Abstract
MOOCs have the potential to challenge existing educational models. Paradoxically, they frequently reinforce educational conventions by requiring the learners to conform to expected norms of current educational models. Recent research has produced data on how learners engage in MOOCs. And yet, despite the extensive data, rather than freeing learners to chart their own pathways, MOOCs still require the learners to conform to expected norms. The very act of learning autonomously often causes tensions, most noticeably when learners choose to drop out, rather than complete a course as expected, or when they engage in MOOCs as mere observers, rather than active contributors. In this chapter, we explore how the emphasis on the individual as active and autonomous learner sometimes conflicts with the expectation that learners conform to accepted norms. This expectation that learners conform to accepted ‘ways of being’ in a MOOC isolates those who plan their own pathway. The chapter concludes with a typology of different learners, arguing that, rather than adhering to a ‘type’, each MOOC participant moves across these learner types, depending on their motivations, and may span different types, rather than falling into one single category.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Todd Rose, The Myth of the Universal Learner Available from: https://www.vteducation.org/en/articles/collaborating-technology-and-active-learning/myth-universal-learner-todd-rose-variability.
References
Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Education Assessment Evaluation Association, 21, 33–46.
Billett, S., & Somerville, M. (2004). Transformation at work: Identity and learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 309–326.
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes Massive Open Online Courses and why? Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2350964.
Clow, D. (2013, April). MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 185–189). ACM.
Conole, G. (2013). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: Strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. RED - Revista de Educación a Distancia, 39. Available from: http://www.um.es/ead/red/39/conole.pdf.
Cottom, T. (2014). Democratising ideologies and inequality regimes. Cambridge, MA: Berkman Centre for Internet & Society Series, Harvard University.
Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., & Caballé, S. (2013, October). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. In 2013 Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC) (pp. 208–213). IEEE.
Davis, H., Dickens, K., Leon, M., del Mar Sanchez Ver, M., & White, S. (2014). MOOCs for Universities and Learners: An analysis of motivating factors. In: 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 01–03 April 2014.
DeBoer, J., Ho, A., Stump, G., & Breslow, L. (2014) Changing “course”: reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x14523038.
Feinberg, W. (2001). Choice, autonomy, need-definition and educational reform. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 20(5), 402–409.
Ferguson, R., & Sharples, M. (2014, September). Innovative pedagogy at massive scale: Teaching and learning in MOOCs. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 98–111). Cham: Springer.
Gillani, N., & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18–26.
Grossman, R. J. (2013). Are massive open online courses in your future? HR Magazine, 58(8), 30–36.
Guàrdia, L., Maina, M., & Sangrà, A. (2013). MOOC design principles: A pedagogical approach from the learner’s perspective. eLearning Papers, (33).
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.
Illeris, K. (2007). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in School and Beyond. London: Routledge.
Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3).
Kizilcec, R., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. LAK ’13 Leuven, Belgium.
Knox, J. (2016). Posthumanism and the massive open online course: Contaminating the subject of global education. Routledge.
LaRose, R., & Eastin, M. (2004). A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48(3), 358–377.
LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M. (2001). Understanding Internet usage: A social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 395–412.
LeBar, M. (2014) MOOCs—Completion is not important. Forbes. Available from August 20, 2017: http://www.forbes.com/sites/ccap/2014/09/16/moocs-finishing-is-not-the-important-part/.
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48.
Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015) Designing MOOCs for professional learners: Tools and patterns to encourage self-regulated learning, eLearning Papers, 42, Special Issue on Design Patterns for Open Online Teaching and Learning. Accessed August 20, 2017 from http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/en/node/170924.
Mak, J., Williams, S., & Mackness, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010.
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83.
McCathy, C. (2011). Afterword. In Peters and E. Bulut (Eds.), Cognitive capitatlism, education and digital labour (pp. 301–321). Berlin: Peter Lang.
Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113–121.
Milligan, C., Margaryan, A., & Littlejohn, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2). http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.htm.
Pintrich, P., & de Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
Reich, J. (2015). Rebooting MOOC research. Science, 347(6217), 34–35.
Rensfeldt, A. (2012). (Information) technologies of the self: Personalisation as a new model of subjectivation and knowledge production. E-Learning and Digital Media, 9(4), 406–418.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Scribner, S. (1985). Vygotsky’s uses of history. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology. London and New York: Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education. Cambridge, UK: Polity Books.
Shah, D. (2016). By the numbers: MOOCS in 2016. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2016/.
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. [Online]. Available from www.knowingknowledge.com.
Siemens, G. (2013). Massive open online courses: Innovation in education. Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice, 5, 5–15.
Wintrup, J., Wakefield, K., & Davis, H. (2015). Engaged learning in MOOCs: A study using a the UK engagement survey. The Higher Education Academy.
Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., & Rose, C. P. (2013). “Turn on, tune in, drop out”: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education (pp. 1–8). Retrieved from http://lytics.stanford.edu/datadriveneducation/papers/yangetal.pdf.
Zimmerman, B. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.
Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner, & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Vasudha Chaudhari of The Open University for comments and for proofing this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Littlejohn, A., Hood, N. (2018). The Emancipated Learner? The Tensions Facing Learners in Massive, Open Learning. In: Reconceptualising Learning in the Digital Age. SpringerBriefs in Education(). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8893-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8893-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8892-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8893-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)