Skip to main content

Innovative Learning Environments as Complex Adaptive Systems: Enabling Middle Years’ Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In a period of post-industrial education, how can we understand school learning environments i.e. educational spaces and practices that are concurrently physical, social and cultural? How might theoretical constructs that deal with ideas associated with ‘complexity’, ‘emergence’ and ‘self-organisation’ aid our interpretations of learning environments in the knowledge era? This chapter explores the emergence, co-evolution and mutual adaptation of the physical, social and cultural practices in three schools (primary and secondary) that attempted to develop contemporary pedagogical cultures of practice between 2008 and 2011 in non-traditional learning spaces. Employing theoretical frameworks derived from the literature on ‘complexity theory’ and ‘complex adaptive systems theory’, this chapter explores the influences of new socio-spatial contexts for learning (i.e. innovative learning environments) on the engagement of middle years’ students. To conclude, an argument is put forward for considering school learning environments, schools and school systems as ‘complex adaptive systems’: educational settings that can ‘learn’ in response to positive feedback loops to provide dynamic socio-pedagogical cultures of practice that are aligned with current middle years’ educational theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barratt, R. E. (1998). Shaping middle schooling in Australia: A report of the National Middle Schooling Project. Canberra, NSW: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beare, H. (2000). Creating the future school. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, D. F. (2006). Sustaining school improvement. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 3(1), 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. (2006). Rethinking middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartmel, T. (2013). Crafting the middle years mosaic. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 11(3), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W.‚ & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical – Education, knowledge and action research. Philadelphia: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, B. (2016). Addressing the spatial to catalyze socio-pedagogical reform in middle years’ education, 27–49. In Fisher, K. (Ed.), The translational design of schools. An evidence-based approach to aligning pedagogy and learning environments. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEET. (2002). Middle years research and development project: Executive summary. Department of Education, Employment and Training, VIC. www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/curricman/middleyear/research/MYRADExecSummary.doc. Accessed March 25, 2008.

  • Dovey, K. (2008). Framing places: Mediating power in built form. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, G. D. (1991). Habermas and education: A comprehensive overview of the influence of Habermas in educational literature. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 345–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crevola, C. (2007). Breakthrough. Heatherton, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Towards a rational society. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylighten, F. (2008). Complexity and self-organisation. In M. J. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylighten, F., Cilliers, P., & Gershenson, C. (2007). Complexity and philosophy. In J. Bogg & R. Geyer (Eds.), Complexity science and society. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P., & Russell, J. (1999). Systemic, whole-school reform of the middle years of schooling, National Middle Years of Schooling Conference, March 1999. Centre for Applied Educational Research, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P.A., & Smith, J. (1984). Exploring social geography. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, C. (2005) From hearing voices to engaging in dialogue: Problematising student participation in school improvement. Journal of Educational Change6(2):125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, M., & Kemmis, S. (2007). Praxis-related research: Serving two masters? Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(2), 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. (2005). Globalization, technological change, and public education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, D. (2006). Fast-tracking middle schooling reform: A model for sustainability. Australian Journal of Middle Schooling, 6(2), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendergast, D., & Bahr, N. (2005). Teaching middle years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. R. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2005). Not by breadth alone: Imagining a self-organised classroom. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 2(1)‚ 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skill, T. D., & Young, B. A. (2002). Embracing the hybrid model: Working at the intersections of virtual and physical learning spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 92, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strommen, E. & Lincoln, B. (1992). Constructivism, technology and the future of classroom learning. Education and Urban Society24(4), 466–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumara, D., & Davis, B. (2009). Complexity theory and action research. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), Educational Action Research. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upitis, R. (2004). School architecture and complexity. Complicity An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upitis, R. (2010a). Complexity and design: How school architecture influences learning. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 3(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upitis, R. (2010b). Raising a school: Foundations for school architecture. South Frontenac, ON: Wintergreen Studios Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2008). Climate change, travel and complex futures. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (2003). Complexity theory, globalization and diversity. Paper presented at the Conference of the British Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1982) Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups. Review of Educational Research‚ 52(3)‚ 421–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, A. (2007). Creating the ubiquitous classroom: Integrating physical and virtual learning spaces. The International Journal of Learning, 14(3), 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S. (2005). Designing a thinking curriculum. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandvliet, D. B., & Fraser, B. J. (2004). Learning environments in information and communications technology classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 97–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Cleveland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cleveland, B. (2018). Innovative Learning Environments as Complex Adaptive Systems: Enabling Middle Years’ Education. In: Benade, L., Jackson, M. (eds) Transforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5678-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5678-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5677-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5678-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics