Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of the Teaching Effect of ‘Flipped’ MOOC Class and Conventional Class

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1594 Accesses

Part of the book series: Education Innovation Series ((EDIN))

Abstract

MOOC and flipped classes are models of instruction which have sprung up in the last few years, in educational circles all over the world. In the School of Physics and Engineering at Tongji University, we have integrated a flipped class into a MOOC teaching method, which is called a ‘flipped’ MOOC class. The aim of this paper is to assess whether this improves the quality of instruction in university physics classes and enhances student performance. Two second-year physics classes were randomly chosen as the research subjects, with one class being taught in the conventional way and the other with the flipped MOOC method. In order to guarantee a reliable foundation for comparing students’ learning effectiveness in these two approaches, we analysed the rationality of the teaching process and the evaluation method. After a correlation analysis of the students’ records for both classes, we concluded that the flipped MOOC class showed an enhanced teaching effect and better student grades than the conventional class. In the process, we encountered some unexpected problems. So, we figured out why they were happening and reflected on how we could handle these difficulties if we wanted to promote quality instruction and improve students’ ability by this flipped MOOC approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ash, K. (2012). Educators evaluate ‘flipped classrooms. Education Week, 10, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannod, G. C., Burge, J. E., & Helmick, M. T. (2008). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. Proceedings from the ACM/IEEE 30th international conference on software engineering (pp. 777–786). Leipzig, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. G (2012). The inverted agricultural economics classroom: A new way to teach? Presented at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association AAEA annual meeting. Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environment Research, 15, 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The State Council. (2010). The national plan for medium- and long-term education reform and development (2010–2020). Beijing, China. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2010-07/29/content_1667143.htm (in Chinese).

  • Wang, X. D., & Zhang, C. J. Z. (2013). The application of research on flipped classroom in university teaching. Modern Educational Technology, 8, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G., Yang, W. Z., & Chen, L. (2012). Ten cases of ‘flipped classroom’. Educational Technology of Middle and Primary School, 8, 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. J. (2012). The change of flipped classroom. China Information Technology Education, 10, 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, X., Wu, H. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Teaching Effect of ‘Flipped’ MOOC Class and Conventional Class. In: Li, K., Yuen, K., Wong, B. (eds) Innovations in Open and Flexible Education. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7995-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7995-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7994-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7995-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics