Skip to main content

Good Laboratory Practices: Lab Orientations, Meetings, and Value of Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality Assurance Implementation in Research Labs

Abstract

Good laboratory practices (GLP) are a set of rules to ensure the quality of laboratory outcomes. It includes different parts among which orientations, communication, and meetings are of prime importance, because these can prepare a beginner to understand the workplace, and thus implement it throughout their academic journey. Executing a quality system in a basic research laboratory is a combative issue; however, considering its importance, it should be applied in all the laboratories in the world. This is a good way to promote the reproducibility and consistency of the data and hence help in training and educating new people to understand, communicate, and do the work in an ethical manner. The laboratories that implement GLP can easily establish the labs by making different plans to keep the students and labs organized. This is high time to implement the concept of GLP, including lab orientations, meetings, and effective communication methods, which can pave the best way to appreciate the scientific problems. Good communication and periodic meetings are a hallmark of the research endeavor. Information not only needs to flow in groups and the laboratories but must also be transferred in an easy-to-understand manner. This chapter summarizes the importance and different ways to instill orientation, communication habits, and meeting periodicity for a better output in research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen TJ, Fustfeld AR. Research laboratory architecture and the structuring of communications. R&D Manag. 1975;5(2):153–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. Good laboratory practice training manual: for the trainee: a tool for training and promoting good laboratory practice (GLP) concepts in disease endemic countries. World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wedlich RC, Pires A, Fazzino L, Fransen JM. Good laboratory practice. Part 3. Implementing good laboratory practice in the analytical lab. J Chem Educ. 2013;90(7):862–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Egbert MM. Scientists’ orientation to an experimental apparatus in their interaction in a chemistry lab. Issues Appl Linguist. 1991;2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. California Univ Berkeley Operations Research Center; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castells M. Communication power. Oxford: OUP; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Critical laboratory values communication: summary recommendations from available guidelines. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(20).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson DR, Chappell MF. Communication and representation as elements in mathematical literacy. Read Writ Q. 2007;23(2):179–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar S, Lata P. Communication skills. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doumont J-L. Creating effective presentation slides; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buckley K, Karr S, Nisly SA, Kelley K. Evaluation of a mock interview session on residency interview skills. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(4):511–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hinde RA. Non-verbal communication. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wharton T. Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Sless D. Learning and visual communication. London: Halsted; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller JG. Hedging the master schedule. In: Disaggregation. Springer; 1979. p. 237–56.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ketch A. Conversation: the comprehension connection. Read Teach. 2005;59(1):8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mudaly V, Singh K. Language: a barrier when teaching and learning business studies. Int J. 2018;74(9/1).

    Google Scholar 

  18. David Meier L. The Toyota way fieldbook. Tata McGraw-Hill; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ravn I, editor. Meetings in organizations: do they contribute to stakeholder value and personal meaning. In: Academy of management annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Müller R, Turner JR. The impact of principal–agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager. Int J Proj Manag. 2005;23(5):398–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kauffeld S, Lehmann-Willenbrock N. Meetings matter: effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Res. 2012;43(2):130–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Salmon P, Lush E, Jablonski M, Sephton SE. Yoga and mindfulness: clinical aspects of an ancient mind/body practice. Cogn Behav Pract. 2009;16(1):59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Conboy LA, Noggle JJ, Frey JL, Kudesia RS, Khalsa SBS. Qualitative evaluation of a high school yoga program: feasibility and perceived benefits. Explore. 2013;9(3):171–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neel Kamal Sharma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nadholta, P., Jyoti, S., Mohanty, S., Singh, A., Arya, J., Sharma, N.K. (2021). Good Laboratory Practices: Lab Orientations, Meetings, and Value of Communication. In: Anand, A. (eds) Quality Assurance Implementation in Research Labs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3074-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3074-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3073-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3074-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics