Skip to main content

Development of Design Heuristics for Furniture Design

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design for Tomorrow—Volume 3

Abstract

Innovation in design is positively influenced by the selection of successful concepts from the multiple and varied alternatives generated. Prior research explicated that design heuristics are the prompts, which allows novice designers to generate a number of alternatives and avoid design fixation. However, available design heuristics are industrial and product design specific. There are no heuristics available specific to furniture design. This paper presents the systematic development of design heuristics for furniture design (DHfFD), a concept generation tool for novice furniture designers. The tool has been developed from an analysis of the characteristics of 650 award-winning furniture (chair) designs and published compendium of well-known successful designs. This paper extends the research on the impact of DHfFD use by investigating the effectiveness of the tool through a pilot study. Initial testing has been done successfully with design students in the Department of Design, IIT Guwahati and has been enthusiastically adopted by students to create concepts that are more diverse. This study correlates DHfFD with more number of alternative concepts in furniture design. This research integrates evidence, methods, and perspectives from cognition and design correspondingly provide a pedagogical recommendation to use design heuristics for furniture design to overcome the issues in innovation in furniture design with the novice designers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Huber, D., Kaufmann, H., Steinmann, M.: Bridging the Innovation Gap. Springer International Publishing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perttula, M., Sipilä, P.: The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. J. Eng. Des. 18, 93–102 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600679679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brophy, D.R.: Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creat. Res. J. 13, 439–455 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, Y.C., Bligh, T., Chakrabarti, A.: Towards an “ideal” approach for concept generation. Des. Stud. 24, 341–355 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00003-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, M.C.: Concept generation and sketching: correlations with design outcome. Proc. ASME Des. Eng. Tech. Conf. 3, 829–834 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2003/dtm-48677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leahy, K., Seifert, C., Daly, S., McKilligan, S.: Overcoming design fixation in idea generation. DRS2018 Catal. 7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.349

  7. Simon, H.A., Newell, A.: Human problem solving: the state of the theory in 1970. Am. Psychol. 26, 145–159 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cross, N.: Expertise in design: an overview. Des. Stud. 25, 427–441 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Crilly, N.: Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers. Des. Stud. 38, 54–91 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Linsey, J.S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K.L., Schunn, C.: A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME. 132, 0410031–04100312 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, G.F.: Idea-generation techniques: a formulary of active ingredients. J. Creat. Behav. 32, 107–134 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daly, S.R., Christian, J.L., Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M., Gonzalez, R.: Teaching design ideation. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moreno, D.P., Yang, M.C., Hernández, A.A., Wood, K.L.: Creativity in transactional design problems: non-intuitive findings of an expert study using scamper. In: Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN. pp. 569–578 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yilmaz, S., Daly, S.R., Seifert, C.M., Gonzalez, R.: Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation. Des. Stud. 46, 95–124 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jansson, D.G., Smith, S.M.: Design fixation. Des. Stud. 12, 3–11 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Youmans, R.J., Arciszewski, T.: Design fixation: a cloak of many colors. Des. Comput. Cogn. 12. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_7

  17. Christensen, B.T., Schunn, C.D.: The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design. Mem. Cogn. 35, 29–38 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ball, L.J., Evans, J.S.B.T., Dennis, I.: Cognitive processes in engineering design: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408964950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Howard, T.J., Maier, A., Onarheim, B., Friis-Olivarius, M.: Overcoming design fixation through education and creativity methods. In: International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Purcell, A.T., Gero, J.S.: Design and other types of fixation. Des. Stud. 17, 363–383 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hinton, P.R.: Statistics Explained. Routledge, London and New York (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C., Daly, S.R., Gonzalez, R.: Design heuristics in innovative products. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032219

  23. Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M.: Creativity through design heuristics: a case study of expert product design. Des. Stud. 32, 384–415 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu, K.K., Yang, M.C., Wood, K.L.: Design principles: literature review, analysis, and future directions. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 138, 1–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. De Carvalho, M., Wei, T.-C., Savransky, S.D.: 121 Heuristics for Solving Problems. Lulu, Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tessari, R.K., De Carvalho, M.A.: Compilation of heuristics for inventive problem solving. Procedia Eng. 131, 50–70 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, C.L., Tan, S.T., Chan, K.W.: A qualitative and heuristic approach to the conceptual design of mechanisms. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 9, 17–32 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-1976(95)00060-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Koen, B.V.: Definition of the Engineering Method. American & Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Christian, J.L., Daly, S.R., Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C., Gonzalez, R.: Design heuristics support two modes of idea generation: initiating ideas and transitioning among concepts. ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yilmaz, S., Seifert, C.M., Gonzalez, R.: Cognitive heuristics in design: instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. AIEDAM 24, 335–355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060410000235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McFadzean, E.: The creativity continuum: towards a classification of creative problem solving techniques. Creat. Innov. Manage. 7, 131–139 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chu, Y., Li, Z., Su, Y., Pizlo, Z.: Heuristics in problem solving: the role of direction in controlling search space. J. Probl. Solving. 3 (2010). https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1078

  33. Eberle, B.: Scamper on: Games for Imagination Development. Prufrock Press Inc. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Altshuller, G.: 40 principles: TRIZ keys to innovation. Technical Innovation Center (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Roukes, N.: Design Synectics: Stimulating Creativity in Design. Davis Publications (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weaver, J., Wood, K., Crawford, R., Jensen, D.: Transformation design theory: a meta-analogical framework. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 10, 1–11 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3470028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh, V., Skiles, S.M., Krager, J.E., Wood, K.L., Jensen, D., Sierakowski, R.: Innovations in design through transformation: a fundamental study of transformation principles. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 131, 0810101–08101018 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3125205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hwang, D., Park, W.: Development of portability design heuristics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, pp. 81–90 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hwang, D., Park, W.: Design heuristics set for X: a design aid for assistive product concept generation. Des. Stud. 58, 89–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Saunders, M.N., Seepersad, C.C., Hölttä-Otto, K.: The characteristics of innovative, mechanical products. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 133 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003409

  41. Knauer, Roland: Transformation: Basic Principles and Methodology of Design. Birkhauser, Switzerland (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hannah, G.G.: Elements of design: Rowena Reed Kostellow and the structure of visual relationships (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kunifuji, S.: A Japanese problem solving approach: the KJ-Ho method. In: A., S. and J., K. (eds.) Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems: Recent Trends, Advances and Solutions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 333–338. Springer, Berlin (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19090-7_13

  44. Iba, T., Yoshikawa, A., Munakata, K.: Philosophy and Methodology of Clustering in Pattern Mining: Japanese Anthropologist Jiro Kawakita’ s KJ Method. Proc. 24th Conf. Pattern Lang. Programs. 1–11 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Supradip Das .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Das, S., Das, A.K. (2021). Development of Design Heuristics for Furniture Design. In: Chakrabarti, A., Poovaiah, R., Bokil, P., Kant, V. (eds) Design for Tomorrow—Volume 3. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 223. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0084-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0084-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0083-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0084-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics