Skip to main content

Perceived Resources and Technology Acceptance Model (PRATAM): Students’ Acceptance of e-Learning in Mathematics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2016)

Abstract

The methods of teaching in class are also affected with the rise of technology used in education. The lecturer or instructor may want to use innovative ways of teaching to capture the students’ attention and to make the learning process become more enjoyable and effective. Therefore, this study was carried out with the objective to identify the factors that influence students’ behaviour of adopting e-learning especially in the subject of mathematics based on Perceived Resources and Technology Acceptance Model (PRATAM). The technology used includes Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) and Learning Management System (LMS). Questionnaires were used to collect data from one hundred and nine precalculus students. Quantitative data were analyzed using structural equation modelling (SEM). Perceived resource has a positive direct effect on perceived ease of use, behavioural intention to use, attitude towards using and behavioural intention to use. Perceived ease of use will have a positive direct effect on perceived usefulness; attitude will have a positive direct effect on behavioural intention to use which will have positive direct effect on actual system use. Perceived resource is the most significant factor for students’ acceptance of e-learning in mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Awang Z (2014) A handbook on SEM for academicians and practitioners. The step by step practical guides for the beginners. MPWS Rich Resources

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah N, Ujang S, Samsudin S, Mohamed N (2016) Blended learning: readiness study among mathematics and statistics lecturer in UiTM Cawangan Pahang, manuscript accepted for publication in BMCRC

    Google Scholar 

  • Borba MC, Askar P, Engelbrecht J, Gadanidis G, Llinares S, Aguilar MS (2016) Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 48:589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng HK (2009) Extending the technology acceptance model using perceived user resources in higher education web-based online learning courses. Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3):319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endut NA, Mohd Isa P, Abdul Aziz SR, Hasrol MNH, Abdul Aziz A (2012) R-learning for Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia (UiTM): campus wide implementation and accomplishment. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 67:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathema N, Shannon D, Ross M (2015) Expanding the technology acceptance model (TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management system (LMSS) in higher education institutions. J Online Learn Teach 11(2):210–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis G (2013) Designing a mathematics-for-All MOOC. In: Bastiaens T, Marks G (eds) Proceedings of e-learn, vol 2013. pp 704–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan H, Hassan F, Dahalan N, Zakaria Z, Wan Mohd Nor WA (2012) Evaluating mathematics e-learning materials: do evaluators agree with distance learners? Procedia Soc Behav Sci 67:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose LG, Gabriel AV, Pedro RC (2014) Technology integration into mathematics education and applications. J Symbolic Comput 61(62):66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2013.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieson K, Peacock E, Chin WW (2001) Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. ACM SIGMIS Database 32(3):86–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norngainy MT, Nur Arzilah I, Izamarlina A, Haliza O, Zulkifli MN, Azami Z (2012) Learning process in mathematics and statistics courses towards engineering students: e-learning or traditional method? Asian Soc Sci 8(16):128

    Google Scholar 

  • Park SY (2009) An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educ Technol Soc 12(3):150–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Priyanka S (2012) Technology acceptance model: a survey of literature. Int J Bus Soc Res (IJBSR) 2(4):175–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Seda G (2014) A WebQuest example for mathematics education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 116:2175–2179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeda AM, Shiratuddin MF, Kok WW (2015) Factors affecting the e-book adoption amongst mathematics and statistics students at universities in Libya: a structural equation modelling approach. Int J e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learn 5(4):237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soper DS (2017) A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [software]. Available from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc

  • Surendran P (2012) Technology acceptance model: a survey of literature. Int J Bus Soc Res (IJBSR) 2(4):175–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett HG (2002) Not one or the other but both: hybrid course delivery using WebCT. Eletronic Libr 20(5):413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Institute of Research Management and Innovation (IRMI) under Research Grant iRAGS, Universiti Teknologi MARA. Special thanks to the Administration Department of Universiti Teknologi MARA for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salimah Ahmad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tarmuji, N.H., Ahmad, S., Abdullah, N.H.M., Nassir, A.A., Idris, A.S. (2019). Perceived Resources and Technology Acceptance Model (PRATAM): Students’ Acceptance of e-Learning in Mathematics. In: Mohamad Noor, M., Ahmad, B., Ismail, M., Hashim, H., Abdullah Baharum, M. (eds) Proceedings of the Regional Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (RCSTSS 2016) . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0203-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0203-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0202-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0203-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics