Abstract
The so-called New Theory of Reference (Marcus. Kripke etc.) is inspired by the insight that in modal and intensional contexts quantifiers presuppose nondescriptive unanalyzable identity criteria which do not reduce to any descriptive conditions. From this valid insight the New Theorists fallaciously move to the idea that free singular terms can exhibit a built-in direct reference and that there is even a special class of singular terms (proper names) necessarily exhibiting direct reference. This fallacious move has been encouraged by a mistaken belief in the substitutional interpretation of quantifiers. by the myth of the de re reference, and a mistaken assimilation of “direct reference” to ostensive (perspectival) identification. The de ditto vs. de re contrast does not involve direct reference, being merely a matter of rule-ordering (“scope”).
The New Theorists’ thesis of the necessity of identities of directly referred-to individuals is a consequence of an unmotivated and arbitrary restriction they tacitly impose on the identification of individuals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cocchiarella, Nino: I975a,’On the Primary and Secondary Semantics of Logical Necessity’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, pp. 13–27.
Cocchiarella, Nino: 1975b, ‘Logical Atomism, Nominalism, and Modal logic’, Synthese 31, pp. 23–62.
Cocchiarella, Nino: 1986, Logical Investigations of Predication Theory and the Problem of Universals. Bibliopolis.
Donnellan, Keith: 1966, ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’. The Philosophical Review 75, pp. 281–304.
Fagin, Ronald, Halpern, Joseph Y.. Yoram Moses and Moshe Y. Vardi: 1995, Reasoning about Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1956, ‘Identity. Variables and Impredicative Definitions’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 21, pp. 225–45.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1973, Logic, Language-Games and Information, Clarendon Press. Oxford.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1975a, ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance— Individuation by Acquaintance’, in Knowledge of the Known, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 212–33.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1975b, ‘Objects of Knowledge and Belief’, in The Intentions of Intentionality, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 43–58.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1980, ‘Standard vs. Nonstandard Logic: Higher Order. Modal and First-Order Logics’, in E. Agazzi (ed.) Modern Logic: A Survey, Boston, D. Reidel, pp. 283–96.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1982, ‘Is Alethic Modal Logic Possible?’. Acta Philosophica Fennica 35, pp. 89–105.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1990, ‘Paradigms for Language Theory’, in L. Haaparanta et. al. (eds.), Language, Knowledge, and Intentionality: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka (Acta Philosophica Fennica 49 ), Societas Philosophica Fennica, Helsinki, pp. 181–209.
Hintikka, Jaakko, 1992, ‘Different Constructions in Terms of ‘Knows“, in R. Dancy and E. Sosa (eds.), Companion to Epistemology, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 99–104.
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1996, ‘Knowledge Acknowledged: Knowledge of Propositions vs.
Knowledge of Objects’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Resew._ h forthcoming. Hintikka, Jaakko: forthcoming, The Principles of Mathematics Revisited,Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
Hintikka, Jaakko, and Merrill B. Hintikka: 1982, ‘Towards a General Theory of Identification’, in Werner Leinfellner et al. (eds.) Language and Ontology: Proceedings of the Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium, Holder-Oichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 137–50.
Hintikka, Jaakko and Jack Kulas: 1985, Anaphora and Definite Descriptions, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Hintikka, Jaakko and Gabriel Sandu: 1989, ‘Informational Independence as a Semantical Phenomenon’, in J. E. Fenstad et al. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VIII, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 571–89.
Kanger, Stig: 1957, Provability in Logic, Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
Kaplan, David: 1969. ‘Quantifying In’, in Donald Davidson and Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 178–214.
Kaplan, David: 1989, ‘Demonstratives’, in J. Almog et al. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press. New York.
Kripke, Saul: 1972. ‘Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht. pp. 253–5.
Kripke, Saul: 1976. ‘Is There a Problem about Substitutional Quantification?’ in G. Evans and J. McDowell (eds.). Truth and Meaning, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 325–419.
Kripke, Saul: 1977. ‘Identity and Necessity’, in Stephen P. Schwartz (ed.), Naming. Necessity and Natural Kinds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. N.Y., pp. 66–101.
Kripke, Saul: 1979a, ‘Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference’, in P. French et al. (eds.). Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophe of Language. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis. pp. 6–27.
Kripke, Saul: 1979b, ‘A Puzzle about Belief’, in A. Margalit (ed.). Meaning and Use, D. Reidel, Dordrecht. pp. 239–83.
Marcus. Ruth Barcan: 1947, ‘The Identity of Individuals in a Strict Functional Calculus of Second Order. Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, pp. 12–5.
Marcus. Ruth Barcan: 1961, ‘Modalities and Intensional Languages’, Synthese 13, pp. 303–22.
Marcus, Ruth Barcan: 1961, ‘Interpreting Quantification’, Inquiry 51. pp. 252–9. Marcus. Ruth Barcan: 1972, ‘Quantification and Ontology’. Nous 6. pp. 240–50.
Marcus, Ruth Barcan: 1995. Modalities,Oxford University Press.
Montague, Richard: 1974, Formal Philosophy,Yale University Press, New Haven. Quine, W. V. O.: 1939, ‘Designation and Existence’, The Journal of Philosophy 36 pp. 701 — 9.
Quine. W. V. O.: 1961, ‘Reply to Professor Marcus’, Synthese 13, pp. 323–30. Russell, Bertrand: 1905, ‘On Denoting’, Mind 14, pp. 479–93.
Russell, Bertrand: 1918, ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’. in Mysticism and Logic, Longmans, Green & Co., London, pp. 209–32.
Sandu, Gabriel: forthcoming, ‘Independence-Friendly Logic and Truth-Definitions’, Journal of Philosophical Logic.
Smith, Quentin: 1994, ‘Marcus, Kripke, and the Origin of the New Theory of Reference’ (abstract), Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, vol. 68, no. 1, p. 94.
Vaina. Lucia M.: 1990, “What’ and ‘Where’ in the Human Visual System: Two Hierarchies of Visual Modalities’, Synthese 83, pp. 49–91.
Wittgenstein. Ludwig: 1922, Tractatus Logico-philosophicus, Kegan Paul, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sandu, G. (1998). The Fallacies of the New Theory of Reference. In: Paradigms for Language Theory and Other Essays. Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2531-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2531-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4930-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2531-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive