Skip to main content

Capturing the Multiplicities of Place: Neighbourhood and Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Placemaking Sandbox

Abstract

This chapter presents a critical examination of a Sandbox placemaking studio, which adopted a multimodal approach to placemaking pedagogy. Students engaged with a complex multicultural site across a number of different approaches and techniques while considering users who are typically marginalised in community participatory processes. Underpinned by Kolb’s experiential learning cycle, we discuss the unique insights that arose from several intersecting challenges: logistical challenges of implementing design interventions on-site in collaboration with local government, the conceptual and ethical challenges of working in a complex multicultural site, and finally the pedagogical challenges of teaching a group of students predominantly from non-English-speaking backgrounds. We conclude with recommendations for a critical (teaching) practice that can contribute towards capturing the multiplicity of place, be it neighbourhood or classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mahyar Arefi and Menelaos Triantafillou, “Reflections on the Pedagogy of Place in Planning and Urban Design,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 25, no. 1 (2005): 78.

  2. 2.

    Herbert J. Gans, “The Sociology of a Space: A Use-Centered View,” City & Community 1, no. 4 (2002): 329–339.

  3. 3.

    Zenia Kotval, “Teaching Experiential Learning in the Urban Planning Curriculum,” Journal of Geography in Higher Education 27, no. 3 (2003): 297–308.

  4. 4.

    Dorina Pojani, Laurel Johnson, Sébastien Darchen, and Katie Yang, “Learning by Doing: Employer Expectations of Planning Studio Education,” Urban Policy and Research 36, no. 1 (2018): 11–19.

  5. 5.

    Marilyn Higgins, Elizabeth Aitken-Rose, and Jennifer Dixon, “The Pedagogy of the Planning Studio: A View from Down Under,” Journal for Education in the Built Environment 4, no. 1 (2009): 8–30.

  6. 6.

    David H. Montross and Christopher J. Shinkman, Career Development: Theory and Practice (Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, 2008).

  7. 7.

    This is elaborated in chap. 2 of this book, “Head, Heart and Hands Model for Placemaking Learning: The Sandbox Studio Approach”.

  8. 8.

    Mateo-Babiano, Iderlina, and G. Lee. “People in Place: Placemaking Fundamentals.” in Placemaking Fundamentals for the Built Environment, eds. D. Hes and Hernandez-Santin. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, (2020): 15–38.

  9. 9.

    Summary—Greater Dandenong (C)—City of Greater Dandenong. 2019. Retrieved from https://www.communityprofile.com.au/greaterdandenong/.

  10. 10.

    Henri Lefebvre and Donald Nicholson-Smith, The Production of Space, Vol. 142 (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).

  11. 11.

    Jeffrey Hou, ed., Transcultural Cities: Border Crossing and Placemaking (Abington, UK: Routledge, 2013).

  12. 12.

    David A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press, 2014).

  13. 13.

    David Boud and Associates, Assessment 2020: Seven Propositions for Assessment Reform in Higher Education (Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council, 2010).

  14. 14.

    Herbert J. Gans, “The Sociology of a Space,” 329–339.

  15. 15.

    Kelum Palipane, “Multimodal Mapping—A Methodological Framework,” The Journal of Architecture 24, no. 1 (2019): 91–113.

  16. 16.

    Village Well, n.d. Our Story. Retrieved from http://www.villagewell.org/. Accessed 20/04/2019.

  17. 17.

    Kurt Iveson, Publics and the City, Vol. 80 (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2011).

  18. 18.

    Donald A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner (New York: Basic Books, 1983).

  19. 19.

    Kate Shaw, “The Place of Alternative Culture and the Politics of its Protection,” Planning Theory & Practice 6, no. 2 (2005): 149–169.

  20. 20.

    Heather Aslin and Valerie Brown, Towards Whole of Community Engagement: A Practical Toolkit (Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission, 2004).

  21. 21.

    Nancy Henkin, Corita Brown, and Sally Leiderman, Intergenerational Community Building: Lessons Learned (Philadelphia: The Intergenerational Community Building, 2012).

  22. 22.

    Martin Fuller and Ryan Moore, The Death and Life of Great American Cities (New York: Macat Library-Routledge, 2017).

  23. 23.

    Jane Jacobs, “Downtown is for People,” The Exploding Metropolis 146 (1958): 124–131.

  24. 24.

    Jan Gehl, Cities for People (Washington, DC, VA: Island Press, 2013).

  25. 25.

    Robina Mohammad, “Insiders’ and/or ‘Outsiders’: Positionality, Theory, and Praxis,” in Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers, eds. Melanie Limb and Clair Dwyer (London: Routledge, 2001), 101–117.

  26. 26.

    Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?”, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, eds. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg (Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1987), 67–111.

  27. 27.

    Leonie Sandercock and Rae Bridgman, “Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities,” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 8, no. 1 (1999): 108.

  28. 28.

    Ruth Fincher, Maree Pardy, and Kate Shaw, “Place-making or Place-Masking? The Everyday Political Economy of ‘Making Place’,” Planning Theory & Practice 17, no. 4 (2016): 516–536.

  29. 29.

    bell hooks, “Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom,” Journal of Leisure Research 28, no. 4 (1996): 40.

  30. 30.

    bell hooks, “Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom,” Journal of Leisure Research 28, no. 4 (1996).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iderlina Mateo-Babiano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mateo-Babiano, I., Palipane, K. (2020). Capturing the Multiplicities of Place: Neighbourhood and Classroom. In: Mateo-Babiano, I., Palipane, K. (eds) Placemaking Sandbox. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2752-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2752-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2751-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2752-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics