Abstract
Museums have become important locations for shaping and reshaping contemporary relations between post-colonial nations and indigenous cultures. The anthropologist James Clifford has used the term ‘contact zone’ to describe the indeterminacy and possibility that exists when the formal, anthropological knowledge held by curators and the embodied, evolving culture represented by indigenous groups encounter each other within the orbit of the contemporary museum. Clifford’s use of the term ‘contact zone’ is borrowed from the work of Mary Louise Pratt who used it rather in an historical sense to describe the strangeness and unanticipated outcomes for epistemology of encounters on the frontiers of European imperial expansion in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. This chapter will examine the architecture of four museums which in their institutional missions have foregrounded relations between contemporary nation–states and the communities descended from colonised people. These museums are the Tjibaou Cultural Centre, Noumea (completed 1998); Te Papa Tongarewa/Museum of New Zealand, Wellington (1997); National Museum of Australia, Canberra (2001); and the Musée du quai Branly, Paris (2006). Each museum is based on a different idealisation or conception of the contemporary emerging from the colonial histories which it represents: rapprochement between coloniser and colonised at Tjibaou; the post-colonial nation as ‘bicultural’ at Te Papa; the post-colonial nation as multicultural ‘mosaic’ at the NMA; rapprochement between a former coloniser and the formerly colonised at quai Branly. In each museum, architecture was charged with the responsibility to make these idealisations physically and experientially manifest even as architecture itself struggles with its own inheritances of elite, monocultural knowledge. For both Clifford and Pratt, the term ‘zone’ primarily entails a spatial metaphor; the contact zone is an epistemological space. The term ‘zone’, however, can also be taken to refer literally to the physical spaces of an institution or the geographical spaces where colonial encounters with the other took place. Indeed, both Clifford and Pratt often discuss or allude to just such ostensible places in their work. The chapter will bring their discussions of the ‘contact zone’ to bear in critique and analysis of its four key examples to consider what architecture could be in such a place, how it too could become a more labile and less determinate thing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Tramposch was employed in senior roles at Te Papa during its development and implementation.
- 2.
North Africa , however, has only a minor presence at the MQB , being instead strongly represented in other Paris institutions, the Institut du Monde Arabe which opened in its Nouvel building in 1987, and the Louvre ’s galleries of Islamic art, refurbished in 2012.
- 3.
Amato (2006: 60) lists other famous architects from whom designs ‘were sought’, including Tadao Ando, Christian de Portzamparc, Norman Foster and Rem Koolhaas.
- 4.
The problematic treatment of Aboriginal materials in the MQB is examined by Sauvage (2007: 145–147).
- 5.
Clifford (2007: 10–16) offers a thorough, critical account of the range of exhibition strategies in the MQB ’s permanent collections.
- 6.
On the lack of representation of non-Western people on the MQB staff, see Martin (2011: 60–61). Martin cites Bernard Dupaigne , Le Scandale des arts premiers, Paris : Mille et une nuits, 2006: 57.
- 7.
See http://www.quaibranly.fr/en/exhibitions-and-events/at-the-museum/exhibitions/event-details/e/maori-34383/ [accessed 17 Oct 2016].
- 8.
See also Thomas (2013): 37–40.
- 9.
See http://www.thearts.co.nz/news/michael-parekowhai-to-show-at-pariss-renowned-mus-e-du-quai-branly [accessed 17 Oct 2016].
- 10.
Brothers record the view of the MQB ’s president Stéphane Martin that up to a quarter of the MQB ’s visitors are ‘a new public who are coming because the museum speaks especially to them’.
References
Amato, S. (2006). Quai Branly Museum: Representing France after empire. Race & Class, 47(4), 46–65.
Armstrong, C. (2006). Australian Indigenous art commission. Sydney: Art & Australia.
Austin, M. (2000). The Tjibaou Culture Centre in New Caledonia. In M. Ostwald, & R. More (Eds.), Re-Framing architecture: Theory, science and myth (pp. 25–28). Sydney: Archadia Press.
Austin, M. (2007). Pacific cultural centres and antipodean museums. In M. Ostwald, & S. Fleming (Eds.), Museum, gallery, and cultural architecture in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Region: Essays in antipodean identity (pp. 149–159). Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
Bhatti, S. (2012). Translating museums: A counter history of South Asian museology. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Bossley, P. (1998). Te Papa: An architectural adventure. Wellington: Te Papa Press.
