Skip to main content

The Role of Evaluation as an Educational Space Planning Tool

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Learning Environments Research ((ALER))

Abstract

When an educational facility is to be built or refurbished, ideally a team of educators, designers and governing educational bodies’ representatives work together to ensure the facility reflects the educational institution’s beliefs, the needs of the teaching staff, and the desired learning outcomes of its students. The ultimate aim should be to ensure the new facility supports the learners in the most effective way based on latest developments in educational theory, and research into ‘what works’ in spatial design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. ACT21S. (2012). Assessment of teaching of 21st century skills project. Retrieved from http://www.atc21s.org/

  2. Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. New York, NY: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bransford, J. (2000). How people learn [electronic resource]: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, A., & Dawson, R. (1999). Evaluation research [Electronic resource]: An introduction to principles, methods and practice. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Cleveland, B. (2015). Tipping points in education design: Looking forwards, looking back. Architecture Australia, 104(1), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cleveland, B. W. (2011). Engaging spaces: Innovative learning environments, pedagogies and student engagement in the middle years of school (Unpublished PhD dissertation). The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cleveland, B., & Imms, W. (2015). Improving the (not so) new landscape of teaching and learning. Professional Educator, 14(2), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooperrider, D. L., Stavros, J. M., & Whitney, D. K. (2008). Appreciative inquiry handbook [electronic resource]: For leaders of change (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA & Ohio, OH: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deleuze, G., Massumi, B., & Guattari, F. (2008). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Department for Education. (2005). Building bulletin 77 – Ergonomic content review. Loughborough: © Ergonomics Safety Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism, architecture, identity, power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Earthman, G. I. (2009). Planning educational facilities: What educators need to know. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fenwick, T. (2010). Re-thinking the “thing” sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1–2), 104–116.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2012). Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. World Development, 40, 2399–2410. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffin, P. E., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills [electronic resource] (P. Griffin, B. McGaw, E. Care, Eds.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands & New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Imms, W. (2016). Occupying curriculum as space. In K. Fisher (Ed.). The translational design of schools: An evidence-based approach to aligning pedagogy and learning environments in schools (pp. 145–155). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from http://www.nmc.org/publication/nmc-horizon-report-2014-k-12-edition/

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 23(6), 695–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McInerney, D. M. (2010). Educational psychology: Constructing learning. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 575–595. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Myers, N. R. S. (2004). Creating connections – The CEFPI guide for educational facility planning. Phoenix, AZ: The Council of Educational Facility Planners, Intl.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Norrish, J. M. W., Paige, O’. M., & Robinson, J. (2013). An applied framework for positive education. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O’Donnell, A. M., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Educational psychology: Reflection for action. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. OECD. (2013). Innovative learning environments. Educational research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Patton, M. Q. (2005). Developmental evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rusk, R. D., & Waters, L. E. (2013). Tracing the size, reach, impact, and breadth of positive psychology. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(3), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. The American Psychologist, (1), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Streatfield, D., & Markless, S. (1994). Invisible learning?: The contribution of school libraries to teaching and learning (Library and Information Research Report, 98). London: British Library Research and Development Department.

    Google Scholar 

  31. The-World-Bank-Group. (2014). Strategic framework for mainstreaming citizen engagement in world bank group operations (p. 188). Washington, DC: The World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sala-Oviedo, A., Imms, W. (2016). The Role of Evaluation as an Educational Space Planning Tool. In: Imms, W., Cleveland, B., Fisher, K. (eds) Evaluating Learning Environments. Advances in Learning Environments Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-537-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-537-1_11

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-537-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics