Abstract
Good laboratory practices (GLP) are a set of rules to ensure the quality of laboratory outcomes. It includes different parts among which orientations, communication, and meetings are of prime importance, because these can prepare a beginner to understand the workplace, and thus implement it throughout their academic journey. Executing a quality system in a basic research laboratory is a combative issue; however, considering its importance, it should be applied in all the laboratories in the world. This is a good way to promote the reproducibility and consistency of the data and hence help in training and educating new people to understand, communicate, and do the work in an ethical manner. The laboratories that implement GLP can easily establish the labs by making different plans to keep the students and labs organized. This is high time to implement the concept of GLP, including lab orientations, meetings, and effective communication methods, which can pave the best way to appreciate the scientific problems. Good communication and periodic meetings are a hallmark of the research endeavor. Information not only needs to flow in groups and the laboratories but must also be transferred in an easy-to-understand manner. This chapter summarizes the importance and different ways to instill orientation, communication habits, and meeting periodicity for a better output in research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen TJ, Fustfeld AR. Research laboratory architecture and the structuring of communications. R&D Manag. 1975;5(2):153–64.
World Health Organization. Good laboratory practice training manual: for the trainee: a tool for training and promoting good laboratory practice (GLP) concepts in disease endemic countries. World Health Organization; 2010.
Wedlich RC, Pires A, Fazzino L, Fransen JM. Good laboratory practice. Part 3. Implementing good laboratory practice in the analytical lab. J Chem Educ. 2013;90(7):862–5.
Egbert MM. Scientists’ orientation to an experimental apparatus in their interaction in a chemistry lab. Issues Appl Linguist. 1991;2(2).
Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. California Univ Berkeley Operations Research Center; 1980.
Castells M. Communication power. Oxford: OUP; 2013.
Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Critical laboratory values communication: summary recommendations from available guidelines. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(20).
Thompson DR, Chappell MF. Communication and representation as elements in mathematical literacy. Read Writ Q. 2007;23(2):179–96.
Kumar S, Lata P. Communication skills. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Doumont J-L. Creating effective presentation slides; 2007.
Buckley K, Karr S, Nisly SA, Kelley K. Evaluation of a mock interview session on residency interview skills. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(4):511–6.
Hinde RA. Non-verbal communication. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1972.
Wharton T. Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
Sless D. Learning and visual communication. London: Halsted; 1981.
Miller JG. Hedging the master schedule. In: Disaggregation. Springer; 1979. p. 237–56.
Ketch A. Conversation: the comprehension connection. Read Teach. 2005;59(1):8–13.
Mudaly V, Singh K. Language: a barrier when teaching and learning business studies. Int J. 2018;74(9/1).
David Meier L. The Toyota way fieldbook. Tata McGraw-Hill; 2005.
Ravn I, editor. Meetings in organizations: do they contribute to stakeholder value and personal meaning. In: Academy of management annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA; 2007.
Müller R, Turner JR. The impact of principal–agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager. Int J Proj Manag. 2005;23(5):398–403.
Kauffeld S, Lehmann-Willenbrock N. Meetings matter: effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Res. 2012;43(2):130–58.
Salmon P, Lush E, Jablonski M, Sephton SE. Yoga and mindfulness: clinical aspects of an ancient mind/body practice. Cogn Behav Pract. 2009;16(1):59–72.
Conboy LA, Noggle JJ, Frey JL, Kudesia RS, Khalsa SBS. Qualitative evaluation of a high school yoga program: feasibility and perceived benefits. Explore. 2013;9(3):171–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nadholta, P., Jyoti, S., Mohanty, S., Singh, A., Arya, J., Sharma, N.K. (2021). Good Laboratory Practices: Lab Orientations, Meetings, and Value of Communication. In: Anand, A. (eds) Quality Assurance Implementation in Research Labs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3074-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3074-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3073-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3074-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)