Abstract
This chapter describes the five individual models of school-based practice involving university–school partnerships, each presented as a single case study. Each partnership was independently developed, and there are both common and unique characteristics of the partnership and the pedagogical practices that emerge when a cross-case analysis is conducted. This variety illustrates that there is not one way to work in partnerships in teacher education. Each case study is presented including a set of pedagogical principles that are common across the case studies, and set of themes are developed that are further explored in Part 2 of this book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Academy of Science. (2015). Primary connections. Accessed from https://www.science.org.au/learning/schools/primary-connections.
Campbell, C. (2000). Science Education in a State of Change, Ph.D. Thesis, Deakin Library.
Campbell, C., & Chittleborough, G. (2014). The new science Specialist: Promoting and improving the teaching of science in primary schools. Teaching Science, the Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association., 1, 19–29.
Grindrod, A., Klindworth, A., Martin, M.-D., & Tytler, R. (1991). A survey of pre-service primary teachers’ experiences of science in schools. Research in Science, 21, 151–160.
Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461757.
Kenny, J. D. (2010). Preparing primary teachers to teach science: A partnership based approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1267–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902977994.
Kenny, J., Hobbs, L., Speldewinde, C., Jones, M., Campbell C., Gilbert, A., et al. (2016). Establishing school university partnerships to teach science—does what worked for us work for you? In Proceedings of ESERA 2015—Science Education Research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future, 31 August–4 September, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 2029–2040. ISBN 978-951-51-1541-6.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedigogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1301–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187009.
Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage publications Inc.
Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG) Report. (2015). https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/action_now_classroom_ready_teachers_accessible.pdf Accessed December 2016.
Watson, L., Woolnough, J., Hay, I., Hellyer, L., & Stuckey, D. (2013). Challenging the theory/practice divide in higher education: The teaching clinics model of work-integrated learning. In K. Goodenough G. Galway C. Badenhorst & R. Kelly (Eds.), Inspiration and innovation in teaching and teacher education. Plymouth U.K: Lexington Books.
Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campbell, C. et al. (2018). Models of School-Based Practice: Partnerships in Practice. In: Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Jones, M. (eds) School-based Partnerships in Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1795-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1795-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1794-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1795-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)