Abstract
In any research community the word “Journal” refers to record of a serious, scholarly publication of the findings which are most often peer-reviewed. Journals, nowadays, exist in print and in online (Web-based) formats. These voluminous scientific records called “Journals” are mostly used by research scholars (Ph.D. students)/postgraduate students and nowadays even by undergraduate students in engineering with a sole view to get his/her findings validated by experts in that field of research and consequently share it with the scientific community through publications in a relevant Journal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Journal Impact Factor. (2004). A critical review, Tommy Boone, professionalization of exercise physiology online, Vol. 7, No. 1.
Ranade, S., & Kumar, N. (2008). Journal impact factors essential primary quality indicators surely not so!!. Current Science, 94(4), 425–426.
Chakrabarti, B. (2008). Expectations from a Ph.D. degree. Current Science, 94(4), 425–425.
Misteli, T. (2013). Eliminating the impact of the impact factor. The Journal of Cell Biology, 201(5), 651–652.
Dey, B., Mehedi, J., & Dey, R. (2013). Assessment of Ph.D. (Technology) quality in Indian universities: AHP based decision model. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE).
Gupta, B. M., & Dhawan, S. M. (2006). Measures of progress of science in India (an analysis of the publication output in science and technology)—Report by Technology and Development Studies (NISTADS), Government of India: National Institute of Science.
http://www.booz.com/media/uploads/NASSCOM_Booz_ESR_Report_2010.pdf.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2010/tc2010128_116888.htm.
Goel, S. Is Today’s Ph.D. education in India aiming to create inspiring intellectual leaders of tomorrow, http://www.indiaeducationreview.com/article/todayE28099s-phd-education-india-aiming-create-inspiring-intellectual-leaders-tomorrow.
Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). The Ph.D. factory. Nature, 472.
Kumar, M. J. (2009). Evaluating scientists: Citations, impact factor, h-index, online page hits and what else. IETE Technical Review, 26(3), 165.
Regulations for Doctor of Philosophy—R 2010, Anna University, Chennai, 2012
Ph.D. regulations, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India, 2012
Ph.D. ordinance and regulations, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam, India, 2012
UGC regulations on minimum standards and procedure for the award of M.Phil/Ph.D. degree, regulations 2009 and clarification on guidelines for admission in Ph.D., The Gazette of India, 2011.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Deb, D., Dey, R., Balas, V.E. (2019). Bibliometrics and Research Quality. In: Engineering Research Methodology. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 153. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2947-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2947-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2946-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2947-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)