Skip to main content

Task Dependence of Perceptual Deadzone

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kinesthetic Perception

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 748))

  • 682 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we study whether the perceptual deadzone depends on the task to be performed during the psychophysical experiments. In order to study this, we design a psychophysical experiment where we define two specific tasks: discriminative and comparative. In the discriminative task, the user must discriminate if the successive stimulus is different from the reference force, be it increasing or decreasing in magnitude. On the other hand, in case of the comparative task, the user has to discriminate the stimulus only along one direction, either increasing or decreasing in magnitude. Responses are recorded for both the tasks for several users. Support vector machine (SVM), a machine learning approach, is applied to the recorded responses to estimate the perceptual deadzone for each task. Our results demonstrate that comparative deadzone is significantly smaller than the discriminative deadzone in terms of their width and the just noticeable difference, suggesting that the task of discriminating two forces is more difficult for a user than to compare which force is greater (or smaller). Hence taking inference of this study, we demonstrate that the perceptual deadzone does depend on the task being performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bhardwaj A, Chaudhuri S, Dabeer O (2014) Design and analysis of predictive sampling of haptic signals. ACM Trans Appl Percept (TAP) 11(4):16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj A, Dabeer O, Chaudhuri S (2013) Can we improve over Weber sampling of haptic signals? In: Information Theory and Applications Workshop. San Diego CA, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition. Mach Learn 128:1–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cross DV (1973) Sequential dependencies and regression in psychophysical judgments. Percept Psychophys 14(3):547–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCarlo LT (2003) An application of a dynamic model of judgment to magnitude production. Percept Psychophys 65(1):152–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCarlo LT, Cross DV (1990) Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: models and theory. J Exp Psychol: Gen 119(4):375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenstein WH, Ehrenstein A (1999) Psychophysical methods. In: Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, pp 1211–1241

    Google Scholar 

  • Gescheider GA (2013) Psychophysics: the fundamentals. Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesteadt W, Luce RD, Green DM (1977) Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 3(1):92

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones LA, Tan HZ (2013) Application of psychophysical techniques to haptic research. IEEE Trans Haptics 6(3):268–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2009) Haptic perception: a tutorial. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(7):1439–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leek MR (2001) Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept Psychophys 63(8):1279–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockhead GR, King MC (1983) A memory model of sequential effects in scaling tasks. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 9(3):461

    Google Scholar 

  • Podlesek A (2010) Sequential effects are not trivial context effects in psychophysical research. Rev Psychol 17(1):39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson WA (1988) The method of constant stimuli is efficient. Percept Psychophys 44(5):433–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staddon J, King M, Lockhead GR (1980) On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 6(2):290

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhasis Chaudhuri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaudhuri, S., Bhardwaj, A. (2018). Task Dependence of Perceptual Deadzone. In: Kinesthetic Perception. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 748. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6692-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6692-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6691-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6692-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics