Skip to main content

The Effectiveness of MOOC Among Learners Based on Kirkpatrick’s Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Redesigning Learning for Greater Social Impact

Abstract

Massive open online course (MOOCs) are transforming the era of distance learning education in a groundbreaking way that it has attracted a huge amount of attention from the media, education institutions, and education professionals. The purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of courses delivered using MOOCs in Taylor’s University. The Kirkpatrick’s four levels of evaluation learning model were adapted to measure the effectiveness of MOOCs. A descriptive survey of 250 learners was conducted. The study indicated that comprehensive study materials in MOOCs are useful for the learners as future reference. MOOCs are effective in the sense that it helps learners to understand a certain topic and apply it in real life. The program has met the learners’ expectations, and they will strongly recommend the course to other people. Nevertheless, learners think that the study materials are sufficient for beginners, but advanced course is needed to meet their future job expectation. This study focuses on MOOCs in OpenLearning platform only. In the future, research can be expanded to focus on different MOOC platforms besides OpenLearning. Lastly, with the result obtained in this research, it will be able to contribute to the community of MOOC and institutions that plan to introduce MOOCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ari, M.B. (2013). MOOCs on introductory programming, ACM Inroads, 4(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayub, E., & Lim, C.L. (2016). Developing a pedagogy framework for institution-wide implementation of MOOC: A case study from a Malaysian Private University. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-H., & Chen, P.-J. (2015). MOOC study group: facilitation strategies, influential factors and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Y. P. (2012). Mastering research methods. Kuala Lumpur: McGrawHill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garza, L. Y., Sancho-Vinuesa, T., & Gomez Zermeno M. G. (2015). Indicators of pedagogical quality for the design of a massive open online course for teacher training. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 104–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gene, O.B., Nunez, M.M., & Blanco, A.F. (2014). Gamification in MOOC: Challenges, opportunities and proposals for advancing MOOC model. In TEEM 2014, Salamanca, Spain (pp. 215–220), October 01–03, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, W. W., Kaur, S., & Chion, Z. H. (2015). The Perceptions of MOOC Among learners based on activity theory. In Taylor’s 7th Teaching and Learning Conference 2014 Proceedings, (pp. 331–340).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Zermeno, M. G., & Garza, L. A. (2016). Research analysis on MOOC course dropout and retention rates. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosseck, G., Holotescu, C., Bran, R., & Ivanova, M. (2015). A checklist for a MOOC activist. In The 11th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, April, 23-24, Bucharest, 538-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Z. (2016). Application and empirical investigation of new MOOC teaching system in computer application course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(5), 62–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: A comparison study. In Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on experiences and best practices in and around MOOCs (EMOOCS), Austria (pp. 15–26), February 22–24, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansor, F., Latifah, A. L., & Tengku Amina, M. (2015). MOOCs in Malaysia: A preliminary case study. In E-ASEM Forum: Renewing the lifelong learning agenda for the future, Bali, Indonesia (pp. 1–17), March 10-11, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education Malaysia (2015). Malaysian education blueprint on higher education—shift 10: Globalized Online Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhstak, A-A. (2014). Entrepreneurship: The first MOOC in Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Merino, P. J., Ruiperez-Valiente, J. A., Alario-Hoyos, C., Perez-Sanagustin, M., & Kloos, C. D. (2015). Precise effectiveness strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with educational resources and activities in MOOCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nor Fadzleen, S. D., Rose, A. A., & Naoki, O. (2015). Stakeholders’ view on MOOCs sustainability in Malaysian higher education: A preliminary study. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(23), 18104–18112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunez, M. M., Gene, O. B., & Blanco, A. F. (2014). Social community in MOOCs: Practical implication and outcomes. In TEEM 2014, Salamanca, Spain (pp. 147–154), October 01–03, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnaria, W., Azizudin, M. S., Bakri, M., Muhammad, S., & Khaliza, S. (2015). Sharing works and copyright issues in Massive Open Online Courseware (MOOC). International Journal for Research in emerging science and technology, 2(10), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, V. (2015). A systematic review of the socio-ethical aspects of massive online open courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 18(1), 52–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terras, M. M., & Ramsay, J. (2015). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 472–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, L., & Potwell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. UK: JISC Cetis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Wei Goh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goh, W.W., Wong, S.Y., Ayub, E. (2018). The Effectiveness of MOOC Among Learners Based on Kirkpatrick’s Model. In: Tang, S., Cheah, S. (eds) Redesigning Learning for Greater Social Impact. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4223-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4223-2_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4222-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4223-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics