Abstract
Tree adjoining grammars (TAGs) are mildly context-sensitive psycholinguistic formalisms that are hard to parse. All standard TAG parsers have a worst-case complexity of O(n6), despite being one of the most linguistically relevant grammars. For comprehensive syntax analysis, especially of ambiguous natural language constructs, most TAG parsers will have to run exhaustively, bringing them close to worst-case runtimes, in order to derive all possible parse trees. In this paper, we present a new and intuitive genetic algorithm, a few fitness functions and an implementation strategy for lexicalised-TAG parsing, so that we might get multiple ambiguous derivations efficiently.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Joshi, A. K., Levy, L. S., Takahashi, M.: Tree adjunct grammars. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 10, 1, 136–163 (1975).
Schuler, W.: Preserving semantic dependencies in synchronous Tree Adjoining Grammar. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics (ACL’99). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 88–95 (1999).
Joshi, A. K., Schabes, Y.: Tree-adjoining grammars. Handbook of formal languages, vol. 3, Rozenberg, G. and Salomaa, A., (eds.). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., USA, pp. 69–123. (1997).
Vijay-Shankar, K., Joshi, A. K.: Some computational properties of Tree Adjoining Grammars. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’85). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 82–93. (1985).
Shieber, S. M., Schabes, Y.: Synchronous tree-adjoining grammars. In: Proceedings of the 13th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 3 (COLING’90), Karlgren, H. (Ed.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 253–258. (1990).
Schabes, Y., Joshi, A. K.: An Earley-type parsing algorithm for Tree Adjoining Grammars. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’88). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp. 258–269 (1988).
Menon, V. K.: English to Indian Languages Machine Translation using LTAG. CEN, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham University. Master’s Thesis. Coimbatore, India, doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.5078.5048 (2008).
Menon, V. K., Rajendran, S., Soman, K. P.: A Synchronised Tree Adjoining Grammar for English to Tamil Machine Translation. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Kochi, India, pp. 1497–1501, doi:10.1109/ICACCI.2015.7275824. (2015).
Dediu, A. H., Tîrnauca, C. I.: Parsing Tree Adjoining Grammars using Evolutionary Algorithms. In: ICAART. (2009).
Araujo, L.: Evolutionary Parsing for a Probabilistic Context Free Grammar. In: Revised Papers from the Second International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC ‘00). Ziarko, W. and Yao, Y. Y., (eds.). Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp. 590–597. (2000).
The XTAG Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~xtag/tech-report/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Menon, V.K., Soman, K.P. (2018). A New Evolutionary Parsing Algorithm for LTAG. In: Sa, P., Sahoo, M., Murugappan, M., Wu, Y., Majhi, B. (eds) Progress in Intelligent Computing Techniques: Theory, Practice, and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 518. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3373-5_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3373-5_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3372-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3373-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)