Abstract
Single loop feedback control is commonly used in process control. The main drawback of single loop feedback control is its less effectiveness in rejecting the external disturbances. In order to improve speed of disturbance rejection and stability of closed-loop system, cascade control was studied and analyzed. To design the cascade control, first-order plus deadtime (FOPDT) models of both inner and outer loop were developed and applied for both sequential and simultaneous tuning methods. For sequential tuning, an IMC-based tuning was used whereas for simultaneous tuning method, Multiscale and Enhanced Cascade Control tunings were chosen. Relative performance of various controller settings for single and cascade control were compared. Moreover, recommendation for optimized tuning used “Step Response Checker” from System Design Toolbox was also elaborated and tested. Performance results were evaluated through Minimum Integral Error measurement. The effectiveness of the tuning methods was compared and evaluated using a lab-scale air flow rig.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Riggs, J.B., Karim, M.N.: Chemical and Bio-process Control. 3rd edn. Pearson Education International, Boston (2007)
Nise, N.S.: Control System Engineering, 4th edn., pp. 255–263. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)
Thirumarimurugan, M., Mahalakshmi, D., Sivakumar, V.M., Dinesh Kumar, V.: Evaluation of series and parallel cascade using optimal controller. Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Eng. (IJAREEIE) 5(Special Issue 1), 122–126 (2016)
Nandong, J., Zang, Z.: Generalised multi-scale control scheme for cascade processes with time-delays. J. Process Control. 24, 1057–1067 (2014)
Smith, C.A., Corripio, A.B.: Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control, 2nd edn., pp. 439–459. Wiley, New York (1997)
Cooper, D.J.: Practical Process Control using LOOP-PRO Software, pp. 160–192. Control Station Inc., USA (2005)
Ericks, K.T., Hedrick, J.L.: Enhancements of Single Loop Regulatory Control. Wiley, New York (1999)
Nandong, J.: Analytical tuning method for cascade control system via multi-scale control scheme. Int. J. Autom. Control. 10(2), 167–192 (2016)
Lee, Y., Oh, S., Park, S.: Enhanced control with a general cascade control structure. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 2679–2688 (2002)
SOLTEQ: Operating and maintenance manual – Process Control Simulator SE 201, Malaysia (2015)
Shah, A.K., Aniljumar, M., Parikh, N.N.: Performance analysis of IMC based PID controller tuning on approximated process model. Nirma Univ. J. Eng. Technol. 1(2), 51–54 (2010)
Ahmed, S., Huang, B., Shah, S.L.: Parameter and delay estimation of continuous-time models using a linear filter. J. Process Control 16(4), 323–331 (2006)
The Mathwork Inc.: Design optimization to meet step response requirements (GUI) (1997–2014). https://www.mathworks.com/help/sldo/gs/optimize-controller-parameters-to-meet-step-response-requirements-gui.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chew, I.M., Wong, F., Bono, A., Nandong, J., Wong, K.I. (2018). Improved Cascade Control Tuning for Temperature Control System. In: Alfred, R., Iida, H., Ag. Ibrahim, A., Lim, Y. (eds) Computational Science and Technology. ICCST 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 488. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8276-4_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8276-4_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8275-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8276-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)