Abstract
Australian historians have long placed the examination of historical evidence , scholarship and changing representations of the past at the centre of their teaching. This chapter reviews the history of Australian practice, foregrounds the innovative approaches of the New Left generation and contemplates recent challenges to prevailing methods, especially those driven by the changing university sector and the changing orientations of students. This chapter critically examines major responses to these challenges, particularly the increasing emphasis on ‘doing history’ in the classroom. It argues that ‘doing history’ activities must continue to connect scholarship , representation and evidence , and should not be limited to the exclusive analysis of primary evidence .
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Calder, L. (2006). Uncoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. Journal of American History, 92(4), 1358–1370. https://doi.org/10.2307/4485896.
Hughes-Warrington, M. (2015). Not going, not listening either: Lecture recording did not kill the live lecture. Retrieved October 11, 2016, from http://missunitwocents.tumblr.com/post/132791490035/not-going-not-listening-either-lecture-recording.
Lambert, C. (2012). Twilight of the lecture. Harvard Magazine, March-April 2012, pp. 23–27. Retrieved October 11, 2016, from http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/03/twilight-of-the-lecture.
Macintyre, S. (1994). A history for a nation: Ernest Scott and the making of Australian history. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
Macintyre, S., & Clark, A. (2003). The history wars. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
Sargent Wood, L. (2012). Hooked on inquiry: History labs in the methods course. The History Teacher, 45(4), 549–566.
Shoemaker, N. (2009). Where is the history lab course? Perspectives on History, January 2009, Retrieved October 3, 2016, from https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/january-2009/where-is-the-history-lab-course.
Sipress, J. M. (2004). Why students don’t get evidence and what we can do about it. The History Teacher, 37(3), 351–363.
Sipress, J. M., & Voelker, D. J. (2011). The end of the history survey course: The rise and fall of the coverage model. Journal of American History, 97(4), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaq035.
Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430–456.
Westhoff, L. M. (2012). Historiographic mapping: Towards a signature pedagogy for the methods course. Journal of American History, 98(4), 1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jar614.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scalmer, S. (2018). TLO 6: Examine Historical Evidence, Scholarship and Changing Representations of the Past. In: Clark, J., Nye, A. (eds) Teaching the Discipline of History in an Age of Standards. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0047-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0047-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0046-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0047-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)