Brothers, C. (2009). Immigrants flock proudly to the Musée du Quai Branly. New York Times. 21 August. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/21/arts/design/21muse.html?scp=6&sq=Musée%20du%20quai%20branly&st=cse. Accessed 23 Oct 2016.
Brown, D. (2009). Māori Architecture: From fale to wharenui and beyond. Auckland: Raupo.
Brunt, P. (2012). Contemporary Pacific art and its globalization. In P. Brunt, & N. Thomas (Eds.), Art in Oceania: A new history (pp. 410–439). London: Thames & Hudson.
Casey, D. (2001). The National Museum of Australia: Exploring the past, illuminating the present and imagining the future. In D. McIntyre, & K. Wehner (Eds.), National Museums: Negotiating histories (pp. 3–11). Canberra: National Museum of Australia.
Chemetzky, P. (2008). Not what we expected: The Jewish Museum Berlin in practice. Museum and Society, 6(3), 216–245.
Chirac, J. (2006). Opening of the Musée du quai Branly, Speech by President Jacques Chirac. http://australiacouncil.gov.au/news/media-centre/speeches/opening-of-the-musee-du-quai-branly-speech-by-president-jacques-chirac/. Accessed 21 Oct 2016.
Clifford, J. (1988). Histories of the tribal and the modern. In J. Clifford (Ed.), The predicament of culture: Twentieth-Century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Clifford, J. (1997) Museums as contact zones. In J. Clifford (Ed.), Routes: Travel and translation in the late Twentieth Century (pp. 188–219). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Clifford, J. (2007). Quai Branly in Process, October, 120, 3–23.
Commonwealth of Australia. (1975). Museums in Australia 1975: Report of the Committee of the Inquiry on Museums and National Collections including the Report of the Planning Committee on the Gallery of Aboriginal Australia (The Piggott Report). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2003). Review of the National Museum of Australia, Its Exhibitions and Public Programs: A Report to the Council of the National Museum of Australia (NMA Review). Canberra: Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts.
Dalrymple, T. (1999). An amusement arcade masquerading as a museum. New Statesman, 12(542), 32–33.
Dean, D., & Rider, P. (2005). Museums, nation and political history in the Australian National Museum and the Canadian Museum of Civilization. Museum and Society, 3(1), 35–50.
Devine, M. (2001, March 21). Insult or a hidden code. Daily Telegraph, Sydney, 31.
Dibley, B. (2007). Antipodean aesthetics, public policy & the museum: Te Papa, for example, Cultural Studies Review, 13(1), 129–149.
Dutton, D. (1998). National treasure or dog’s breakfast? The Press, Christchurch, 20 May, 7. Reprinted as: New National Museum resembles a junk shop. New Zealand Herald, Auckland, May 21, A15; & Te Papa: National Embarrassment. The Weekend Australian, Sydney, June 6, 23.
Ellis, N. (2016). A Whakapapa of tradition: 100 years of Ngāti Porou carving, 1830–1930. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
Findley, L. (2005). Building change: Architecture, politics and cultural agency. London: Routledge.
Gentry, K. (2015). History, heritage, and colonialism: Historical consciousness, Britishness, and cultural identity in New Zealand, 1870–1940. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jencks, C. (2001a). Un significato per l’Australia/The meaning of Australia. Domus, 837, 96–115.
Jencks, C. (2001b). How to speak Australian. Architecture, 90(8), 82–91.
John Andrews International Pty. Ltd., & Talbot, F. (1977). Museum of Australia: Site Location Study. Stage C Optimum Functional Relationships.
Kasarherou, E. (1995). ‘Men of flesh and blood’: The Jean-Marie Tjibaou Cultural Centre in Noumea. Art and Asia Pacific, 2(4), 90–95.
Losche, D. (2003). Cultural forests and their objects in New Caledonia: The forest on Lifou. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Art, 4(1), 77–91.
Macarthur, J., & Stead, N. (2006). The National Museum of Australia as danse macarbre: Baroque allegories of the popular, In C. Healy & A Witcomb (Eds.), South Pacific Museums: Experiments in culture (pp. 19.1–19.3). Melbourne: Monash University ePress.
MacKenzie, J. (2009). Museums and empire: Natural history, human cultures and colonial identities. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Martin, A. (2011). Quai Branly Museum and the aesthetic of otherness. St Andrews Journal of Art History and Museum Studies, 15, 53–63.
McCarthy, C. (2007). Exhibiting Māori: A history of colonial cultures of display. Wellington: Te Papa Press.
McCarthy, C. (2011). Museums and Māori: Heritage professionals, Indigenous collections, current practice. Wellington: Te Papa Press.
McGill, D. (1985, February 5). Art world subtly shifts to corporate patronage. New York Times 27.
Message, K. (2006). Contested sites of identity and the cult of the new: The Centre Culturel Tjibaou and the constitution of culture in New Caledonia. Recollections: Journal of the National Museum of Australia, 1(1): 7–28.
Message, K. (2009). Culture, citizenship and Australian multiculturalism: The contest over identity formation at the National Museum of Australia. Humanities Research, 15(2), 23–48.
Naumann, P. (2006). Naturally in Paris. Architecture Australia, 95(5), 88–95.
Neill, A. (2004). National culture and the new museology. In A. Smith, & L. Wevers (Eds.), On display: New essays in cultural studies (pp. 180–196). Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Nouvel, J. (2002). Museo de quai Branly/Museum on quai Branly, In J. Nouvel, & R. Levene (Eds.), Jean Nouvel 1994–2002: The symbolic order of matter = el croquis 112/113 (p. 202). Madrid: El Croquis.
Piano, R. (1996). Renzo Piano building workshop: Cultural Center Jean Marie Tjibaou, Architecture + Urbanism 315, 92–102.
Pieris, A. (2016). Indigenous cultural centers and museums: An illustrated international survey. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Prakash, G. (1992). Science ‘Gone Native’ in Colonial India. Representations, 40, 153–178.
Pratt, M. (2008). Imperial Eyes: Travel writing and transculturation, (2nd ed.) London: Routledge (1st ed. 1992).
Price, S. (2007). Paris primitive: Jacques Chirac’s museum on the Quai Branly. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Project Development Team for the National Museum of New Zealand Te Marae Taonga o Aotearoa. (1985). Nga Taonga o Te Motu/Treasures of the Nation—National Museum of New Zealand/Te Marae Taonga o Aotearoa: A plan for development. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.
Reed, D. (2002). A volatile history. In D. Reed (ed.), Tangled histories: National Museum of Australia (p. 3). Musgrave: Images Publishing.
Sauvage, A. (2007). Narratives of colonisation: The Musée du quai Branly in context. reCollections: Journal of the National Museum of Australia, 2(2), 135–152.
Skinner, D. (2008). The carver and the artist: Māori art in the twentieth century. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
Thomas, D. (2013). Museology and globalization: The quai Branly Museum. Africa and France: Postcolonial cultures, migration, and racism (pp. 14–41). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Thomas, N. (1999). Possessions: Indigenous art/colonial culture. London: Thames & Hudson.
Thomas, N. (2016). Global reach, Apollo, 31–34
Tramposch, W. (1998a). Te Papa: An invitation for redefinition. Museum International, 50(3), 28–32.
Tramposch, W. (1998b). Te Papa: Reinventing the museum. Museum Management and Curatorship, 17(4), 339–350.
Walker, P. (1996). The ‘Maori house’ at the Canterbury Museum, Interstices, 4 (cd-rom).
Walker, P. (2007). Institutional audiences and architectural style: The Napier Museum. In P. Scriver, & V. Prakash (Eds.), Colonial modernities: Building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon (pp. 127–147). London: Routledge.
Walker, P. (2012). Culture. In G. Crysler, S. Cairns, & H. Heynen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of architectural theory (pp. 369–382). London: Sage.
Walker, P., & Clark, J. (2004). Museum and archive: Framing the Treaty. In A. Smith, & L. Wevers (Eds.), On display: New essays in cultural studies (pp. 162–179). Wellington: Victoria University Press.
Weller, R. (2001). The National Museum Canberra, and its Garden of Australian Dreams. Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed Landscapes, 21(1), 66–84.
Williams, P. (2005). A breach on the beach: Te Papa and the fraying of biculturalism. Museum and Society, 3(2), 81–97.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walker, P. (2018). Architecture of the Contact Zone: Four Post-colonial Museums. In: Grant, E., Greenop, K., Refiti, A., Glenn, D. (eds) The Handbook of Contemporary Indigenous Architecture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6903-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6904-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)