Skip to main content

Fog Computing in Industry 4.0: Applications and Challenges—A Research Roadmap

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Conservation Solutions for Fog-Edge Computing Paradigms

Abstract

Expeditious technical developments have remodeled the industrial sector. These developments vary from mechanization of industrial tasks to autonomous industrial processes in which no human intervention is needed for regular working. An advanced concept i.e. Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) evolved with the appliance of Internet of Things (IoT) in industrial processes; gave a new dimension to the technological advancements in the industrial sector by facilitating industrial processes with the support of Internet. Impeding the interpretation of IIoT to the production process supported another sub-domain of IoT, recognized as Industry 4.0. The concept of Industry 4.0 is realized using sensor networks, automated business processes, robots, smart equipment and machines, actuators, and people. Consequently, a huge volume of disparate data is initialized for analysis and processing. In industry, most of the processes are real-time. To avoid communication delays and ensure data security, the majority of the processes are completed locally and only necessary data is transferred over the Internet for cloud storage. To fulfill this objective, there is always a high requirement of a middleware amidst industrial processes/tools and cloud. In this connection, Fog is the most workable solution for distinct industrial scenarios. In the manufacturing industry, it can facilitate local processing along with tolerable communication delay to robots and actuators. Data gathered from various industrial processes is usually disorganized which needs pre-processing for refinement using Fog locally then communicated to the cloud. So, fog computing plays a vital role in various Industry 4.0 applications by resolving various issues. But the deployment of Fog computing in Industry 4.0 also faces a lot many challenges of different kinds related to programmability, security, heterogeneity, and interoperability. In this book chapter, we present an overview of Fog computing along with the architectural framework of Industry 4.0. We discussed the various applications of Fog computing in industry 4.0 in detail. Different problems faced in the implementation of fog computing in Industry 4.0 will be discussed. We have also introduced various research challenges to be dealt with for the efficient deployment of fog in Industry 4.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aazam M, Zeadally S, Harras KA (2018) Deploying fog computing in industrial internet of things and industry 4.0. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 14:4674–4682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouzarkouna I, Sahnoun M, Sghaier N, Baudry D, Gout C (2018) Challenges facing the industrial implementation of fog computing. In: 2018 IEEE 6th international conference on future internet of things and cloud (FiCloud), pp 341–348

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goyal LM, Mittal M, Sethi JK (2016) Fuzzy model generation using Subtractive and Fuzzy C-Means clustering. CSI Trans ICT 4:129–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0: final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion: Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mittal M, Balas VE, Goyal LM, Kumar R (eds) (2019) Big data processing using spark in cloud. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mittal M, Sharma RK, Singh VP (2014) Validation of k-means and threshold based clustering method. Int J Adv Technol 5(2):153–160

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peralta G, Iglesias-Urkia M, Barcelo M, Gomez R, Moran A, Bilbao J (2017) Fog computing based efficient IoT scheme for the Industry 4.0. In: 2017 IEEE international workshop of electronics, control, measurement, signals and their application to mechatronics (ECMSM), pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saleem MA, Zhou S, Sharif A, Saba T, Zia MA, Javed A et al (2019) Expansion of cluster head stability using fuzzy in cognitive radio CR-VANET. IEEE Access 7:173185–173195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaquero LM, Rodero-Merino L (2014) Finding your way in the fog: towards a comprehensive definition of fog computing. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 44:27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barcelo M, Correa A, Llorca J, Tulino AM, Vicario JL, Morell A (2016) IoT-cloud service optimization in next generation smart environments. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 34:4077–4090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Christian M (2018) Fog computing. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60:351–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mittal M, Battineni G, Goyal LM, Chhetri B, Oberoi SV, Chintalapudi N et al (2020) Cloud-based framework to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on seafarers’ mental health. Int Marit Health 71:213–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harish G, Nagaraju S, Harish B, Shaik M (2019) A review on fog computing and its applications. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng (IJITEE), pp 2278–3075

    Google Scholar 

  14. Basir R, Qaisar S, Ali M, Aldwairi M, Ashraf MI, Mahmood A et al (2019) Fog computing enabling industrial internet of things: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Sensors 19:4807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh R, Gehlot A, Khilrani JK, Mittal M (2020) Internet of things–triggered and power-efficient smart pedometer algorithm for intelligent wearable devices. In: Wearable and implantable medical devices. Elsevier, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lu Y (2017) Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J Ind Inf Integr 6:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ladiges J, Fay A, Holm T, Hempen U, Urbas L, Obst M et al (2017) Integration of modular process units into process control systems. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54:1870–1880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vogel-Heuser B, Diedrich C, Pantförder D, Göhner P (2014) Coupling heterogeneous production systems by a multi-agent based cyber-physical production system. In: 2014 12th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), pp 713–719

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roblek V, Meško M, Krapež A (2016) A complex view of industry 4.0. SAGE Open 6:2158244016653987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wan J, Tang S, Shu Z, Li D, Wang S, Imran M et al (2016) Software-defined industrial internet of things in the context of industry 4.0. IEEE Sens J 16:7373–7380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruber FE (2013) Industry 4.0: a best practice project of the automotive industry. In: IFIP international conference on digital product and process development systems, pp 36–40

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stojmenovic I, Wen S (2014) The fog computing paradigm: scenarios and security issues. In: 2014 Federated conference on computer science and information systems, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arora V, Leekha RS, Lee K, Kataria A (2020) Facilitating user authorization from imbalanced data logs of credit cards using artificial intelligence. Mob Inform Syst 2020

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aazam M, Huh E-N (2014) Fog computing and smart gateway based communication for cloud of things. In: 2014 International conference on future internet of things and cloud, pp 464–470

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bonomi F, Milito R, Zhu J, Addepalli S (2012) Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing, pp 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hong K, Lillethun D, Ramachandran U, Ottenwälder B, Koldehofe B (2013) Mobile fog: a programming model for large-scale applications on the internet of things. In: Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Mobile cloud computing, pp 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kataria A, Ghosh S, Karar V (2018) Data prediction of optical head tracking using self healing neural model for head mounted display

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta H, Vahid Dastjerdi A, Ghosh SK, Buyya R (2017) iFogSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the Internet of Things, Edge and Fog computing environments. Software: Pract Exp 47:1275–1296

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aazam M, Huh E-N (2015) Dynamic resource provisioning through fog micro datacenter. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communication workshops (PerCom workshops), pp 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rani S, Gupta O (2017) CLUS_GPU-BLASTP: accelerated protein sequence alignment using GPU-enabled cluster. J Supercomput 73:4580–4595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu D, Liu S, Zhang L, Terpenny J, Gao RX, Kurfess T et al (2017) A fog computing-based framework for process monitoring and prognosis in cyber-manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 43:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mouradian C, Naboulsi D, Yangui S, Glitho RH, Morrow MJ, Polakos PA (2017) A comprehensive survey on fog computing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutorials 20:416–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mukherjee M, Matam R, Shu L, Maglaras L, Ferrag MA, Choudhury N et al (2017) Security and privacy in fog computing: Challenges. IEEE Access 5:19293–19304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bonomi F, Milito R, Natarajan P, Zhu J (2014) Fog computing: a platform for internet of things and analytics. In: Big data and internet of things: a roadmap for smart environments. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–186

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dastjerdi AV, Gupta H, Calheiros RN, Ghosh SK, Buyya R (2016) Fog computing: principles, architectures, and applications. In: Internet of things. Elsevier, pp 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rani S, Gupta O (2016) Empirical analysis and performance evaluation of various GPU implementations of Protein BLAST. Int J Comput Appl 151

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mukherjee M, Shu L, Wang D (2018) Survey of fog computing: fundamental, network applications, and research challenges. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutorials 20:1826–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Osanaiye O, Chen S, Yan Z, Lu R, Choo K-KR, Dlodlo M (2017) From cloud to fog computing: a review and a conceptual live VM migration framework. IEEE Access 5:8284–8300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Soo S, Chang C, Loke SW, Srirama SN (2018) Proactive mobile fog computing using work stealing: data processing at the edge. In: Fog computing: breakthroughs in research and practice. IGI Global, pp 264–283

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gupta O, Rani S (2013) Accelerating molecular sequence analysis using distributed computing environment. Int J Sci Eng Res–IJSER

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chang C, Srirama SN, Buyya R (2017) Indie fog: An efficient fog-computing infrastructure for the internet of things. Computer 50:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cañas C, Pacheco E, Kemme B, Kienzle J, Jacobsen v (2015) Graphs: a graph publish/subscribe middleware. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual middleware conference, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  43. Monajjemi V, Wawerla J, Vaughan R (2014) Drums: a middleware-aware distributed robot monitoring system. In: 2014 Canadian conference on computer and robot vision, pp 211–218

    Google Scholar 

  44. Depuru SSSR, Wang L, Devabhaktuni V, Gudi N (2011) Smart meters for power grid—challenges, issues, advantages and status. In: 2011 IEEE/PES power systems conference and exposition, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  45. Farhangi H (2009) The path of the smart grid. IEEE Power Energ Mag 8:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shukla R (2016) Smart waste management. Asian J Pharm Educ Res 5:48–54

    Google Scholar 

  47. Glouche Y, Couderc P (2013) A smart waste management with self-describing objects. In: The second international conference on smart systems, devices and technologies (SMART'13)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Aazam M, St-Hilaire M, Lung C-H, Lambadaris I (2016) Cloud-based smart waste management for smart cities. In: 2016 IEEE 21st international workshop on computer aided modelling and design of communication links and networks (CAMAD), pp 188–193

    Google Scholar 

  49. Andreev S, Galinina O, Pyattaev A, Gerasimenko M, Tirronen T, Torsner J et al (2015) Understanding the IoT connectivity landscape: a contemporary M2M radio technology roadmap. IEEE Commun Mag 53:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rani, S., Kataria, A., Chauhan, M. (2022). Fog Computing in Industry 4.0: Applications and Challenges—A Research Roadmap. In: Tiwari, R., Mittal, M., Goyal, L.M. (eds) Energy Conservation Solutions for Fog-Edge Computing Paradigms. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 74. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3448-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3448-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3450-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3448-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics