Abstract
This chapter aims to increase awareness related to the assessment of embodied greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) of the built environment in Australia—a critical step to achieve meaningful emissions reduction. A summary of existing methods, data, tools, guidance and gaps in quantifying embodied GHGE in the Australian built environment is provided. A quick evaluation of embodied GHGE is an important aid for the design decision-making process within the architecture, engineering and construction industries. The newly developed Embodied Carbon Explorer (ECE) online tool is introduced to rapidly assess embodied GHGE for built environment projects with National Carbon Offset Standard-performance objectives. A case study using the ECE tool is described that quantifies the total carbon footprint of Australia’s construction industry and identifies the main contributors of embodied GHGE.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABS 2010, Australian statistical geography standard: design of the statistical areas level 2, ABS cat. no. 8731.0, Australian Bureau of Statstics, Canberra, Australia.
ABS 2012, Australian national accounts, input–output tables, 2008–09, ABS cat. no. 5209.0.55.001, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia, <www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/5209.0.55.001Main+Features12008-09?OpenDocument>.
ABS 2018, Australian national accounts, input–output tables, 2015–16, ABS cat. no. 5209.0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia.
Ai Group 2015, Australia’s construction industry: profile and outlook, Ai Group, Australia, <http://cdn.aigroup.com.au/Economic_Indicators/Construction_Survey/2015/Construction_industry_profile_and_Outlook.pdf>.
Alcorn, A 2003, Embodied Energy and CO2 Coefficients for New Zealand Building Materials, Centre for Building Performance Research, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.
Ariyaratne, CI & Moncaster, AM 2014, ‘Stand-alone calculation tools are not the answer to embodied carbon assessment’, Energy Procedia, vol. 62, pp. 150–159.
ASBP 2014, Embodied Carbon Industry task force recommendations, The Alliance for Sustainable Building Products, London, <https://asbp.org.uk/resource-report/embodied-carbon-industry-task-force-recommendations>.
Birgisdottir, H, Moncaster, A, Wiberg, AH, Chae, C, Yokoyama, K, Balouktsi, M et al. 2017, IEA EBC Annex 57, ‘Evaluation of embodied energy and CO2 eq for building construction’, Energy and Buildings, vol. 154, pp. 72–80.
Commonwealth of Australia 2017a, National carbon offset standard for buildings, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia, <http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/88f3280a-ebc9-47f3-8f28-7537dafd7056/files/ncos-buildings.pdf>.
Commonwealth of Australia 2017b, National carbon offset standard for precincts, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia, <http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/91aadf60-1454-4cde-81dd-587df7cdadd7/files/ncos-precincts.pdf>.
Crawford, RH 2008, ‘Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method’, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 88, no. 3, 496–506.
Crawford, RH 2011, Life cycle assessment in the built environment, Routledge, Florence, USA.
Crawford, RH 2018, Database of environmental flow coefficients for construction materials, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, https://doi.org/10.26188/5b7c83f3dc239.
Crawford, RH, Treloar, GJ 2010, Database of Embodied Energy and Water Values for Materials, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, https://doi.org/10.4225/49/588eeeeda28af.
Crawford, RH, Bontinck, P-A, Stephan, A, Wiedmann, T & Yu, M 2018, ‘Hybrid life cycle inventory methods—a review’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 172, pp. 1273–1288.
Department of the Environment and Energy 2018, National inventory report 2016, Australian national greenhouse accounts, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, <http://www.environment.gov.au/climate-change/climate-science-data/greenhouse-gas-measurement/publications/national-inventory-report-2016>.
Dixit, MK, Culp, CH & Fernandez-Solis, J 2015, ‘Embodied energy of construction materials: integrating human and capital energy into an IO-based hybrid model’, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 1936–1945.
Dixit, MK, Fernández-Solís, JL, Lavy, S & Culp, CH 2010, ‘Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: a literature review’, Energy and Buildings, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1238–1247.
Dixit, MK, Fernández-Solís, JL, Lavy, S & Culp, CH 2012, ‘Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: a review paper’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 3730–3743.
Foran, B, Lenzen, M & Dey, C 2005, Balancing Act—a Triple Bottom Line Account of the Australian Economy, CSIRO Resource Futures and The University of Sydney, Canberra, <https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/pub?pid=procite:ef189bac-499a-46db-be4d-b391a3cb05dc>.
Fouché, M & Crawford, RH 2015, ‘The Australian construction industry’s approach to embodied carbon assessment: a scoping study’, Living and Learning: Research for a Better Built Environment, 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association, Melbourne, 2–4 December, pp. 578–587.
Giesekam, J, Barrett, JR & Taylor, P 2015, ‘Construction sector views on low-carbon building materials’, Building Research & Information, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1–23.
Hegner, S 2007, ‘Embodied energy for energy efficiency measures, an assessment of embodied energy’s relevance for energy saving in the Swiss residential building sector’, Diploma thesis, Department of Environment Science, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ibn-Mohammed, T, Greenough, R, Taylor, S, Ozawa-Meida, L & Acquaye, A 2013, ‘Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—a review of current trends’, Energy and Buildings, vol. 66, no. 0, pp. 232–245.
IEA 2016, Evaluation of embodied energy and CO2 eq for building construction (Annex 57), subtask 1: basics, actors and concepts, Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation, Tokyo, Japan, <http://www.annex57.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ST1-Report.pdf>.
IPCC 2014, Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, <https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_frontmatter.pdf>.
Langston, YL & Langston, CA 2008, ‘Reliability of building embodied energy modelling: an analysis of 30 Melbourne case studies’, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 147–160.
Lawson, B 1996, Building Materials, Energy and the Environment: Towards Ecologically Sustainable Development, Royal Australian Institute of Architects, Red Hill, A.C.T.
Lenzen, M 2000, ‘Errors in conventional and input–output-based life-cycle inventories’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 127–148.
Lenzen, M, Moran, D, Kanemoto, K & Geschke, A 2013, ‘Building Eora: a global multi-regional input–output database at high country and sector resolution’, Economic Systems Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 20–49.
Lenzen, M, Geschke, A, Wiedmann, T, Lane, J, Anderson, N, Baynes, T et al. 2014, ‘Compiling and using input–output frameworks through collaborative virtual laboratories’, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 485–486, no. 0, pp. 241–251.
Lützkendorf, T, Foliente, G, Balouktsi, M & Wiberg, AH 2015, ‘Net-zero buildings: incorporating embodied impacts’, Building Research & Information, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 62–81.
Miller, D & Doh, J-H 2015, ‘Incorporating sustainable development principles into building design: a review from a structural perspective including case study’, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 421–439.
Miller, D, Doh, J-H, Panuwatwanich, K & Van Oers, N 2015, ‘The contribution of structural design to green building rating systems: an industry perspective and comparison of life cycle energy considerations’, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 16, no. 0, pp. 39–48.
Murray, J & Lenzen, M 2013, The sustainability practitioner’s guide to multi-regional input–output analysis, Common Ground, Champaign, Illinois.
NIST 2007, Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability Version 4.0, United States National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington.
Patchell, J 2018, ‘Can the implications of the GHG Protocol’s Scope 3 standard be realized?’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 185, pp. 941–958.
Schinabeck, J, Wiedmann, T & Lundie, S 2016, Assessing embodied carbon in the Australian built environment, Fifth Estate, viewed 26 April 2016, <http://www.thefifthestate.com.au/columns/spinifex/assessingembodied-carbon-in-the-australian-built-environment/81887>.
Schmidt, M & Crawford, RH 2018, ‘A framework for the integrated optimisation of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost of buildings’, Energy and Buildings, vol. 171, pp. 155–167.
Suh, S, Lenzen, M, Treloar, GJ, Hondo, H, Horvath, A, Huppes, G et al. 2004, ‘System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches’, Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 657–664.
Teh, SH 2018, Integrated carbon metrics and assessment for the built environment, PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney, https://doi.org/10.26190/5bc3c083d0433.
Teh, SH, Wiedmann, T, Schinabeck, J, Rowley, H & Moore, S 2015, ‘Integrated Carbon Metrics and Assessment for the Built Environment’, Procedia CIRP, vol. 29, pp. 480–485.
Teh, SH, Wiedmann, T, Castel, A & De Burgh, J. 2017a, ‘Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cement, Concrete and Geopolymer Concrete in Australia’, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 152, pp. 312–320.
Teh, SH, Wiedmann, T, Schinabeck, J & Moore, S 2017b, ‘Replacement scenarios for construction materials based on economy-wide hybrid LCA’, Procedia Engineering, vol. 180, pp. 179–189.
Teh, SH, Wiedmann, T & Moore, S 2018, ‘Mixed-unit hybrid life cycle assessment applied to the recycling of construction materials’, Journal of Economic Structures, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 13.
Treloar, GJ 1997, ‘Extracting embodied energy paths from input–output tables: towards an input–output-based hybrid energy analysis method’, Economic Systems Research, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 375–391.
UNEP 2009, Buildings and climate change: a summary for decision-makers, United Nations Environmental Programme, Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative, Paris, <https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/unep/document/buildings-and-climate-change-summary-decision-makers>.
University of Bath 2011, Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE) Version 2.0, Sustainable Energy Research Team (SERT), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath.
Walker-Morison, A, Grant, T & McAlister, S 2007, ‘The environmental impact of building materials’, Environment Design Guide, Acumen Practice Notes, Australian Institute of Architects, pp. 1–9.
Wiedmann, T, Chen, G & Barrett, J 2016, ‘The concept of city carbon maps: a case study of Melbourne, Australia’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 676–691.
Wu, H, Crawford, RH, Warren-Myers, G, Dave, M & Noguchi, M 2016, ‘The economic value of low-energy housing’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teh, S.H., Wiedmann, T., Crawford, R.H., Xing, K. (2019). Assessing Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Built Environment. In: Newton, P., Prasad, D., Sproul, A., White, S. (eds) Decarbonising the Built Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7940-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7940-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7939-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7940-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)