Skip to main content

Dividing Attention between Temporal and Nontemporal Tasks: A Performance Operating Characteristic -POC- Analysis

  • Chapter
Time, Action and Cognition

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASID,volume 66))

Abstract

In order to study the influence of attention on time perception, a strategy is proposed that is a combination of two methods. One method is the sharing of attention between temporal and nontemporal information. The other method is that used to trace a Performance Operating Characteristics (POC) curve; the POC curve serves to investigate the relative cost of concurrent tasks when the subject is asked to allocate different amounts of attention to each of two tasks. The tasks are (1) duration discrimination between two confusable time intervals and (2) loudness discrimination between two confusable auditory intensities. Five different conditions of allocation are manipulated, and two durations are investigated: 500 and 1500 ms. The results suggest: (1) that both the temporal and the nontemporal performances suffer from attention sharing, which decreases the amount of attention to a given task and thus increases the number of discrimination errors; and (2) that when less attention is allocated to the passage of time, the perceived duration seems shorter at 500 ms but not at 1500 ms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allan, L. G. (1979) The perception of time. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, R. A. (1989) A contextualistic view of time and mind. in J. T. Fraser (Ed.). Time and Mind: an interdisciplinaryIssues. International Universities Press, Madison, Co., pp. 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, R. A. (1990) Cognitive models of psychological time. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, R. A. and Reed, M. A. (1978) Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 656–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. (1958) Perception and Communication. Pergamon Press, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. W. and West, A. N. (1990) Multiple timing and the allocation of attention. Acta Psychologica, 75, 103–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, P. (1978) Time and rhythm perception. in E. Carterette and M. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception VIII. Academic Press, New York, pp. 203–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty, D. (1975) Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D. and Donchin, E. (1986) Workload–An examination of the concept. in K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J. P. Thomas (Eds). Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. John Wiley, New York, pp. 41–1–41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, S. and Rousseau, R. (1991) Judging the relative duration of multimodal short empty time intervals. Perception and Psychophysics, 49, 245–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W. and Kinsbourne, M. (1976) Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 719–730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., Gaes, G. and Bierman, K. (1977) Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in-passing. American Journal of Psychology, 90, 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killeen, P. R. and Weiss, N. A. (1987) Optimal timing and the Weber function. Psychological Review, 94, 455–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1982) Experimental design: Procedure for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristofferson, A. B. (1977). A real-time criterion theory of duration discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 105–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClain, L. (1983) Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 185–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meck, W. H. (1984) Attentional bias between modalities: Effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences: Timing and Time Perception, 423, 528–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D. and Gopher, D. (1979) On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, R. (1969) On the experience of time. Penguin, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poynter, W. D. (1989) Inferring time’s passage. In I. Levin and Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 305–331.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poynter, W. D. and Homa, D. (1983) Duration judgment and the experience of change. Perception and Psychophysics, 33, 548–560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R., Picard, D. and Pitre, E. (1984) An adaptive counter model for time estimation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 639–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G. (1984) A unified theory of attention and signal detection. in R. Parasuraman and D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press, pp. 103–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G. and Melcher, M. J. (1978) The attention operating characteristic: Examples from visual search. Science, 202, 315–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E. A. C. and Weaver, W. B. (1975) Cognitive processing and time perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakay, D. (1989) An integrated model of time estimation. in I. Levin and D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 365–397.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grondin, S., Macar, F. (1992). Dividing Attention between Temporal and Nontemporal Tasks: A Performance Operating Characteristic -POC- Analysis. In: Macar, F., Pouthas, V., Friedman, W.J. (eds) Time, Action and Cognition. NATO ASI Series, vol 66. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3536-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3536-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4166-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3536-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics