Skip to main content

Banking Competition and Banking Stability in SEM Countries: The Causal Nexus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Analytics and Applications

Abstract

The study tries to evaluate whether banking competition impacts the banking stability in the case of 32 Single European Market countries, and whether a guiding principle focus on banking competition is appropriate as a loom to boost banking stability. This study finds the interactions between banking competition and banking stability in 32 European countries between 1996 and 2014 with a panel vector auto-regressive model. Our observed results show that there is a cointegrating relationship between the two. Moreover, banking competition is a causative factor in banking stability in the long run. Thus, a focus on banking competition will enhance the banking stability of these countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Theories of finance and economic growth nexus suggest that the financial purposes performed by banks (and other nonbanking financial intermediaries) are significant in encouraging economic growth (Levine 2005).

  2. 2.

    Competition has both positive and negative impact on banking stability. There exist two strands of literature which argue that competition in banking industry endangers financial stability. Increased competition in bank deposits wears away the profitability in the banking market and thus lowers the market power of banks, this is due to the increase in bank interest (see, for instance, Matutes and Vives 2000; Schaeck et al. 2009). Second, positive relationship exists between the two; competition created a number of benefits such as reducing liquidity and giving them in the form of bank loans to the public and sells securities to the investors. Less concentration in banking industry leads to good stability by diversifying both interest and noninterest income activities (Amidu and Wolfe 2013; Hellmann et al. 2000; Berger et al. 2009).

  3. 3.

    The SEM is meant for the benefit of all the European Union (EU) countries. Its mainstreams are the “four freedoms”: free movement of people, goods, services, and capital between all the EU member countries. These can be enjoyed, with limited exemptions, by everyone living and working in the EU.

  4. 4.

    Under different conditions of bank reforms in the host country, the degree of relationship between the two (banking stability and banking competition) varies.

  5. 5.

    Competition-fragility view (Marcus 1984; Keeley 1990; Hellmann et al. 2000) and competition-stability view (Boyd and De Nicolo 2005).

  6. 6.

    The panels used in this study are unbalanced due to data unavailability for some of these countries over the complete sample period.

  7. 7.

    European Single Market Countries (see, for instance, Jayakumar et al. 2018). It can be noted that some of these countries are transcontinental.

  8. 8.

    Some of these measures of banking competition have been used previously. (See, for instance, by Hamada et al. (2017), Fernandez et al. (2016), Kasman and Kasman (2015), Hakam et al. (2013), Bikker et al. (2007), Turk-Ariss (2009), and Boone (2008).)

  9. 9.

    Some of these measures of banking stability have been used previously, for example, by Carretta et al. (2015), Creel et al. (2015), Kasman and Kasman (2015), Tabak et al. (2012), Berger et al. (2009), Cihak and Hesse (2010), and Chang et al. (2008).

  10. 10.

    AIC-Akaike information criterion. A suitable statistical technique to fix optimum lag length (Brooks 2014).

  11. 11.

    See Maeso-Fernandez et al. (2006) and Pedroni (2001) for more details on FMOLS.

  12. 12.

    See Kao and Chiang (2000) for detailed description on DOLS.

  13. 13.

    The results are consistent with the findings of Fiordelisi and Mare (2014), Fu et al. (2014), Jeon and Lim (2013), Amidu and Wolfe (2013), Berger et al. (2009), and Allen and Gale (2004).

  14. 14.

    As it is apparent and is true in a most of the cases that we consider.

  15. 15.

    This is line with the study of Jayakumar et al. (2018).

  16. 16.

    To promote the banking stability in the economy, the banking authority should implement better policies and reforms supporting the banking competition in the market in a well-refined form.

  17. 17.

    It is widely regarded that a good banking system is as an important drivers of economic growth; while any failure in the banking system will have direct negative effect on any country’s economy (see, inter alia, Louzis et al. 2012; Dell’ Ariccia et al. 2008; Hogart et al. 2002; Levine and Zervous 1998).

  18. 18.

    See Jayakumar et al. (2018) for more details.

References

  • Adjei-Frimpong, K. (2013). Efficiency and competition in the Ghanaian banking industry: A panel granger causality approach. Annals of Financial Economics, 8(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2004). Competition and financial stability. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(3), 453–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Yousif, Y. K. (2002). Financial development and economic growth: Another look at the evidence from developing countries. Review of Financial Economics, 11(2), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amidu, M., & Wolfe, S. (2013). Does bank competition and diversification lead to greater stability? Evidence from emerging markets. Review of Development Finance, 3(3), 152–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrievskaya, I., & Semenova, M. (2016). Does banking system transparency enhance bank competition? Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Stability, 23, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2006). Bank concentration, competition, and crises: First results. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(5), 1581–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Klapper, L. F., & Turk-Ariss, R. (2009). Bank competition and financial stability. Journal of Financial Services Research, 35(2), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikker, J. A., Spierdijk, L., & Finnie, P. (2007). Market structure, contestability and institutional environment: The determinants of banking competition. DNB Working Paper, no. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, J. (2008). A new way to measure competition. Economic Journal, 118, 1245–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, H., & Nicolo, G. (2005). The theory of bank risk taking and competition revisited. Journal of Finance, 3, 1329–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2014). Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caminal, R., & Matutes, C. (2002). Market power and banking failures. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 1341–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carby, Y., Craigwell, R., Wright, A., & Wood, A. (2012). Finance and growth causality: A test of the Patrick’s stage-of-development hypothesis. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(21), 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carretta, A., Farina, V., Fiordelisi, F., Schwizer, P., & Lopes, F. S. S. (2015). Don’t stand so close to me: The role of supervisory style in banking stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 52, 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetorelli, N., & Gambera, M. (2001). Banking market structure, financial dependence and growth: International evidence from industry data. The Journal of Finance, 56(2), 617–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. J., Guerra, S. M., Lima, E. J. A., & Tabak, B. M. (2008). The stability-concentration relationship in the Brazilian banking system. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(4), 388–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. T. (2006). Role of non-performing loans (NPLs) and capital adequacy in banking structure and competition. University of Bath School of Management Working Paper, no. 2006.16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihak, M., & Hesse, H. (2010). Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Services Research, 38(2/3), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2003). Financial development, property rights and growth. Journal of Finance, 58(6), 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coccorese, P. (2008). Bank competition and regional differences. Economics Letters, 101(1), 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creel, J., Hubert, P., & Labondance, F. (2015). Financial stability and economic performance. Economic, 48, 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Guevara, F. H., & Maudos, J. (2011). Banking competition and economic growth: cross-country evidence. The European Journal of Finance, 17(8), 739–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Ariccia, G., Detragiache, E., & Rajan, R. (2008). The real effect of banking crises. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17(1), 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, A., González, A., & Suarez, N. (2016). Banking stability, competition, and economic volatility. Journal of Financial Stability, 22, 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, C. (2013). Bank market concentration and bank efficiency in the European Union: A panel Granger causality approach. International Economics and Economic Policy, 10(3), 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiordelisi, F., & Mare, D. S. (2014). Competition and financial stability in European cooperative banks. Journal of International Money and Finance, 45, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X., Lin, Y., Molyneux, P. (2014). Bank competition and financial stability in Asia Pacific. Journal of Banking & Finance, 38, 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffeo, E., & Mazzocchi, R. (2014). Competition in the banking sector and economic growth: Panel-based international evidence. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2416379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakam, A., Fatine, F. A., & Zakaria, F. (2013). Determinants of banking competition in Morocco and evaluation of the structural reforms. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(2), 447–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakenes, H., & Schnabel, I. (2011). Capital regulation, bank competition, and financial stability. Economics Letters, 113(3), 256–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamada, K., Kaneko, A., & Yanagihara, M. (2017). Oligopolistic competition in the banking market and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 68(C), 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T. F., Murdock, K. C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Liberalization, moral hazard in banking, and prudential regulation: Are capital requirements enough. American Economic Review, 90(1), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogart, G., Reis, R., & Saporta, V. (2002). Costs of banking system instability: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26, 825–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James H. C., Gwatidzo, T., & Ntuli, M. (2013). Investigating the effect of bank competition on financial stability in ten African countries. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 12(7), 755–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar, M., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Maradana, R. P. & Gaurav, K. (2018). Banking competition, banking stability, and economic growth: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of Economics and Business, 96, 15–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, J. Q., & Lim, K. K. (2013). Bank competition and financial stability: A comparison of commercial banks and mutual savings banks in Korea. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 25, 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokipii, T., & Monnin, P. (2013). The impact of banking sector stability on the real economy. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (2000). On the estimation and inference of a co-integrated regression in panel data. In B. H. Baltagi (ed.), Advances in econometrics: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration and dynamic panels, Vol. 15, pp. 179–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasman, A., & Carvallo, O. (2014). Financial stability, competition and efficiency in Latin American and Caribbean banking. Journal of Applied Economics, 17(2), 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasman, S., & Kasman, A. (2015). Bank competition concentration and financial stability in the Turkish banking industry. Economic Systems, 39(3), 502–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, M. C. (1990). Deposit insurance, risk and market power in banking. American Economic Review, 80(5), 1183–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Hsieh, M. (2014). Bank reforms, foreign ownership, and financial stability. Journal of International Money and Finance, 40(3), 204–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (2003). More on finance and growth: More finance, more growth? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 85(6), 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (2005). Finance and growth: Theory and evidence. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R., & Zervos, S. (1998). Stocks market and economic growth. American Economic Review, 88(3), 537–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Molyneux, P., Wilson, J., & John, O. S. (2013). Competition and stability in European banking: A regional analysis* competition and stability in European banking: A regional analysis. Academic Journal, Manchester School., 81(2), 176–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., & Metaxas, V. L. (2012). Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36, 1012–1027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeso-Fernandez, F., Osbat, C., & Schnatz, B. (2006). Towards the estimation of equilibrium exchange rates for CEE acceding countries: Methodological issues and a panel cointegration perspective. Journal of Computational Economics, 34(3), 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. J. (1984). Deregulation and bank financial policy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 8(4), 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Miera, D., & Repullo, R. (2010). Does competition reduce the risk of bank failure? Review of Financial Studies, 23(10), 3638–3664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matutes, C., & Vives, X. (2000). Imperfect competition, risk taking, and regulation in banking. European Economic Review, 44, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishkin, F. S. (1999). Financial consolidation: Dangers and opportunities. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23, 675–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchener, K. J., & Wheelock, D. C. (2013). Does the structure of banking markets affect economic growth? Evidence from U.S. state banking markets. Explorations in Economic History, 50, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngare, E., Nyamongo, M. M., & Misati, R. N. (2014). Stock market development and economic growth in Africa. Journal of Economics and Business, 74, 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu, E. L., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2014). Financial liberalisation and economic growth in Nigeria: An ARDL-bounds testing approach. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(2), 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H. T. (1966). Financial development and economic growth in underdeveloped countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 14(2), 174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15(1), 93–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 727–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M., & Shin, Y. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58(1), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, B. M., Norman, N. R., & Nishigaki, Y. (2014). Does banking sector development affect economic growth and inflation? A panel co-integration and causality approach. Applied Financial Economics, 24(7), 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., & Bahmani, S. (2015). Causal Nexus between economic growth, inflation, and stock market development: The case of OECD countries. Global Finance Journal, 27, 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeck, K., Cihak, M. & Wolfe, S. (2009). Are competitive banking systems more stable? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(4), 712–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serwa, D. (2010). Larger crises cost more: Impact of banking sector instability on output growth. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(8), 1463–1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soedarmono, W., Machrouh, F., & Tarazi, A. (2011). Bank market power, economic growth and financial stability: Evidence from Asian banks. Journal of Asian Economic, 22, 460–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabak, B., Fazio, D., & Cajueiro, D. (2012). The relationship between banking market competition and risk-taking: Do size and capitalization matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3366–3381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titko, J., Skvarciany, V., & Jurevičienė, D. (2015). Drivers of bank profitability: Case of Latvia and Lithuania. Intellectual Economics, 9(2), 120–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk-Ariss, R. (2009). Competitive behaviour in middle East and North Africa banking systems. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vives, X. (2016). Competition and stability in banking: The role of competition policy and regulation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolde-Rufael, Y. (2009). Re-examining the financial development and economic growth Nexus in Kenya. Economic Modelling, 26(6), 1140–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeyati, E. L., & Micco, A. (2007). Concentration and foreign penetration in Latin American banking sectors: Impact on competition and risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 1633–1647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to anonymous reviewers and session chair (5th IIMA International Conference of Advanced Data Analysis, Business Analytics, and Intelligence (ICADABAI), April 8–9, 2017) for detailed suggestions that significantly improved the paper. We are also grateful to Professor Arnab K. Laha (the conference convenor, ICADABAI) for his valuable direction and kind support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudra P. Pradhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1: Description of Variables

Table 6 Definition of variables

Appendix 2: Devising of Composite Index of Financial Stability by Using PCA

The study constructs a composite index of financial stability (CBS) using principal component analysis (PCA). We deploy the subsequent steps to obtain the CBS: (a) data are arranged in order to create an input matrix for principal components (PCs), subsequently the matrix is normalized, based on the min-max criteria; (b) expending PCA, eigenvalues, factor loadings, and PCs are derived; and (c) PCs are used to construct the “CBS” for each country and for each year. The detailed discussion of these stepsFootnote 18 is not available here due to conserve space.

To have the “CBS”, combination of few important variables relating to banking stability was utilized. The following four variables are used for CBS: bank capitalization (BCA), private credit by deposit money banks (PCD), performing loan assets (PLA), and return on assets (ROA). These four indicators are selected to calculate CBS, as they have a common unit of measurement, i.e., in percentage. Table 7 offers the statistical analysis of PCA.

Table 7 Instantaneous of PCA-related information for composite index of banking stability

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jayakumar, M., Pradhan, R.P., Chatterjee, D., Sarangi, A.K., Dash, S. (2019). Banking Competition and Banking Stability in SEM Countries: The Causal Nexus. In: Laha, A. (eds) Advances in Analytics and Applications. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1208-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics