Skip to main content

Space, Place and University Society: Insights from Common-Pool Resource Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spaces of Teaching and Learning

Part of the book series: Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice ((UTLP))

Abstract

The possible connections between the physical character of the university and its academic effectiveness have, over the last decade or so, become a focus of increasing research and professional interest. I have previously suggested that a means of understanding the connections between the two may be found by studying the transformation of space into place; I have in earlier work conceptualised this change in terms of social capital theory. Recent studies, from different higher education systems, sometimes drawing on concepts of structure and agency , have shown how disciplinary communities of various kinds may both create and ‘own’ campus places , providing ideas about which features or processes may support this place-making. These findings, I propose, may be viewed in a theoretical framework based on the ‘common-pool resource’ (CPR) theory, associated with the work of Ostrom. Social capital formation was an explanatory variable in the cases she and others have studied. CPR studies were initially of water resources, fisheries and the like, managed cooperatively to maximise sustainable benefits, but the theoretical ideas have been applied to other resources, tangible and non-tangible, that may be used in common. I shall consider, whether understanding university space in this way may point to different approaches to planning and managing it to improve, particularly, teaching and learning effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the university: In an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham, UK: SRHE & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyes, T., & Michels, C. (2011). The production of educational space: Heterotopia and the business university. Management Learning, 42(5), 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2010). Reinventing management: Smarter choices for getting work done. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddington, A., & Boys, J. (Eds.). (2011). Re-shaping learning: A critical reader. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boys, J. (2011). Where is the theory? In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.), Re-shaping learning: A critical reader. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boys, J., & Smith, H. (2011). What do we know about what is being built? New typologies of learning spaces. In A. Boddington & J. Boys (Eds.), Re-shaping learning: A critical reader. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browndorf, M. (2014). Student library ownership and building the communicative commons. Journal of Library Administration, 54, 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, J., Roberts, P., & Taylor, I. (2015). University trends: Contemporary campus design. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A., Herrick, T., & Keating, P. (2012). Accommodations: Staff identity and university space. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), 697–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Botton, A. (2007). The architecture of happiness. London, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (2016). Managerialism, garbage cans, and collegial governance: Reflections on an economic perspective of university behaviour. In R. Barnett, P. Temple, & P. Scott (Eds.), Valuing higher education: An appreciation of the work of Gareth Williams. London, UK: IOE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittoe, W. (2006). Seriously cool places: The future of learning-centered built environments. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces. Washington DC, WA, USA: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., & Worden, E. (2016). Creating interdisciplinary space on campus: Lessons from US area studies centers. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. (2002). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31(1), 35–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, K. (2014). Sensing spaces: Architecture reimagined. Exhibition catalogue. London, UK: Royal Academy of Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (2007). The future of management. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatherley, O. (2015). Landscapes of communism: A history through buildings. London, UK: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2011). Introduction: An overview of the knowledge commons. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T., Gubby, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Space frontiers for new pedagogies: A tale of constraints and possibilities. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Sutcliffe, M., Bragg, J., & Harris, D. (2016). To what extent is capital expenditure in UK higher education meeting the pedagogical needs of staff and students? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(4), 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntz, A., Petrovic, J., & Ginocchio, L. (2012). A changing sense of place: A case study of academic culture and the built environment. Higher Education Policy, 25, 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P. (2011). Collective action, civic engagement, and the knowledge commons. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, A. (1989). A modern enigma: A paradox of reduction and enrichment. In W. Buchanan (Ed.), Mackintosh’s masterwork: The Glasgow School of Art. Glasgow, UK: Richard Drew Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, A. (2014). Managing the campus: Facility management and design, the student experience and university effectiveness. In P. Temple (Ed.), The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordquist, J. (2016). Alignment achieved? The learning landscape and curricula in health profession education. Medical Education, 50, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgard, R., & Bengtsen, S. (2016). Academic citizenship beyond the campus: A call for the placeful university. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossa-Richardson, A. (2007). A difficult place to find one’s way about in: York University campus and the problem of architectural identity (Unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ossa-Richardson, A. (2014). The idea of a university and its concrete form. In P. Temple (Ed.), The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., & Hess, C. (2011). A framework for analyzing the knowledge commons. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, J., Austin, S., & Lansdale, M. (2005). Research environments for higher education. Loughborough, UK: Departments of Civil and Building Engineering and Human Sciences, Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailer, K., Marmot, A., & Penn, A. (2012). Spatial configuration, organisational change and academic networks. Paper presented at the Conference on Applied Social Network Analysis, 4–7 September 2012, Zürich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, P. (Ed.). (2014a). The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, P. (2014b). Space, place and university effectiveness. In P. Temple (Ed.), The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2016, 29 October). “Bagehotcolumn (p. 30). The Economist. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (2010/1968). The campus as a context for learning. In M. Burrage (Ed.), Martin Trow: Twentieth-century higher education: Elite to mass to universal. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Temple .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Temple, P. (2018). Space, Place and University Society: Insights from Common-Pool Resource Theory. In: Ellis, R., Goodyear, P. (eds) Spaces of Teaching and Learning. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7154-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7155-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics