Skip to main content

Bibliometrics and Research Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering Research Methodology

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 153))

Abstract

In any research community the word “Journal” refers to record of a serious, scholarly publication of the findings which are most often peer-reviewed. Journals, nowadays, exist in print and in online (Web-based) formats. These voluminous scientific records called “Journals” are mostly used by research scholars (Ph.D. students)/postgraduate students and nowadays even by undergraduate students in engineering with a sole view to get his/her findings validated by experts in that field of research and consequently share it with the scientific community through publications in a relevant Journal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://clarivate.com/essays/impact-factor/.

References

  1. Journal Impact Factor. (2004). A critical review, Tommy Boone, professionalization of exercise physiology online, Vol. 7, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ranade, S., & Kumar, N. (2008). Journal impact factors essential primary quality indicators surely not so!!. Current Science, 94(4), 425–426.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chakrabarti, B. (2008). Expectations from a Ph.D. degree. Current Science, 94(4), 425–425.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Misteli, T. (2013). Eliminating the impact of the impact factor. The Journal of Cell Biology, 201(5), 651–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dey, B., Mehedi, J., & Dey, R. (2013). Assessment of Ph.D. (Technology) quality in Indian universities: AHP based decision model. In Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, B. M., & Dhawan, S. M. (2006). Measures of progress of science in India (an analysis of the publication output in science and technology)—Report by Technology and Development Studies (NISTADS), Government of India: National Institute of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.booz.com/media/uploads/NASSCOM_Booz_ESR_Report_2010.pdf.

  8. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2010/tc2010128_116888.htm.

  9. Goel, S. Is Today’s Ph.D. education in India aiming to create inspiring intellectual leaders of tomorrow, http://www.indiaeducationreview.com/article/todayE28099s-phd-education-india-aiming-create-inspiring-intellectual-leaders-tomorrow.

  10. Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). The Ph.D. factory. Nature, 472.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, M. J. (2009). Evaluating scientists: Citations, impact factor, h-index, online page hits and what else. IETE Technical Review, 26(3), 165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Regulations for Doctor of Philosophy—R 2010, Anna University, Chennai, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ph.D. regulations, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ph.D. ordinance and regulations, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, Assam, India, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  15. UGC regulations on minimum standards and procedure for the award of M.Phil/Ph.D. degree, regulations 2009 and clarification on guidelines for admission in Ph.D., The Gazette of India, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipankar Deb .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Deb, D., Dey, R., Balas, V.E. (2019). Bibliometrics and Research Quality. In: Engineering Research Methodology. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 153. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2947-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2947-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2946-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2947-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics