panama. Agroforest Syst 56: 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderlin W.D. 1997. An ex-post methodology for measuring poor people’s participation in social forestry: an example from Java. Agroforest Syst 37: 297–3 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinkels R. and Franzel S. 1997. Adoption potential of hedgerow intercropping systems in the highlands of Western Kenya: II. Economic and farmers’ evaluation. Exp Agr 33: 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinkels R. and Scherr S.J. 1991. Economic Analysis of Agro-forestry Technologies: An Annotated Bibliography. ICRAF. Nairobi, Kenya. 215 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinkels R., Shepherd K.D., Franzel S., Ndufa J.K., Ohl sson E. and Sjogren H. 2002. Assessing the adoption potential of hedgerow intercropping for improving soil fertility, Western Kenya. pp. 89– 110. In: Franzel S. and Scherr S.J. (eds) Trees on the Farm: Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agrforestry Practices in Africa. CABI, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale M. and Heisey P.W. 1993. Simultaneous estimation of seed-fertilizer adoption decisions. Technol Forecast Soc 43: 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thacher T., Lee D. and Schellas J. 1997. Farmer Participation in reforestation incentive programs in Costa Rica. Agroforest Syst 35: 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner B.L., II and Ali A.M.S. 1996. Induced intensification: agri-cultural change in Bangladesh with implications for Malthus and Boserup. P Natl Acad Sci, USA 93: 14984–1499 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosti S.A., Witcover J., Oliveira S. and Faminow M. 1998. Policy issues in agroforestry: technology adoption and regional in-tegration in the western Brazil Amazon. Agroforest Syst 38: 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegers E.S., Hijmans R.J., Hervé D. and Fresco L.O. 1999. Land use intensification and disintensification in the upper Cañete Valley, Peru. Human Ecol 27: 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum K.F. 1994. Farmer adoption of contour hedgerow inter-cropping, a case study from east Indonesia. Agroforest Syst 27: 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 3041 Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12254, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA

    D. E. Mercer

Authors
  1. D. E. Mercer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

P. K. R. Nair M. R. Rao L. E. Buck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mercer, D.E. (2004). Adoption of agroforestry innovations in the tropics: A review. In: Nair, P.K.R., Rao, M.R., Buck, L.E. (eds) New Vistas in Agroforestry. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2424-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6673-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2424-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation